Suicide Mortality Among Patients Treated by the Veterans Health Administration From 2000 to 2007

Department of Veterans Affairs, Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC) and Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 03/2012; 102 Suppl 1:S98-104. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300441
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to examine rates of suicide among individuals receiving health care services in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities over an 8-year period.
We included annual cohorts of all individuals who received VHA health care services from fiscal year (FY) 2000 through FY 2007 (October 1, 1999-September 30, 2007; N = 8,855,655). Vital status and cause of death were obtained from the National Death Index.
Suicide was more common among VHA patients than members of the general US population. The overall rates of suicide among VHA patients decreased slightly but significantly from 2000 to 2007 (P < .001). Male veterans between the ages of 30 and 64 years were at the highest risk of suicide.
VHA health care system patients are at elevated risk for suicide and are appropriate for suicide reduction services, although the rate of suicide has decreased in recent years for this group. Comprehensive approaches to suicide prevention in the VHA focus not only on recent returnees from Iraq and Afghanistan but also on middle-aged and older Veterans.

Download full-text


Available from: Kerry L Knox, Jul 31, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to examine risk assessment practices for suicide and unintentional overdose to inform ongoing care in substance use disorder clinics. Focus groups were conducted via telephone among a random sample of treatment providers (N = 19) from Veterans Health Administration substance use disorder clinics across the nation. Themes were coded by research staff. Treatment providers reported consistent and clear guidelines for risk assessment of suicide among patients. Unintentional overdose questions elicited dissimilar responses which indicated a lack of cohesion and uniformity in risk assessment practices across clinics. Suicide risk assessment protocols are cohesively implemented by treatment providers. Unintentional overdose risk, however, may be less consistently assessed in clinics.
    Archives of suicide research: official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research 07/2012; 16(3):250-62. DOI:10.1080/13811118.2012.695273
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suicide in the US Army is a high-profile public health problem that is complex and poorly understood. Adding to the confusion surrounding Army suicide is the challenge of defining and understanding individuals/populations dying by suicide. Data from recent studies have led to a better understanding of risk factors for suicide that may be specifically associated with military service, including the impact of combat and deployment on increased rates of psychiatric illness in military personnel. The next steps involve applying these results to the development of empirically supported suicide prevention approaches specific to the military population. This special article provides an overview of suicide in the Army by synthesizing new information and providing clinical pearls based on research evidence.
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings 09/2012; 87(9):871-8. DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.002 · 5.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To examine primary care clinician actions following positive suicide risk assessments administered to Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans. Methods We identified OEF/OIF veterans with positive templated suicide risk assessments administered in primary care settings of three VA Medical Centers. National VA datasets and manual record review were used to identify and code clinician discussions and actions following positive assessments. Bivariate analyses were used to examine relationships between patient characteristics and discussions of firearms access and alcohol/drug use. Results Primary care clinicians documented awareness of suicide risk assessment results for 157 of 199 (79%) patients with positive assessments. Most patients were assessed for mental health conditions and referred for mental health follow-up. Clinicians documented discussions about firearms access for only 15% of patients. Among patients whose clinicians assessed for substance abuse, 34% received recommendations to reduce alcohol or drug use. Depression diagnoses and suicidal ideation/behavior severity were significantly associated with firearms access discussions, while patient sex, military service branch, and substance abuse diagnoses were significantly associated with recommendations to reduce substance use. Conclusion Greater efforts are needed to understand barriers to clinicians’ assessing, documenting, and counseling once suicidal ideation is detected, and to develop training programs and systems changes to address these barriers.
    General hospital psychiatry 01/2013; 36(3). DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.11.007 · 2.90 Impact Factor