Epilepsy surgery trends in the United States, 1990-2008

UCSF Epilepsy Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.29). 03/2012; 78(16):1200-6. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318250d7ea
Source: PubMed


To examine national time trends of resective surgery for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy before and after Class I evidence demonstrating its efficacy and subsequent practice guidelines recommending early surgical evaluation.
We performed a population-based cohort study with time trends of patients admitted to US hospitals for medically refractory focal epilepsy between 1990 and 2008 who did or did not undergo lobectomy, as reported in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Weighted data revealed 112,026 hospitalizations for medically refractory focal epilepsy and 6,653 resective surgeries (lobectomies and partial lobectomies) from 1990 to 2008. A trend of increasing hospitalizations over time was not accompanied by an increase in surgeries, producing an overall trend of decreasing surgery rates (F = 13.6, p < 0.01). Factors associated with this trend included a decrease in epilepsy hospitalizations at the highest-volume epilepsy centers, and increased hospitalizations to lower-volume hospitals that were found to be less likely to perform surgery. White patients were more likely to have surgery than racial minorities (relative risk [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.17), and privately insured individuals were more likely to receive lobectomy than those with Medicaid or Medicare (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25-1.30).
Despite Class I evidence and subsequent practice guidelines, the utilization of lobectomy has not increased from 1990 to 2008. Surgery continues to be heavily underutilized as a treatment for epilepsy, with significant disparities by race and insurance coverage. Patients who are medically refractory after failing 2 antiepileptic medications should be referred to a comprehensive epilepsy center for surgical evaluation.

Download full-text


Available from: Dario J. Englot, Sep 24, 2014
1 Follower
30 Reads
    • "Additional factors might include physician attitude and patient preference. Hospital characteristics revealed most ECoG cases occurring at urban teaching hospitals, which might have been anticipated, and is compatible with other trends in epilepsy surgery [8]. Similarly, hospital size also predicted ECoG, with larger hospitals more likely to provide the procedure. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Invasive electrocorticography (ECoG) is used in patients when it is difficult to localize epileptogenic foci for potential surgical resection. As MR neuroimaging has improved over the past decade, we hypothesized the utilization of ECoG diminishing over time. Using the USA Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we collected demographic and complication data on patients receiving ECoG over the years 1988-2008 and compared this to patients with medically refractory epilepsy during the same time period. A total of 695 cases using extraoperative ECoG were identified, corresponding to 3528 cases nationwide and accounting for 1.1% of patients with refractory epilepsy from 1988-2008. African Americans were less likely to receive ECoG than whites, as were patients with government insurance in comparison to those with private insurance. Large, urban, and academic hospitals were significantly more likely to perform ECoG than smaller, rural, and private practice institutions. The most frequent complication was cerebrospinal fluid leak (11.7%) and only one death was reported from the entire cohort, corresponding to an estimated six patients nationally. Invasive ECoG is a relatively safe procedure offered to a growing number of patients with refractory epilepsy each year. However, these data suggest the presence of demographic disparities in those patients receiving ECoG, possibly reflecting barriers due to race and socioeconomic status. Among patients with nonlocalized seizures, ECoG often represents their only hope for surgical treatment. We therefore must further examine the indications and efficacy of ECoG, and more work must be done to understand if and why ECoG is preferentially performed in select socioeconomic groups. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 02/2015; 22(5). DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.12.002 · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neurology is considered a cognitive field, with thoughtful practitioners who are driven by empiric data. With the development of guidelines, practice parameters, and now a review of how physicians practice, this notion could be called into question.
    Neurology 03/2012; 78(16):1194-5. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318250d86b · 8.29 Impact Factor
  • Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 05/2012; 12(4):348-9. DOI:10.1007/s11910-012-0287-2 · 3.06 Impact Factor
Show more