Impact of Race on Predialysis Discussions and Kidney Transplant Preemptive Wait-Listing

United States Renal Data System, Rehabilitation/Quality of Life Special Studies Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga., USA.
American Journal of Nephrology (Impact Factor: 2.67). 03/2012; 35(4):305-11. DOI: 10.1159/000336891
Source: PubMed


US registry data have consistently shown that blacks are less likely than whites to be wait-listed before beginning dialysis.
The Comprehensive Dialysis Study (CDS) was a special study conducted by the US Renal Data System (USRDS) in which a national cohort of patients who began maintenance dialysis therapy in 2005-2007 were asked whether kidney transplantation (KT) had been discussed with them before they started dialysis. Using responses from black and white CDS participants and information from the USRDS, we investigated preemptive wait-listing as a function of patient-reported predialysis KT discussion.
Among those reporting early KT discussion, 31.0% of patients preemptively wait-listed were black, compared to 27.5% of those not preemptively wait-listed. Two thirds of preemptively wait-listed patients had received nephrology care more than 12 months before starting dialysis and reported that KT was discussed with them 12 months or more before dialysis. Early KT discussion and higher serum albumin and hemoglobin levels remained significant predictors of preemptive wait-listing in an adjusted logistic regression analysis. Among those preemptively wait-listed, 33% of blacks and 60% of whites had received a transplant by September 30, 2009 (study end date).
Early KT discussion appeared to reduce barriers to black patients' waiting list placement before the start of dialysis, which in turn may facilitate earlier access to a deceased donor organ transplant.

Download full-text


Available from: Kirsten Johansen, Nov 21, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objectives: To reduce racial disparities in transplant, modifiable patient characteristics associated with completion of transplant evaluation and receipt of living donor kidney transplant must be identified. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: From 2004 to 2007, 695 black and white patients were surveyed about 15 less-modifiable and 10 more-modifiable characteristics at evaluation onset; whether they had completed evaluation within 1 year and received living donor kidney transplants by 2010 was determined. Logistic regression and competing risks time-to-event analysis were conducted to determine the variables that predicted evaluation completion and living donor kidney transplant receipt. Results: Not adjusting for covariates, blacks were less likely than whites to complete evaluation (26.2% versus 51.8%, P<0.001) and receive living donor kidney transplants (8.7% versus 21.9%, P<0.001). More-modifiable variables associated with completing evaluation included more willing to be on the waiting list (odds ratio=3.4, 95% confidence interval=2.1, 5.7), more willing to pursue living donor kidney transplant (odds ratio=2.7, 95% confidence interval=1.8, 4.0), having access to more transplant education resources (odds ratio=2.2, 95% confidence interval=1.5, 3.2), and having greater transplant knowledge (odds ratio=1.8, 95% confidence interval=1.2, 2.7). Patients who started evaluation more willing to pursue living donor kidney transplant (hazard ratio=4.3, 95% confidence interval=2.7, 6.8) and having greater transplant knowledge (hazard ratio=1.2, 95% confidence interval=1.1, 1.3) were more likely to receive living donor kidney transplants. Conclusions: Because patients who began transplant evaluation with greater transplant knowledge and motivation were ultimately more successful at receiving transplants years later, behavioral and educational interventions may be very successful strategies to reduce or overcome racial disparities in transplant.
    Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 03/2013; 8(6). DOI:10.2215/CJN.08880812 · 4.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Race and insurance status are seen as potential barriers to health care access and maintenance. Our goal was to see how these, as well as other patient and procedural characteristics, affected our populations' upper extremity vascular access outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed 601 vascular access patients from 2004-2012 in our urban university hospital. We recorded patient demographics, insurance status, comorbidities, and complications. Primary outcomes were reintervention, long-term mortality, and transplantation. Median age was 62 +/-15.8 years and 58% were male. Most operations were arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) (66%). The majority of patients identified themselves as Hispanic (50%), followed by white (22%), and black (19%). Most patients had Medicare only (42%), 31% had private insurance and 27% had Medicaid as their insurance. Black/African American patients were more likely to get an arteriovenous graft (AVG) compared to white and Hispanic patients (44% vs. 28% and 33%, p<0.05). White patients were significantly older (68), than Hispanics (61), or blacks (58). Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 55% with previous tunneled catheter use predictive. Mortality at 5 years was 35% and predicted by age, AVG placement, white race, and not receiving a kidney transplant. Predictors of not receiving a transplant included older age, lower albumin, AVG placement, and coronary artery disease. There were no disparities with insurance status in long-term outcomes in our population. Race was not a factor for reintervention or transplantation, however black/African American patients were more likely have an AVG placed and white patients had a lower long term survival after access placement.
    Annals of Vascular Surgery 12/2013; 28(4). DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.016 · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Preemptive transplantation results in excellent patient and graft survival yet most transplant candidates are referred for transplantation after initiation of dialysis. The goal of this study was to determine barriers to preemptive renal transplantation. Methods: A nonvalidated questionnaire was administered to prospective kidney transplant recipients to determine factors that hindered or favored referral for transplantation before the initiation of dialysis. Results: One hundred ninety-seven subjects referred for a primary renal transplant completed the questionnaire. Ninety-one subjects (46%) had been informed of preemptive transplantation before referral, and 80 (41%) were predialysis at the time of evaluation. The median time from diagnosis of renal disease to referral was 60 months (range, 2-444 months). In bivariate analysis, among other factors, knowledge of preemptive transplantation was highly associated (odds ratio=94.69) with referral before initiation of dialysis. Given the strong association between knowledge of preemptive transplantation and predialysis referral, this variable was not included in the multivariate analysis. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, white recipient race, referral by a transplant nephrologist, recipient employment, and the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease were significantly associated with presentation to the pretransplant clinic before initiation of dialysis. Conclusion: The principle barrier to renal transplantation referral before dialysis was patient education regarding the option of preemptive transplantation. Factors significantly associated with referral before dialysis were the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease, white recipient race, referral by a transplant nephrologist, and employed status. Greater effort should be applied to patient education regarding preemptive transplantation early after the diagnosis of end-stage renal disease.
    Transplantation 07/2014; 99(3). DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000000357 · 3.83 Impact Factor
Show more