Decision Making Following a Prenatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: An Integrative Review

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7460, USA.
Journal of midwifery & women's health (Impact Factor: 1.07). 03/2012; 57(2):156-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00109.x
Source: PubMed


Prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) is a routine part of prenatal care in many countries, and there is growing interest in the choices women make following a prenatal diagnosis of DS. This review describes what is known about actual and hypothetical decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of DS and adds understanding about the factors that influence women's decision making.
A search of empirical studies was conducted through electronic databases, major journals, and reference lists that were published in English between January 1999 and September 2010. Inclusion criteria were that the research explored attitudes toward continuation of pregnancy or induced abortion for DS and included at least 1 variable that explored factors influencing women's decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of DS. Studies that did not specify DS, unpublished manuscripts, review articles, and book chapters were excluded.
A total of 11 studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The decision to undergo an induced abortion varied depending on whether participants were prospective parents recruited from the general population (23%-33% would terminate), pregnant women at increased risk for having a child with DS (46%-86% would terminate), or women who received a positive diagnosis of DS during the prenatal period (89%-97% terminated). Multiple factors influence women's decision making following a diagnosis of DS, including demographic factors such as religion, maternal age, gestational age, number of existing children, and history of induced abortion. Psychosocial factors including perceived parenting burden/reward, quality of life for a child with DS, attitudes toward and comfort with individuals with disabilities, and support from others also are important influences.
Multiple factors influence the decisions pregnant women make following the diagnosis of fetal DS. Therefore, it is critical that health care providers who work with pregnant women are aware of these factors.

61 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to identify variables that may influence the decision to terminate or continue a pregnancy affected by a chromosome abnormality. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 286 pregnancies diagnosed with a chromosome abnormality following genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. Data obtained included procedure type, chromosome results, ethnicity, maternal age, use of fertility treatments, and uptake of genetic counseling after results, among other factors. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher’s exact test, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used for data analysis. The overall termination rate in this study was 82.9 %. A lower likelihood to terminate was found in pregnancies with a diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality (OR 0.05, p < .0001), Filipina race (OR 0.10, p = .03), and uptake of second genetic counseling session (OR 0.05, p < .0001). Prior history of termination was associated with increased likelihood to terminate (OR 8.6, p = .02). Factors revealing no statistically significant association with termination included maternal age, gestational age, clinic site, fetal gender, ultrasound anomalies, reason for referral and who informed the patient. Our data affirm the complexity of the decision making process and reinforce that providers should refrain from making assumptions regarding a patient’s likelihood to terminate based on factors such as maternal age, gestational age, type of procedure, or ultrasound.
    Journal of Genetic Counseling 09/2012; 22(2). DOI:10.1007/s10897-012-9539-1 · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La survenue dans une famille d’une trisomie 21 occasionne, dans tous les cas, de la souffrance. Suspectée lors du dépistage, confirmée par la génétique, « traitée » par une interruption médicale de grossesse (IMG) dans 92 % des cas, elle laisse une fois sur deux des séquelles post-traumatiques dont l’intensité et la durée dépendront de la qualité de l’accompagnement par les équipes d’obstétrique. En post-natal, une fois dépassée la sidération psychique initiale de l’annonce, les parents déploient des stratégies d’adaptation (humanisation, individuation) pour accueillir ce bébé. Dans la littérature, elles sont évaluées depuis peu comme efficientes, pertinentes (Down’s syndrome advantage). En privilégiant l’intelligence relationnelle et humaine au détriment de la seule intelligence cognitive, les familles permettent la construction de l’identité et le sentiment de bien-être que les porteurs de trisomie 21 déclarent et revendiquent à l’age adulte. Le hiatus se creuse entre une pratique de dépistage systématique, reposant sur le caractère d’extrême gravité de cette affection et ce nouveau regard porté sur la personne trisomique et sa famille.
    42es Journées nationales de la Société Française de Médecine Périnatale (Montpellier 17–19 octobre 2012), 01/2013: pages 111-123; , ISBN: 978-2-8178-0384-5
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: So far, associations between appraisals, maternal adjustment and coping following diagnosis of fetal anomaly have not been investigated in women who continue with their pregnancy. This study measured maternal coping and adjustment after and appraisal of a diagnosis of fetal anomaly in 40 mothers who had continued with their pregnancy using a cross-sectional questionnaire design. Based on retrospective reporting, 35% of participants met full diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder after having received the diagnosis. Women were significantly more depressed (p < .001) and anxious (p < .001) and reported significantly less positive affect (p < .05) after having received the diagnosis in comparison to the time after childbirth. There were no significant differences between emotion- and problem-focused coping. Stressful life events, women's age, number of people providing support and problem-focused coping explained 57.6% of variance in anxiety and depression after childbirth. Satisfaction with social support, emotion-focused and problem-focused coping significantly explained 40.6% of variance in positive affect after childbirth. Following a prenatal diagnosis and for the remainder of their pregnancy, particular attention should be paid to older mothers, those experiencing additional stressful life events and those who are socially isolated, as these women may experience greater distress after childbirth. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Prenatal Diagnosis 12/2013; 33(12). DOI:10.1002/pd.4207 · 3.27 Impact Factor
Show more