Doctor's attire influences perceived empathy in the patient-doctor relationship.
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether doctors' attire influences the perception of empathy in the patient-doctor relationship during a therapeutic encounter. METHODS: A total number of 143 patients were divided into four groups when they were consulting a Traditional Korean Medicine doctor. Depending on the group, the same doctor was wearing four different attires - Casual, Suit, Traditional dress, White coat - when having a clinical consultation with the patients. RESULTS: The patients preferred white coat and traditional dress more than other attires, giving highest scores to white coat in competency, trustworthiness and preference of attire and to traditional dress in comfortableness and contentment with the consultation. The "Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE)" score was significantly higher in the "White coat" and "Traditional" groups, compared to the "Casual" and "Suit" groups. CONCLUSION: The strong association between the patients' preference of doctors' attire and the CARE score indicates that the doctor's attire plays not only an important role for establishing confidence and trustworthiness but also for the perception of empathy in the patient-doctor relationship. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The doctor's attire can function as an effective tool of non-verbal communication in order to signal confidence, trust and empathy and establish a good patient-doctor relationship.
- SourceAvailable from: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To ascertain whether the quality of physician-patient communication makes a significant difference to patient health outcomes. The MEDLINE database was searched for articles published from 1983 to 1993 using "physician-patient relations" as the primary medical subject heading. Several bibliographies and conference proceedings were also reviewed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and analytic studies of physician-patient communication in which patient health was an outcome variable. The following information was recorded about each study: sample size, patient characteristics, clinical setting, elements of communication assessed, patient outcomes measured, and direction and significance of any association found between aspects of communication and patient outcomes. Of the 21 studies that met the final criteria for review, 16 reported positive results, 4 reported negative (i.e., nonsignificant) results, and 1 was inconclusive. The quality of communication both in the history-taking segment of the visit and during discussion of the management plan was found to influence patient health outcomes. The outcomes affected were, in descending order of frequency, emotional health, symptom resolution, function, physiologic measures (i.e., blood pressure and blood sugar level) and pain control. Most of the studies reviewed demonstrated a correlation between effective physician-patient communication and improved patient health outcomes. The components of effective communication identified by these studies can be used as the basis both for curriculum development in medical education and for patient education programs. Future research should focus on evaluating such educational programs.Canadian Medical Association Journal 06/1995; 152(9):1423-33. · 6.47 Impact Factor
- [show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Growing interest in the doctor-patient relationship focuses attention on the specific elements of that relationship that affect patients' health outcomes. Data are presented for four clinical trials conducted in varied practice settings among chronically ill patients differing markedly in sociodemographic characteristics. These trials demonstrated that "better health" measured physiologically (blood pressure or blood sugar), behaviorally (functional status), or more subjectively (evaluations of overall health status) was consistently related to specific aspects of physician-patient communication. We conclude that the physician-patient relationship may be an important influence on patients' health outcomes and must be taken into account in light of current changes in the health care delivery system that may place this relationship at risk.Medical Care 04/1989; 27(3 Suppl):S110-27. · 3.23 Impact Factor
- [show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To examine the population distribution of different types of relationships between people with chronic conditions and their doctors that influence decisions being made from a shared-decision making perspective. A survey questionnaire based on recurring themes about the doctor/patient relationship identified from qualitative in-depth interviews with people with chronic conditions and doctors was administered to a national population sample (n=999) of people with chronic conditions. Three factors explained the doctor/patient relationship. Factor 1 identified a positive partnership characteristic of involvement and shared decision-making; Factor 2 doctor-controlled relationship; Factor 3 relationship with negative dimensions. Cluster analysis identified four population groups. Cluster 1 doctor is in control (9.7% of the population); Cluster 2 ambivalent (27.6%); Cluster 3 positive long-term relationship (58.6%); Cluster 4 unhappy relationship (4.4%). The proportion of 18-34 year olds is significantly higher than expected in Cluster 4. The proportion of 65+ year olds is significantly higher than expected in Cluster 1, and significantly lower than expected in Cluster 4. This study adds to shared decision-making literature in that it shows in a representative sample of people with chronic illnesses how their perceptions of their experiences of the doctor-patient relationship are distributed across the population. Consideration needs to be given as to whether it is better to help doctors to alter their styles of interactions to suit the preferences of different patients or if it is feasible to match patients with doctors by style of decision-making and patient preference.Patient Education and Counseling 09/2011; 86(1):127-33. · 2.37 Impact Factor
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
Author's personal copy
Doctor’s attire influences perceived empathy in the patient–doctor relationship
Heesu Chung, Hyeyeon Lee, Dong-Seon Chang, Ho-Sun Kim, Hyejung Lee, Hi-Joon Park,
Acupuncture & Meridian Science Research Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Communication is a crucial component in establishing a
positive patient–doctor relationship and various studies have
indicated its importance by demonstrating a close association
between patient–doctor communication and direct patient health
outcomes [1–4]. However, there are various forms of interactions
during a clinical encounter which can determine the patient–
doctor relationship  and few studies have attempted to analyze
the different components of patient–doctor communication
separately . Although the verbal component is essential to
share important medical information with the patient and enhance
‘patient enablement’ , nonverbal behavior has received surpris-
ingly little attention in the field of health communication [8,9].
Non-verbal behavior encompasses physical appearance, gesture
and body movements, facial expressions, eye movements and
vocal modifications [10,11], whereas during the first clinical
encounter, the physical appearance of the doctor plays an
important role for establishing the subsequent patient–doctor
The doctor’s attire is a vital part of the first impression the
patient will develop of the doctor . During the first clinical
encounter, the patient and the doctor do not only exchange
medical information about the treatment, but also build up trust
and confidence for the future therapeutic relationship [12,14]. The
attire or clothing in general is an influential source of nonverbal
communication , especially in the absence of other informa-
tion about the person such as during the first encounter . For
physicians, the doctor’s attire functions as a symbol of recognition,
professionalism and trust [17,18], whereas in other professions,
the attire or clothing style also functions as a message source of
nonverbal communication on credibility, trustworthiness, or
likeability [19,20]. It has been also reported, that dressing more
formally in workplaces results in more professional behaviors and
changes in self-perceptions of the employees [21,22]. However, the
doctor’s appearance is not the only factor influencing the patient-
doctor relationship. There are a number of non-specific and
psychosocial factors which have been known to play a great role in
patient satisfaction and improvement, and along with the different
expectations of the patients, the doctor’s physical appearance in
the patient-doctor relationship is just one of those factors [23,24].
It has been also known, that patients, who particularly seek
Patient Education and Counseling 89 (2012) 387–391
A R T I C L E
I N F O
Received 2 March 2011
Received in revised form 23 February 2012
Accepted 26 February 2012
A B S T R A C T
Objective: This study investigated whether doctors’ attire influences the perception of empathy in the
patient–doctor relationship during a therapeutic encounter.
Methods: A total number of 143 patients were divided into four groups when they were consulting a
Traditional Korean Medicine doctor. Depending on the group, the same doctor was wearing four different
attires – Casual, Suit, Traditional dress, White coat – when having a clinical consultation with the
Results: The patients preferred white coat and traditional dress more than other attires, giving highest
scores to white coat in competency, trustworthiness and preference of attire and to traditional dress in
comfortableness and contentment with the consultation. The ‘‘Consultation and Relational Empathy
(CARE)’’ score was significantly higher in the ‘‘White coat’’ and ‘‘Traditional’’ groups, compared to the
‘‘Casual’’ and ‘‘Suit’’ groups.
Conclusion: The strong association between the patients’ preference of doctors’ attire and the CARE score
indicates that the doctor’s attire plays not only an important role for establishing confidence and
trustworthiness but also for the perception of empathy in the patient–doctor relationship.
Practice implications: The doctor’s attire can function as an effective tool of non-verbal communication in
order to signal confidence, trust and empathy and establish a good patient–doctor relationship.
? 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author at: Acupuncture & Meridian Science Research Center,
Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Republic of
Korea. Tel.: +82 2 961 2208; fax: +82 2 963 2175.
E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org (Y. Chae).
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Patient Education and Counseling
jo ur n al h o mep ag e: w ww .elsevier .co m /loc ate/p ated u co u
0738-3991/$ – see front matter ? 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author's personal copy
alternative treatments such as acupuncture, seem to value the
relationship with their practitioner very high [25,26].
Empathy is also a fundamental and crucial component in
establishing a good therapeutic relationship between a patient and
a doctor [27,28]. Empathy in a therapeutic relationship can be
defined as following: empathy in the clinical context involves the
ability (1) to understand the patient’s situation, perspective and
feelings (and their attached meanings); (2) to communicate that
understanding and check its accuracy; and (3) to act on that
understanding with the patient in a helpful therapeutic way . A
measure of empathy assessing patients’ perception of the
practitioner’s empathy in the clinical encounter was developed
by Mercer et al. This assessment has been called the ‘consultation
and relational empathy’ (CARE) measure and has been tested and
validated in several contexts . The CARE measure is considered
as being of high relevance to everyday consultations in general
practice by both practitioners and patients .
There have been many studies about the influence of different
doctors’ attire on patients’ perception of competency or trust
[13,17,32–35]. However, the question whether the doctor’s attire is
also associated with the establishment of more empathy in the
patient–doctor relationship has not been answered yet. In
addition, most of the previous studies on the influence of doctors’
attire were carried out showing the patients different photographs
of the doctor, but not tested in real clinics [32–35].
In the present study, we assessed the possible association
between doctors’ attire and empathy in a therapeutic relation-
ship using the CARE measure. We hypothesized that higher
ratings of traits such as competency, trustworthiness and
preference for a certain dress style should be in compliance
with more perception of empathy in the therapeutic relationship
for the same attire, and tested this not in an experimental setup
but in real clinics.
2.1. Participants and groups
A total of 143 patients (male = 48, female = 95) participated in
this study. All patients were recruited at a Traditional Korean
Medical Clinic in Kyunggido, Korea. Only patients were recruited
who visited the clinic for the first time in order to control for
prejudgments of the patients toward the doctor. Additionally, only
patients were recruited who came for the treatment of pain by
acupuncture in order to control for symptoms and treatments.
Basic demographic data such as name, age, and gender were
acquired from all participants by a questionnaire. This investiga-
tion was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the
human subjects committee of Kyung Hee University, Seoul,
Republic of Korea.
The patients were randomly divided into four different
groups and the same doctor met the patients in four different
attires during the first clinical consultation. The first group
male = 17,
female = 21)
wearing Casual, whereas the second group (‘‘Suit’’; male = 8,
female = 24), third group (‘‘Traditional’’; male = 10, female = 25),
fourth group (‘‘White coat’’; male = 13, female = 25) were seeing
the same doctor wearing Suit, Traditional dress and White coat,
The clinical consultation between the doctor and the patient
always followed the same order and process. The consultation took
about 5 min per patient and proceeded as following: (1) Asking
about the main complaint and pain (the location of pain, when did
it start, how does it feel), (2) feeling the pulse for diagnosis, (3)
palpation of the location of pain, (4) stating the doctor’s diagnosis
(5) teaching matters that require attention during the time of the
treatment and after the consultation.
2.3. Patient evaluation after consultation
After the consultation, the patients were asked about their
impression of the doctor’s competency, trustworthiness, comfort-
ableness, preference of attire and their contentment with the
consultation by an independent experimenter. These five ques-
tions were asked in a questionnaire and the patients had to answer
using a 5-point Likert scale, whereas 5 represented ‘‘strongly
agree’’, 4 ‘‘agree’’, 3 ‘‘neither agree nor disagree’’, 2 ‘‘disagree’’ and 1
The independent experimenter also assessed empathy in the
therapeutic relationship using the ‘Consultation and Relational
Empathy’ (CARE) measure. This questionnaire was developed by
Mercer et al. in order to have a general consultation process
measure which assesses empathy in a therapeutic relationship
. This questionnaire consisted of 10 questions with possible
answers on a 1–5 scale. For the measure, the answers to all
questions were added together, whereas the total achievable score
2.4. Data analysis
The answers about the patients’ impression of the doctor
and the CARE measurement scores after the consultation
were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
and Tukey’s post hoc analysis. For statistical analysis, SPSS 13.0
was used and the statistical significance level was set for
p < 0.05.
3.1. Demographic characteristics
The sample population comprised of hundred and forty three
(143) outpatients, with the mean age of 37.7 years. The ‘‘Casual’’
group consisted of 38 patients, 17 male (45%) and 21 female (55%),
with the mean age of 36.8 years. The ‘‘Suit’’ group consisted of 32
patients, 8 male (25%), 24 female (75%), the ‘‘Traditional’’ group
consisted of 35 patients, 10 male (29%), 25 female (71%), and the
‘‘White coat’’ group consisted of 38 patients, 13 male (35%), 25
female (65%), with mean ages of 38.8, 38.1 and 37.1 years,
3.2. Group differences
There was a clear difference between the ‘‘Traditional’’ and
‘‘White coat’’ group, compared to the ‘‘Suit’’ and ‘‘Casual’’ group,
when patients’ impressions of the doctor after the clinical
consultation were evaluated by five different questions regarding
the doctor’s competency, trustworthiness, comfortableness,
preference of attire and the contentment with the consultation
(Table 1). To question 1 ‘‘the doctor seemed competent’’, question
2, ‘‘the doctor seemed trustworthy’’, and question 4, ‘‘I prefer this
doctor’s attire’’, the doctor got highest ratings from the patients in
the ‘‘White coat’’ group, followed in the order of ‘‘Traditional’’,
‘‘Suit’’, and ‘‘Casual’’ groups. The doctor got higher ratings from the
‘‘Traditional’’ group to question 3, ‘‘the doctor made me feel
comfortable’’, and question 5, ‘‘I am content with the consulta-
tion’’, followed in the order of ‘‘White coat’’, ‘‘Suit’’, and ‘‘Casual’’
H. Chung et al. / Patient Education and Counseling 89 (2012) 387–391
Author's personal copy
3.3. Assessed empathy in the patient–doctor relationship
The patient–doctor relationship was evaluated using the
‘‘Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE)’’ measurement
questionnaire [7–9]. When all patients’ answers were evaluated
and averaged, there was a significant difference between the
‘‘White coat (38.29 ? 0.98)’’ and ‘‘Traditional (37.72 ? 1.32)’’ groups
and the ‘‘Casual (33.65 ? 1.24)’’ and ‘‘Suit (33.85 ? 0.80)’’ groups
[F[3,139]= 5.451, p < 0.001]. The CARE score was significantly higher in
the ‘‘White coat’’ and ‘‘Traditional’’ groups, compared to the ‘‘Casual’’
and ‘‘Suit’’ groups. The ratings to all ten questions were averaged and
a total CARE measure score was determined for each group as shown
in Fig. 1.
4. Discussion and conclusion
What is the relationship between the first impression of a
doctor, and perceived empathy in the therapeutic consultation
with the doctor? For sure, it is to be expected that a good first
impression should lead to more empathy felt in the therapeutic
relationship. However, the answer to this question depends very
much on what determines the first impression of a doctor. First
impressions, including inferences of specific personality traits such
as attractiveness, competency, trustworthiness, or likeability are
known to be formed fast, intuitive and unreflective, even within a
few hundred milliseconds . These first impressions in general,
not only in specific social situations, are predominantly formed by
the intuitive recognition of facial features [36–39], but it has been
also reported that clothing cues play a significant role in predicting
people’s general impression of a person . In the present study,
we tried to control the first impression of a medical doctor during
the first clinical encounter with the single independent variable of
the doctor’s attire. The same doctor met four different groups of
patients and went into the first clinical consultation session
dressed in four different attires – White coat, Traditional, Suit and
Casual, respectively. Since the doctor was the same, and followed
the exact same protocol in each session, there could be no
significant difference in facial features or verbal communication
When the patients were asked to rate their first impression with
the doctor, they gave highest scores in ‘competency’, ‘trustworthi-
ness’ and ‘preference’ when the doctor was dressed with the white
coat, and highest scores in ‘comfortableness’ and ‘contentment
with the consultation’ when the doctor was dressed ‘Traditional’.
These results are in concordance with our previous study ,
where we asked the patients the same questions with the only
difference that the patients did not actually meet the doctor but
rated pictures of a doctor in four different attires (White coat,
Traditional, Suit and Casual) on a computer screen, in a controlled
experimental setting. The impact of clothing cues on the formation
of first impression and trait inferences of the doctor seem to be
consistent, regardless of whether this cue was presented in a real
clinical session or in a virtual, experimental setup.
Our results are also consistent with other studies, reporting
higher scores in trustworthiness and confidence ratings for doctors
wearing the white coat [17,32,33,41–43]. However, considering
the recent discussions about the dangers of hospital infections due
to the white coat, especially in the UK, and the negative
connotation of the ‘white-coat effect’, the results could be different
depending on where this kind of study was conducted [44–47]. The
social perception of the doctor in patients differs from society to
society . In Korea, even though oriental medical doctors have
been practicing healing in traditional dresses for more than
2000 years, the white coat nowadays symbolizes predominantly
‘scientific’ and ‘professional’ medical settings, which is why the
white coat is associated with positive images in patients . Still,
it has been also shown that patients feel more comfortable and
content when the doctor treated them in the traditional dress. This
could be due to the fact that this study was conducted in a
Traditional Korean clinic.
In our present study when comparing different groups of
patients, the patients’ evaluation of the doctor’s traits depending
on the doctor’s attire was notably overlapping with the total CARE
measure score. The CARE measure score was the highest for the
white coat and traditional dress. This suggests an influence of
doctor’s attire on the establishment of empathy in the therapeutic
situation. Previous studies have revealed that the practitioner’s
empathy was indeed related with the answers of patients and that
the CARE measure is a valid tool to assess this . The validity of
the CARE measure was also proved in different cultures, including
England and China [31,49].
Fig. 1. The patient–doctor relationship was evaluated using the Consultation and
Relational Empathy (CARE) measurement questionnaire. The CARE score was
significantly higher in the ‘‘White coat’’ and ‘‘Traditional’’ groups, compared to the
‘‘Casual’’ and ‘‘Suit’’ groups. Data are represented as mean ? S.E.
Patients’ evaluation of doctor’s attire after the clinical consultation.
Casual (n = 38)
Suit (n = 32)
Traditional (n = 35)
White coat (n = 38)
‘‘The doctor seemed competent’’
‘‘The doctor seemed trustworthy’’
‘‘The doctor made me feel comfortable’’
‘‘I prefer this doctor’s attire’’
‘‘I am content with the consultation’’
3.42 ? 0.12
3.63 ? 0.15
3.55 ? 0.14
3.61 ? 0.10
3.66 ? 0.12
3.59 ? 0.12
3.69 ? 0.31
3.66 ? 0.14
3.53 ? 0.12
3.75 ? 0.14
3.94 ? 0.15**
3.97 ? 0.11
4.09 ? 0.14**
3.94 ? 0.16
4.11 ? 0.13**
3.97 ? 0.10**
4.13 ? 0.09**
4.05 ? 0.12**
4.08 ? 0.11**
4.11 ? 0.10**
**p < 0.01 compared with Casual.
H. Chung et al. / Patient Education and Counseling 89 (2012) 387–391
Author's personal copy
How does the preference for the white coat and traditional
dress relate to more perceived empathy in the clinical consulta-
tion? Probably the answer lies in the patients’ expectation. The
patient–doctor relationship is often determined by whether the
doctor’s actual image including his/her verbal and nonverbal
behavior is concordant with the patient’s own expectation of the
doctor’s image [6,50]. Health care outcomes often include the
component of patient satisfaction and since the patients’ ratings of
these values are mainly subjective, positive results are often
related to the factor of how much the doctor’s image goes together
with what the patient expects . In turn, the doctor’s verbal and
nonverbal communication behavior must also often go together
with what the doctor thinks that the patient expects [52,53]. This
way, the perceived empathy in the clinical consultation as a main
factor of establishing a positive patient–doctor relationship is
probably also closely associated with the patient’s expected image
of the doctor.
There are a number of limitations of this current study which
should be mentioned. First, in this study, only one doctor and one
clinic was used in this setting, therefore the meaning of the results
of this study could be limited by the socio-cultural surroundings
where this study has been carried out. Second, the gender of the
doctor (female) could have an influence on the ratings of the
patients. If possible, in future studies the gender of the doctor and
the patients should be balanced and controlled. Third, there is the
possibility that the self-perception and preference of the doctor for
the attires have played a role and influenced impressions of the
patients. Still, this possibility can be ruled out by looking at the
results of the previous study where this was controlled .
In summary, we hypothesized that higher ratings of traits such
as competency, trustworthiness and preference for a certain dress
style should be in compliance with more perception of empathy in
the therapeutic relationship for the same attire, since higher
ratings of the patients should reflect whether doctor’s attire was
concordant with the patients’ expectation of the doctor’s appear-
ance. The higher scores in ‘competency’, ‘trustworthiness’ and
‘preference’ when the doctor was dressed in the ‘white coat’, and
‘comfortableness’ and ‘contentment’ when the doctor was dressed
‘traditional’, went together with the higher total CARE scores for
the doctor dressed in ‘white coat’ and ‘traditional’. The similar
ratings of the patients’ preference of doctors’ attire and the
perceived empathy in the patient–doctor relationship indicates
that how the doctor is dressed has an effect in establishing a good
patient–doctor relationship and confirms our hypothesis.
4.3. Practice implications
Making a good first impression in clinical encounters is not only
important for building up trust and confidence, but also for
enhancing perceived empathy which is in turn important for the
therapeutic relationship. It could be advisable to dress according to
the patients’ expectation of the doctor’s image, which would be
preferably wearing a white coat or a traditional dress for a clinical
consultation in Korea. In general, educating practitioners about
how their attire or clothing functions as an influential source of
nonverbal communication would be also an important matter for
enhancing the patient–doctor relationship.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicting of competing interests
regarding this article.
Author disclosure statement
The authors declare that no competing financial interests or
conflicts of interest exist. The funders had no role in the study
design, data collection and analysis and the decision to publish the
Role of the funding source
None of the authors have any role of the funding source
regarding this article.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded
by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2005-
0049404). The first author, named by Heesu Chung, was supported
by the Undergraduate Research Program (URP) grant funded by
Kyung Hee University College of Oriental Medicine. We also thank
Hunter Desmaray for his help in editing and proofreading the
 Street Jr RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal?
Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Pa-
tient Educ Couns 2009;74:295–301.
 Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’
communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:791–806.
 Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health out-
comes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 1995;152:1423–33.
 Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware Jr JE. Assessing the effects of physician–patient
interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989;27:S110–27.
 Adams R, Price K, Tucker G, Nguyen AM, Wilson D. The doctor and the patient—
How is a clinical encounter perceived? Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:127–33.
 Pawlikowska T, Zhang W, Griffiths F, van Dalen J, van der Vleuten C. Verbal and
non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations—
How this relates to patient enablement. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:70–6.
 Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary
care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2002;48:51–61.
 Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinician–patient
interaction. Appl Prev Psychol 1995;4:21–37.
 Roter DL, Frankel RM, Hall JA, Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through
nonverbal behavior in medical visits. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:S28–34.
 Knapp ML, Hall JA. Nonverbal communication in human interaction, 6th ed.,
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2005.
 Richmond VP, McCroskey JC, Hickson ML. Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal
relations, 6th ed., Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
 Short D. First impression. Br J Hosp Med 1993;50:270–1.
 Rehman SU, Nietert PJ, Cope DW, Kilpatrick AO. What to wear today? Effect of
doctor’s attire on the trust and confidence of patients. Am J Med 2005;118:
 Van Dulmen AM, Verhaak PFM, Bilo HJG. Shifts in doctor–patient communi-
cation during a series of outpatient consultations in non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus. Patient Educ Couns 1997;30:227–37.
 Holman RH. Clothing as communication: an empirical investigation. Adv
Consum Res 1980;7:372–7.
 Harris MB, James J, Chavez J, Fuller ML, Kent S, Massanari C, et al. Clothing:
communication, compliance and choice. J Appl Soc Psychol 1983;13:88–97.
 Gherardi G, Cameron J, West A, Crossley M. Are we dressed to impress? A
descriptive survey assessing patients’ preference of doctors’ attire in the
hospital setting. Clin Med 2009;9:519–24.
 Chang DS, Lee H, Lee HJ, Park HJ, Chae Y. What to wear when practicing oriental
medicine: patients’ preferences for doctor’s attire. J Altern Complement Med
 O’Neal GS, Lapitsky M. Effects of clothing as nonverbal communication on
credibility of the message source. Cloth Text Res J 1991;9:28–34.
 Johnson BH, Nagasawa RH, Peters K. Clothing style differences: their effect on
the impression of sociability. J Home Econ Res 1977;6:58–63.
 Sundaram DS, Webster C. The role of nonverbal communication in service
encounters. J Serv Market 2000;14:378–91.
 Peluchette J, Karl K. Dressing to impress: beliefs and attitudes regarding
workplace attire. J Bus Psych 2006;21:45–63.
 Dorr GS, Lipkin M. The doctor–patient relationship. Challenges, opportunities
and strategies. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:S26–33.
 Kaptchuk TJ, Kelley JM, Conboy LA, Davis RB, Kerr CE, Jacobson EE, et al.
Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with
irritable bowel syndrome. Br Med J 2008;336:999–1003.
H. Chung et al. / Patient Education and Counseling 89 (2012) 387–391
Author's personal copy
 Gould A, MacPherson H. Patient perspectives on outcomes after treatment
with acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med 2001;7:261–8.
 Price S, Mercer SW, MacPherson H. Practitioner empathy, patient enablement
and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient
Educ Couns 2006;63:239–45.
 Reynolds WJ, Scott B. Empathy: a crucial component of the helping relation-
ship. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 1999;6:363–70.
 MacPherson H, Mercer SW, Scullion T, Thomas KJ. Empathy, enablement and
outcome: an exploratory study on acupuncture patients’ perceptions. J Altern
Complement Med 2003;9:869–76.
 Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GCM. The consultation and relational
empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reli-
ability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract 2004;
 Mercer SW. An empathy-based consultation quality measure for use in CAM
and conventional care settings. Focus Altern Complement Ther 2003;8:153.
 Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GCM. Relevance and
practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure in
general practice. Fam Pract 2005;22:328–34.
 Budny AM, Rogers LC, Mandracchia VJ, Lascher S. The physician’s attire and its
influence on patient confidence. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2006;96:132–8.
 Menahem S, Shvartzman P. Is our appearance important to our patients? Fam
 Lill MM, Wilkinson TJ. Judging a book by its cover: descriptive survey of
patients’ preferences for doctors’ appearance and mode of address. Br Med J
 Barrett TG, Booth IW. Sartorial eloquence: does it exist in the paediatrician–
patient relationship? Br Med J 1994;309:1710–2.
 Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms
exposure to a face. Psychol Sci 2006;17:592–8.
 Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC. Inferences of competence from
faces predict election outcomes. Science 2005;308:1623–6.
 Todorov A, Duchaine B. Reading trustworthiness in faces without recognizing
faces. Cogn Neuropsychol 2008;25:395–410.
 Hassin R, Trope Y. Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiog-
nomy. J Pers Soc Psych 2000;78:837–52.
 Lennon SJ. Additivity of clothing cues in first impressions. Soc Behav Pers
 Harnett PR. Should doctors wear white coats? Med J Aust 2001;174:
 Farraj R, Baron JH. Why do hospital doctors wear white coats? J R Soc Med
 Ikusaka M, Kamegai M, Sunaga T, Narita N, Kobayashi H, Yonenami K, et al.
Patients attitude toward consultations by a physician without a white coat in
Japan. Intern Med 1999;38:533–6.
 Palazzo S, Hocken DB. Patients’ perspective on how doctors dress. J Hosp Infec
 Dancer SJ. Pants, policies and paranoia. J Hosp Infec 2010;74:10–5.
 Subramanian P, Willis-Owen CA, Houlihan-Burne D. Bare below the
elbows: What do patients think? Ann R Coll Surg Engl (Suppl) 2010;92:
 Lantelme P, Milon H, Gharib C, Gayet C, Fortrat JO. White coat effect and
reactivity to stress. Hypertension 1998;31:1021–9.
 Blumhagen DW. The doctor’s white coat: the image of the physician in modern
America. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:111–6.
 Fung CS, Hua A, Tam L, Mercer SW. Reliability and validity of the Chinese
version of the CARE measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong. Fam Pract
 Thiedke CC. What do we really know about patient satisfaction? Fam Pract
 Kalliainen LK, Lichtman DM. Current issues in the physician–patient relation-
ship. J Hand Surg 2010;351:2126–9.
 Staniszewska S, Ahmed L. The concepts of expectation and satisfaction: do
they capture the way patients evaluate their care? J Adv Nurs 1999;29:
 Cockburn J. Prescribing behavior in clinical practice: patients’ expectations
and doctors’ perceptions of patients’ expectations – a questionnaire study. Br
Med J 1997;315:520.
H. Chung et al. / Patient Education and Counseling 89 (2012) 387–391