The role of cognition in cost-effectiveness analyses of behavioral interventions.

University of Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. .
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (Impact Factor: 0.87). 03/2012; 10:3. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Behavioral interventions typically focus on objective behavioral endpoints like weight loss and smoking cessation. In reality, though, achieving full behavior change is a complex process in which several steps towards success are taken. Any progress in this process may also be considered as a beneficial outcome of the intervention, assuming that this increases the likelihood to achieve successful behavior change eventually. Until recently, there has been little consideration about whether partial behavior change at follow-up should be incorporated in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). The aim of this explorative review is to identify CEAs of behavioral interventions in which cognitive outcome measures of behavior change are analyzed.
Data sources were searched for publications before May 2011.
Twelve studies were found eligible for inclusion. Two different approaches were found: three studies calculated separate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cognitive outcome measures, and one study modeled partial behavior change into the final outcome. Both approaches rely on the assumption, be it implicitly or explicitly, that changes in cognitive outcome measures are predictive of future behavior change and may affect CEA outcomes.
Potential value of cognitive states in CEA, as a way to account for partial behavior change, is to some extent recognized but not (yet) integrated in the field. In conclusion, CEAs should consider, and where appropriate incorporate measures of partial behavior change when reporting effectiveness and hence cost-effectiveness.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a new approach to cost analysis of family planning programmes that focuses on behaviour change of programme clients as the final 'output' rather than units of contraceptive services delivered, as does the familiar couple-years-of-protection index. It is useful to know how much it costs to deliver a unit of contraceptive services, but it would also seem useful to know how much it costs to change a prospective client's behaviour. The proposed approach rests on the familiar 'steps to behaviour change' paradigm and: (1) develops a methodology for applying a client-behaviour-change-centred cost analysis to programme activities; (2) tests the methodology and concepts by applying them retrospectively to a case study of mass media interventions in Egypt; (3) derives cost per unit of behaviour changes for these Egyptian communications campaigns to demonstrate the workability of the approach. This framework offers a new approach to impact evaluation that would seem to be applicable to other components of family planning and reproductive health programmes.
    Journal of Biosocial Science 11/2003; 35(4):499-512. · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assessing outcome is a critical problem for the study of addictive behaviors. Traditional approaches often lack power and sensitivity. Latent Transition Analysis is an alternative procedure that is applicable to categorical latent variable models such as stage models. The method involves four different types of parameters, each of which may be relevant to different research questions. Two examples that employ the Stages of Change construct are used to illustrate the method. In the first example, three different models of longitudinal change are compared. In the second example, the effects of an expert system intervention for smoking is compared to a control condition. The method permits the investigation of a series of specific comparisons: (1) the effectiveness of the intervention for individuals in different stages can be assessed; (2) the effectiveness of the intervention can be evaluated for different time intervals; and (3) the effects of intervention on both progression through the stages and regression through the stages or relapse can be assessed. Other potential applications of the method are also discussed.
    Addiction 01/1997; 91 Suppl:S197-209. · 4.58 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 15, 2014