Article

Living Alone and Antidepressant Medication Use: A Prospective Study in a Working-Age Population

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, 00250 Helsinki, Finland.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.32). 03/2012; 12:236. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-236
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An increasing proportion of the population lives in one-person households. The authors examined whether living alone predicts the use of antidepressant medication and whether socioeconomic, psychosocial, or behavioral factors explain this association.
The participants were a nationally representative sample of working-age Finns from the Health 2000 Study, totaling 1695 men and 1776 women with a mean age of 44.6 years. In the baseline survey in 2000, living arrangements (living alone vs. not) and potential explanatory factors, including psychosocial factors (social support, work climate, hostility), sociodemographic factors (occupational grade, education, income, unemployment, urbanicity, rental living, housing conditions), and health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, obesity), were measured. Antidepressant medication use was followed up from 2000 to 2008 through linkage to national prescription registers.
Participants living alone had a 1.81-fold (CI = 1.46-2.23) higher purchase rate of antidepressants during the follow-up period than those who did not live alone. Adjustment for sociodemographic factors attenuated this association by 21% (adjusted OR = 1.64, CI = 1.32-2.05). The corresponding attenuation was 12% after adjustment for psychosocial factors (adjusted OR = 1.71, CI = 1.38-2.11) and 9% after adjustment for health behaviors (adjusted OR = 1.74, CI = 1.41-2.14). Gender-stratified analyses showed that in women the greatest attenuation was related to sociodemographic factors and in men to psychosocial factors.
These data suggest that people living alone may be at increased risk of developing mental health problems. The public health value is in recognizing that people who live alone are more likely to have material and psychosocial problems that may contribute to excess mental health problems in this population group.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Erkki Isometsä, Aug 18, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
155 Views
  • Source
    • "Due to low behavioral activation (e.g., low motivation or energy), undergraduates with elevated depressive symptoms spend less time at social events–where undergraduates normatively drink–and instead spend more time alone and in intimate settings (e.g., with family or romantic partners; Baddelely, Pennebaker, & Beevers, 2012). When alone and when around loved ones, those high in depressive symptoms experience particularly elevated negative affect (Pulkki-Raback et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: According to theory, depressed individuals self-medicate their negative affect with alcohol. Due to isolation and interpersonal difficulties, undergraduates with elevated depressive symptoms may do much of their drinking alone and/or in intimate contexts (e.g., with family or romantic partners) rather than at normative social events (e.g., parties). Evidence suggests drinking in these contexts leads to heavy use and alcohol-related problems. Accordingly, context may be an explanatory mechanism linking depressive symptoms to problematic drinking. This pathway remains understudied in the literature. Our study aimed to examine solitary and intimate drinking as distinct mediators of the depression-problematic drinking association. We hypothesized that depressive symptoms would be positively associated with solitary and intimate drinking which in turn would be associated with elevated alcohol use and related problems. Undergraduates (N=295; 72% women) completed online self-reports. Consistent with hypotheses, path analyses supported depressive symptoms as a positive predictor of solitary drinking, which in turn was a positive predictor of alcohol-related problems, but not of alcohol use. Counter to hypotheses, depressive symptoms were unrelated to intimate drinking. Interestingly, depressive symptoms were negatively associated with drinking at parties, which in turn led to reduced risk for elevated alcohol use and related problems. Our results shed new light on the depression pathway to problematic drinking in undergraduates by considering the role of drinking context. Our findings suggest undergraduates with elevated depressive symptoms are at risk for potentially problematic drinking because they are drinking alone. Solitary drinking represents a malleable target for clinical interventions aimed at reducing risky depression-related alcohol use. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Addictive Behaviors 11/2014; 42C:216-221. DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.031 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), applied among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), using Rasch analysis. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted and the data of 102 people with SCI were analyzed. Rasch analyses were performed to assess dimensionality, overall and individual item fit, response scale structure, targeting, and differential item functioning. Results: The anxiety and depression subscales showed unidimensionality, that is, model and item fit. The two subscales are reliable (r = .72, 0.82) in SCI. No disordered structure of the response scales or differential item functioning in age, gender, education, relationship status, level of spinal lesion were found. Stepwise deletion of the misfitting items did not produce a total score that fulfilled the statistical criteria for unidimensionality. Conclusions: The results of the Rasch analyses support the use of the anxiety and depression subscales among people with SCI. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and examine sensitivity to change of the HADS in SCI, which would support its use in longitudinal observational and intervention studies. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
    Rehabilitation Psychology 08/2012; 57(3):214-23. DOI:10.1037/a0029287 · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Although many studies have addressed the topic of stability versus change in depressive symptoms, few have further decomposed the change to continuous accumulation versus non-systematic state fluctuations or measurement errors. This further step requires a longitudinal follow-up and an appropriate stochastic model; it would, for example, evaluate the hypothesis that women accumulate more susceptibility events than men. Method A linear stochastic differential equation model was estimated for a 16-year longitudinal course of depressive symptoms in the Young Finns community sample of 3596 participants (1832 women, 1764 men). This model enabled us to decompose the variance in depression symptoms into a stable trait, cumulative effects and state/error fluctuations. RESULTS: Women showed higher mean levels and higher variance of depressive symptoms than men. In men, the stable trait accounted for the majority [61%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 48.9-69.2] of the total variance, followed by cumulative effects (23%, 90% CI 9.9-41.7) and state/error fluctuations (16%, 90% CI 5.6-23.2). In women, the cumulative sources were more important than among men and accounted for 44% (90% CI 23.6-58.9) of the variance, followed by stable individual differences (32%, 90% CI 18.5-54.2) and state fluctuations (24%, 90% CI 19.1-27.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with previous observations that women suffer more depression than men, and have more variance in depressive symptoms. We also found that continuously accumulating effects are a significant contributor to between-individual differences in depression, especially for women. Although the accumulating effects are often confounded with non-systematic state fluctuations, the latter are unlikely to exceed 27% of the total variance of depressive symptoms.
    Psychological Medicine 08/2012; DOI:10.1017/S0033291712002000 · 5.43 Impact Factor
Show more