Article

Epilepsy surgery trends in the United States, 1990-2008

UCSF Epilepsy Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 03/2012; 78(16):1200-6. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318250d7ea
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine national time trends of resective surgery for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy before and after Class I evidence demonstrating its efficacy and subsequent practice guidelines recommending early surgical evaluation.
We performed a population-based cohort study with time trends of patients admitted to US hospitals for medically refractory focal epilepsy between 1990 and 2008 who did or did not undergo lobectomy, as reported in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Weighted data revealed 112,026 hospitalizations for medically refractory focal epilepsy and 6,653 resective surgeries (lobectomies and partial lobectomies) from 1990 to 2008. A trend of increasing hospitalizations over time was not accompanied by an increase in surgeries, producing an overall trend of decreasing surgery rates (F = 13.6, p < 0.01). Factors associated with this trend included a decrease in epilepsy hospitalizations at the highest-volume epilepsy centers, and increased hospitalizations to lower-volume hospitals that were found to be less likely to perform surgery. White patients were more likely to have surgery than racial minorities (relative risk [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.17), and privately insured individuals were more likely to receive lobectomy than those with Medicaid or Medicare (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25-1.30).
Despite Class I evidence and subsequent practice guidelines, the utilization of lobectomy has not increased from 1990 to 2008. Surgery continues to be heavily underutilized as a treatment for epilepsy, with significant disparities by race and insurance coverage. Patients who are medically refractory after failing 2 antiepileptic medications should be referred to a comprehensive epilepsy center for surgical evaluation.

Full-text

Available from: Dario J. Englot, Sep 24, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
129 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgery can be a highly effective treatment for medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The emergence of minimally invasive resective and nonresective treatment options has led to interest in epilepsy surgery among patients and providers. Nevertheless, not all procedures are appropriate for all patients, and it is critical to consider seizure outcomes with each of these approaches, as seizure freedom is the greatest predictor of patient quality of life. Standard anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) remains the gold standard in the treatment of TLE, with seizure freedom resulting in 60-80% of patients. It is currently the only resective epilepsy surgery supported by randomized controlled trials and offers the best protection against lateral temporal seizure onset. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy techniques preserve the lateral cortex and temporal stem to varying degrees and can result in favorable rates of seizure freedom but the risk of recurrent seizures appears slightly greater than with ATL, and it is not clear whether neuropsychological outcomes are improved with selective approaches. Stereotactic radiosurgery presents an opportunity to avoid surgery altogether, with seizure outcomes now under investigation. Stereotactic laser thermo-ablation allows destruction of the mesial temporal structures with low complication rates and minimal recovery time, and outcomes are also under study. Finally, while neuromodulatory devices such as responsive neurostimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation have a role in the treatment of certain patients, these remain palliative procedures for those who are not candidates for resection or ablation, as complete seizure freedom rates are low. Further development and investigation of both established and novel strategies for the surgical treatment of TLE will be critical moving forward, given the significant burden of this disease. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 05/2015; 47:24-33. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.033 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clear evidence supports the benefits of surgery over medical therapy for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Surgical procedures meet the needs of fewer than 2% of those eligible. Referral to a tertiary epilepsy center early in the course of disease is recommended; however, patients live with disabling and life-threatening seizures for an average of 22years before considering surgical treatment. Reasons for this treatment gap are unclear. A critical analysis of the literature addressing perceptions of surgical treatment for epilepsy is placed in the context of a brief history and current treatment guidelines. Common conceptual themes shaping perceptions of epilepsy surgery are identified. Data sources used for this study were PubMed-MEDLINE and PsycINFO from 2003 to December 2013; hand searches of reference lists. Nine papers that addressed patient perceptions of surgery for epilepsy and three papers addressing physician attitudes were reviewed. Treatment misperceptions held by both patients and physicians lead to undertreatment and serious health consequences. Fear of surgery, ignorance of treatment options, and tolerance of symptoms emerge as a triad of responses central to weighing treatment risks and benefits and, ultimately, to influencing treatment decision-making. Our novel explanatory framework serves to illustrate and explain relationships among contributory factors. Comparisons across studies are limited by the heterogeneity of study populations and by the fact that no instrument has been developed to consistently measure disability in refractory focal epilepsy. Exploring the components of decision-making for the management of refractory focal epilepsy from the patient's perspective presents a new angle on a serious contemporary challenge in epilepsy care and may lead to explanation as to why there is reluctance to embrace a safe and effective treatment. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 02/2015; 44C:171-178. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.027 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy, and posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) results in significant somatic and psychosocial morbidity. The risk of developing PTE relates directly to TBI severity, but the latency to first seizure can be decades after the inciting trauma. Given this "silent period," much work has focused on identification of molecular and radiographic biomarkers for risk stratification and on development of therapies to prevent epileptogenesis. Clinical management requires vigilant neurologic surveillance and recognition of the heterogeneous endophenotypes associated with PTE. Appropriate treatment of patients who have or are at risk for seizures varies as a function of time after TBI, and the clinician's armamentarium includes an ever-expanding diversity of pharmacological and surgical options. Most recently, neuromodulation with implantable devices has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for some patients with refractory PTE. Here, we review the epidemiology, diagnostic considerations, and treatment options for PTE and develop a roadmap for providers encountering this challenging clinical entity. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
    Seminars in Neurology 02/2015; 35(1):57-63. DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1544239 · 1.78 Impact Factor