Quantifying the centre of rotation pattern in a multi-body model of the lumbar spine.

a EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Laboratory for Mechanical Systems Engineering , 129 Ueberlandstrasse , CH-8600 , Dübendorf , Switzerland.
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering (Impact Factor: 1.79). 03/2012; DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.671306
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Understanding the kinematics of the spine provides paramount knowledge for many aspects of the clinical analysis of back pain. More specifically, visualisation of the instantaneous centre of rotation (ICR) enables clinicians to quantify joint laxity in the segments, avoiding a dependence on more inconclusive measurements based on the range of motion and excessive translations, which vary in every individual. Alternatively, it provides motion preserving designers with an insight into where a physiological ICR of a motion preserving prosthesis can be situated in order to restore proper load distribution across the passive and active elements of the lumbar region. Prior to the use of an unconstrained dynamic musculoskeletal model system, based on multi-body models capable of transient analysis, to estimate segmental loads, the model must be kinematically evaluated for all possible sensitivity due to ligament properties and the initial locus of intervertebral disc (IVD). A previously calibrated osseoligamentous model of lumbar spine was used to evaluate the changes in ICR under variation of the ligament stiffness and initial locus of IVD, when subjected to pure moments from 0 to 15 Nm. The ICR was quantified based on the closed solution of unit quaternion that improves accuracy and prevents coordinate singularities, which is often observed in Euler-based methods and least squares principles. The calculation of the ICR during flexion/extension revealed complexity and intrinsic nonlinearity between flexion and extension. This study revealed that, to accommodate a good agreement between in vitro data and the multi-body model predictions, in flexion more laxity is required than in extension. The results showed that the ICR location is concentrated in the posterior region of the disc, in agreement with previous experimental studies. However, the current multi-body model demonstrates a sensitivity to the initial definition of the ICR, which should be recognised as a limitation of the method. Nevertheless, the current simulations suggest that, due to the constantly evolving path of the ICR across the IVD during flexion-extension, a movable ICR is a necessary condition in multi-body modelling of the spine, in the context of whole body simulation, to accurately capture segmental kinematics and kinetics.

Download full-text


Available from: Alireza Abouhossein, Jun 18, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The finite center of rotation (FCR) is often used to assess joint function. It was the purpose of this study to compare the accuracy of the procedure of Crisco et al. [4] for estimating the FCR with a procedure which uses least-squares principles. The procedures were evaluated using noisy data rotated about a known FCR. Both procedures demonstrated increasing accuracy of FCR estimation with increasing rotation angle. As the centroid of a pair of markers was moved further from the FCR, accuracy of its location decreased. Noise levels had a strong influence on FCR estimation accuracy, with the least-squares procedure being better able to cope with noise. Increasing the number of landmarks increased FCR estimation accuracy. The accuracy of the procedure of Crisco et al. [4] increased when multiple estimates of the FCR were averaged. On all of the evaluations performed, the least-squares procedure gave small improvements in the accuracy of estimating the FCR, but was not able to circumvent the inaccuracies which arise when landmarks are not appropriately positioned, numerous, or if the rotation angle is small.
    Medical Engineering & Physics 05/2001; 23(3):227-33. DOI:10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00043-1 · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Data on the stiffnesses of spinal ligaments are required for analytical studies on the mechanical behavior of spinal segments. Values obtained experimentally vary widely in the literature. A finite element model of an L3/L4 functional spinal unit was used to determine the influence of ligament stiffness on intersegmental rotation and forces in the ligaments. The lowest values for ligament stiffness selected from the literature were used in one set of calculations, and the highest values were simulated in a second set. The nonlinear model was loaded with pure moments of 7.5 and 15 Nm in the three main anatomical planes. The mechanical behavior of the functional spinal unit was strongly influenced by ligament stiffness. In some cases, a ligament with low stiffness does not carry any load, while the same ligament with high stiffness has to carry a high load. This indicates that finite element models of spinal segments have to be validated and that a realistic quantitative prediction of ligament forces is extremely difficult.
    Journal of Biomechanics 08/2004; 37(7):1107-11. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.019 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total disc replacement is a novel approach for dynamically stabilizing a painful intervertebral segment. While this approach is gaining popularity, and several types of implants are used, the effect of disc arthroplasty on lumbar biomechanics has not been widely reported. Consequently, beneficial or adverse effects of this procedure may not be fully realized, and data for kinematic optimization are unavailable. To characterize kinematic and load transfer modifications at L5/S1 secondary to joint replacement. A human cadaveric biomechanical study in which the facet forces and instant axes of rotation (IAR) were measured for different spinal positions under simulated weightbearing conditions before and after total disc replacement at L5/S1 using semiconstrained (3 degrees of freedom [DOF]; Prodisc) and unconstrained (5 DOF; Charité) articulated implants. Twelve radiographically normal human cadaveric L5/S1 joints (age range 45-64 years) were tested before and after disc replacement using Prodisc II implants (Spine Solutions, Paoli, PA) in six specimens and SB Charité III (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) in six other specimens. Semiconstrained fixtures in combination with a servo-hydraulic materials testing system subjected the test specimens to a physiologic combination of compression and anterior shear. Multiple intervertebral positions were studied and included up to 6 degrees of flexion, extension, and lateral bending. The IAR was calculated for every 3-degree intervals, and the force through the facet joints was simultaneously measured using flexible intra-articular sensors. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. During flexion/extension, the average IAR positions and directions were not significantly modified by implantation with the exception that the IAR was higher relative to S1 end plate with the Charité (p=.028). The IAR had a vertically oriented centrode throughout flexion/extension with the Prodisc (p<.001) and the Charité (p<.016). The centrode tended to be greater with the Prodisc. There was a trend that the facet force was decreased throughout flexion/extension for the Prodisc; however, this was statistically significant only at 6 degrees extension (27%, p=.013). In lateral bending, the IAR was significantly modified by Prodisc replacement, with a decreased inclination relative to S1 end plate, (ie, increased coupled axial rotation). While the IAR moved in the horizontal plane toward the side of bending, this effect was more pronounced with the Prodisc. The ipsilateral facet force was significantly increased in 6 degrees lateral bending with the Charité (85%; p=.001). The degree of constraint affects post-implantation kinematics and load transfer. With the Prodisc (3 DOF), the facets were partially unloaded, though the IAR did not match the fixed geometrical center of the UHMWPE. The latter observation suggests joint surface incongruence is developed during movement. With the Charité (5 DOF), the IAR was less variable, yet the facet forces tended to increase, particularly during lateral bending. These results highlight the important role the facets play in guiding movement, and that implant constraint influences facet/implant synergy. The long-term consequences of the differing kinematics on clinically important outcomes such as wear and facet arthritis have yet to be determined.
    The Spine Journal 05/2006; 6(3):258-66. DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.004 · 2.80 Impact Factor