Multiscale simulation of onset plasticity during nanoindentation of Al (001) surface

School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
Acta Materialia (Impact Factor: 3.94). 09/2008; 56(16):4358-4368. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.064

ABSTRACT The onset of plasticity in crystalline materials is important to the fundamental understanding of plastic deformation and the development of precision devices. Dislocation nucleation and interactions at the onset of plasticity are investigated here using a multiscale quasi-continuum (QC) method for the nanoindentation of the (0 0 1) surface of a single crystal aluminium (Al) of 200 × 100 nm2 with infinite thickness. Deformation twinning was noted to occur during the nanoindentation of Al. We used unrelaxed and relaxed QC simulations with three embedded atom potentials of Al to evaluate the generalized planar fault (GPF) energies. The energy barrier for initial dislocation nucleation is much higher than that for subsequent nucleation events adjacent to the pre-existing defect. This mechanism promotes deformation twinning when some of the available slip systems are constrained. Dislocation initiation causes a minor load drop in the load–displacement curve, whereas major displacement excursion from experimental observations is the result of collective dislocation activities. (Some figures in this article are in color only in the on-line version.)

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interactions between edge dislocations and a Sigma 11 symmetrical tilt grain boundary (GB) in face-centred cubic metals of Ni and Al are studied via a quasicontinuum method (QCM). A variety of embedding atom method potentials are used, and the results are compared to previous studies of Cu [W.S. Yu, Z.Q. Wang, Acta Mater., 60 (2012) 5010]. Different potentials do not significantly affect the edge dislocation-GB interactions in these metals. Edge dislocations can easily transmit across grain boundaries in Ni and Cu, even for a single incoming dislocation. However, slip-transmission in Al occurs only after the GB absorbs many incoming dislocations. Stable nucleation of grain boundary dislocations (GBD) in Cu and Ni plays an important role in the slip-transmissions. The slip transmission in Al is found to be difficult due to the metastable nucleation of GBD. The incoming leading and trailing partials in Al are absorbed together by the GB because of the larger values of gamma(sf)/mu b(p) (mu, b(p) and gamma(sf) are the shear modulus, magnitude of Burgers vector of a partial dislocation and the stable stacking fault (SF) energy, respectively). The parameter R = (gamma(usf) - gamma(sf))/mu b(p) (gamma(usf) as the unstable SF energy) [Z.H. Jin et al., Acta. Mater. 56 (2008) 1126] incorporates gamma(sf)/gamma(usf) and gamma(sf)/gamma b(p), and can be used to measure the slip transmission ability of an edge dislocation in these metals. It is also shown that certain loading conditions can help enhance the nucleation of GBDs and GBD dipoles in Al, such that the incoming, leading and trailing partial dislocations can be absorbed separately.
    Philosophical Magazine 05/2014; 94(20):2224-2246. DOI:10.1080/14786435.2014.910318 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quasi-continuum method is applied to investigate the anisotropic behavior of nanoscale adhesive contact when a Ni tip indents into and then pulls out of single crystal Cu substrates. For 1¯10 substrate, the Ni tip exhibits excellent brittle behavior. Interface fracture is mainly characterized by atomic rearrangement since few slip planes are available. For (001) substrate, Shockley partials and deformation twins are both observed during the indentation process. Interface fracture is dominated by atomic slip which leads to the ductile fracture of the interface. As for (111) substrate, the nanocontact leads to significant plastic deformation of the substrate and the piling up of Cu atoms as well as the wetting of the Ni tip. This is because the Ni tip and Cu substrate share the same crystal orientations and the misfit effect between them is less evident. These anisotropic adhesive behaviors illustrate the importance of choosing a proper crystal contact surface to prevent wearing in micro-electro-mechanical systems. Distinctive nanocontact-induced deformation mechanisms and fracture mechanisms are revealed and analyzed. We found that available slip systems should be paid enough attention to for adhesive contact at nanoscale. It is recommended that adhesive contact between the Ni tip and Cu substrate with the same orientations should be avoided in order to reduce wearing. Some of the results found in our work are also validated by similar or related experiments by other researchers.
    Thin Solid Films 09/2014; 566:45–53. DOI:10.1016/j.tsf.2014.07.012 · 1.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A dynamic multiscale simulation based on quasicontinuum method (QC) has been conducted to study the effect of tool geometry in nanometric cutting process of single crystal copper. In the simulation, the many-body EAM potential is used for the interactions between copper atoms in of the workpiece. The simulation captures the atomistic behaviors of material removal mechanisms from the free surface and the mobility of dislocations and their interactions with the computational cost of local atomistic simulation method. Simulations are performed on single crystal copper to study the atomistic details of material removal, chip formation, sub-surface deformation, and machining mechanism. The simulation results demonstrate that tool edge radius has significant effect on chip formation and subsurface deformation, because the effective rake angle varies with the tool edge radius. In addition, different effective rake angles result in different stress states and smoother surface can be obtained under bigger clearance angle. The variations of tangential force, normal force as well as the ratio of normal force to tangential force are obtained to analyze the effects of tool edge radius, rake angle and clearance angle in quantitative way. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier GmbH.
    Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 01/2014; 125(2):682-687. DOI:10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.07.037 · 0.77 Impact Factor


Available from
Nov 9, 2014