Objective and Subjective Assessment of Edema during Adjuvant Chemotherapy Using Taxane-Containing Regimens in a Randomized Controlled Trial: National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) 02.

Department of Breast Oncology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.42). 03/2012; 82(3):131-8. DOI: 10.1159/000336480
Source: PubMed


To elucidate the time course of taxane-induced edema which may affect the patients' quality of life (QOL).
Our study included the first 300 Japanese patients assigned to 1 of 4 regimens using docetaxel (DTX) or paclitaxel (PTX) by 1:1:1:1 in a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapies for node-positive breast cancer. Patients' QOL was prospectively assessed by the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT)-breast and -taxane (FACT-T) subscale. The scores of FACT items regarding edema and body weight were used as indicators of edema.
The scores for 'anasarca', 'edema of the hands' and 'edema of the legs and feet' of the FACT-T subscale worsened up to 1-2 months after chemotherapy, and body weights increased remarkably until cycle 8 in patients treated with DTX alone (75 mg/m(2), 8 cycles, every 3 weeks). Edema-related symptoms and body weight were relatively stable in the other treatment groups. There were statistically significant differences in the scores of those items and in the changes of body weight both between the DTX-alone group and the other three groups combined, and between the groups using DTX and those using PTX.
Many patients receiving DTX for >4 cycles suffered significantly from edema.

7 Reads

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of healthcare providers is to help patients regain their health and/or maintain or increase their happiness. The quality of healthcare can be assessed objectively by using indices such as survival rates, but subjective assessment is sometimes more important than objective evaluation, because whether patients feel healthy or happy or not is their major concern. Quality of life (QOL) research is a typical approach to subjective assessment of health. Self-administered health-related QOL (HRQOL) questionnaires are used to obtain patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. PRO is defined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as any report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else. PRO data are regarded as more accurate than clinician-rated ones in terms of assessing patients' symptoms and HRQOL. The Comprehensive Support Project for Health Outcome Research of the Public Health Research Foundation has conducted much PRO research in collaboration with the Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research, especially in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Here, we review the results of PRO research in RCTs conducted in Japan and examine future perspectives in this field.
    Breast Cancer 05/2012; 20(4). DOI:10.1007/s12282-012-0368-8 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer can be an irreversible condition with a profound negative impact on quality of life. The lack of consensus regarding standard definitions of clinically significant lymphedema and optimal methods of measurement and quantification are unresolved problems. Inconsistencies persist regarding the appropriate timing of intervention and what forms of treatment should be the standard of care. There are reports that early detection and intervention can prevent progression, however,the Level 1 evidence to support this hypothesis has yet to be generated. To assess these controversies, we propose the implementation of a screening program to detect early lymphedema in conjunction with a randomized, prospective trial designed to generate Level 1 evidence regarding the efficacy of early intervention and appropriate treatment strategies. Collaboration among institutions that manage breast cancer patients is essential to establish a standardized approach to lymphedema and to establish guidelines for best practice.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 06/2013; 88(2). DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.05.001 · 4.03 Impact Factor
Show more