Resting-State Quantitative Electroencephalography Reveals Increased Neurophysiologic Connectivity in Depression

Laboratory of Brain, Behavior, and Pharmacology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 02/2012; 7(2):e32508. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032508
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are hypothesized to arise from dysfunction in brain networks linking the limbic system and cortical regions. Alterations in brain functional cortical connectivity in resting-state networks have been detected with functional imaging techniques, but neurophysiologic connectivity measures have not been systematically examined. We used weighted network analysis to examine resting state functional connectivity as measured by quantitative electroencephalographic (qEEG) coherence in 121 unmedicated subjects with MDD and 37 healthy controls. Subjects with MDD had significantly higher overall coherence as compared to controls in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), and beta (12-20 Hz) frequency bands. The frontopolar region contained the greatest number of "hub nodes" (surface recording locations) with high connectivity. MDD subjects expressed higher theta and alpha coherence primarily in longer distance connections between frontopolar and temporal or parietooccipital regions, and higher beta coherence primarily in connections within and between electrodes overlying the dorsolateral prefrontal cortical (DLPFC) or temporal regions. Nearest centroid analysis indicated that MDD subjects were best characterized by six alpha band connections primarily involving the prefrontal region. The present findings indicate a loss of selectivity in resting functional connectivity in MDD. The overall greater coherence observed in depressed subjects establishes a new context for the interpretation of previous studies showing differences in frontal alpha power and synchrony between subjects with MDD and normal controls. These results can inform the development of qEEG state and trait biomarkers for MDD.


Available from: Andrew F Leuchter, Apr 19, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies had explored the diagnostic and prognostic value of the structural neuroimaging data of MDD and treated the whole brain voxels, the fractional anisotropy and the structural connectivity as classification features. To our best knowledge, no study examined the potential diagnostic value of the hubs of anatomical brain networks in MDD. The purpose of the current study was to provide an exploratory examination of the potential diagnostic and prognostic values of hubs of white matter brain networks in MDD discrimination and the corresponding impaired hub pattern via a multi-pattern analysis. We constructed white matter brain networks from 29 depressions and 30 healthy controls based on diffusion tensor imaging data, calculated nodal measures and identified hubs. Using these measures as features, two types of feature architectures were established, one only included hubs (HUB) and the other contained both hubs and non hubs. The support vector machine classifiers with Gaussian radial basis kernel were used after the feature selection. Moreover, the relative contribution of the features was estimated by means of the consensus features. Our results presented that the hubs (including the bilateral dorsolateral part of superior frontal gyrus, the left middle frontal gyrus, the bilateral middle temporal gyrus, and the bilateral inferior temporal gyrus) played an important role in distinguishing the depressions from healthy controls with the best accuracy of 83.05%. Moreover, most of the HUB consensus features located in the frontal-parieto circuit. These findings provided evidence that the hubs could be served as valuable potential diagnostic measure for MDD, and the hub-concentrated lesion distribution of MDD was primarily anchored within the frontal-parieto circuit.
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging 12/2014; 32(10). DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.037 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: With a life time prevalence estimated at 16%, major depression (MD) is a major public health issue. Previous studies have shown that depression has been associated with a variety of cognitive impairments. In addition to cognitive impairments, major depression is usually accompanied by alterations of cortical activity, especially in prefrontal areas. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of noninvasive brain stimulation as a means of modulating cortical excitability. Recent studies on major depression (MD) have revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation induces cortical excitability which facilitates memory and especially working memory. On the other hand visual aspects of memory in MD have not been yet investigated. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether anodal and cathodal tDCS applied over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), would significantly improve visual memory in patients with major depression. Methods: Thirty (N=30) patients with major depression were randomly assigned to receive either experimental(active) or control (sham) tDCS. The participants underwent a series of visual memory tasks before and after 10 sessions of tDCS. The parameters of active tDCS included 2 mA for 20 minutes per day for 10 consecutive days, anode over the left DLPFC (F3), cathode over the right DLPFC (F4) region. Results: After 10 sessions of anodal and cathodal tDCS, patients showed significantly improved performance in visual and spatial aspects of memory tasks. Specifically, anodal stimulation improved visual memory perfo rmance for the experimental group relative to baseline, whereas sham stimulation did not differentiate performance from baseline in the control group. Conclusion: This study showed that anodal tDCS over DLPFC concurrently with cathodal tDCS over right DLPFC improved visual and spatial aspects of memory in patients with MD. This finding is in generally consistent with previous findings about effectiveness of tDCS on cognition in major depression, while additionally provides support for effectiveness of tDCS on visual memory in MD. Keywords: Major depression, memory, tDCS, visual memory
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many brain diseases or disorders, such as depression, are known to be associated with abnormal functional connectivity in neural networks in the brain. Some bivariate measures of electroencephalography (EEG) for coupling analysis have been used widely in attempts to explain abnormalities related with depression. However, brain network evolution based on persistent functional connections in EEG signals could not be easily unveiled. For a geometrical exploration of brain network evolution, here, we used persistent brain network homology analysis with EEG signals from a corticosterone (CORT)-induced mouse model of depression. EEG signals were obtained from eight cortical regions (frontal, somatosensory, parietal, and visual cortices in each hemisphere). The persistent homology revealed significantly different functional connectivity between the control and CORT model, but no differences in common coupling measures, such as cross correlation and coherence, were apparent. The CORT model showed more localized connectivity and decreased global connectivity than the control. In particular, the somatosensory and parietal cortices were loosely connected in the CORT model. Additionally, the CORT model displayed altered connections among the cortical regions, especially between the frontal and somatosensory cortices, versus the control. This study demonstrates that persistent homology is useful for brain network analysis, and our results indicate that the CORT-induced depression mouse model shows more localized and decreased global connectivity with altered connections, which may facilitate characterization of the abnormal brain network underlying depression.
    NeuroImage 07/2014; 101. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.040 · 6.13 Impact Factor