Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis following sexual assault in industrialized low-HIV-prevalence countries: a review.

School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Psychology Health and Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.53). 03/2012; 17(2):235-54. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2011.579984
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This review examines and synthesizes the available literature from the past 10 years to determine the true rates of provision and adherence to nPEP regimens in sexual assault survivors in low HIV prevalence, industrialized nations. Findings suggest that further prospective research is necessary to better understand the process of post-assault nPEP evaluation and subsequent follow-up and adherence.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comprehensive data that address current HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) practices in the emergency care of sexual assault patients are limited. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released HIV nPEP guidelines in 2005 and updated guidelines for Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment in 2006 and 2010, each of which support providing nPEP to sexual assault patients. This study examined the offer, acceptance, and adherence rates of nPEP among sexual assault patients treated at an emergency department (ED).
    Women s Health Issues 07/2014; 24(4):e407-12. DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2014.04.003 · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This cross-sectional study describes sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE)/forensic nurse examiner (FNE) program practices related to HIV testing, nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP), and common barriers to offering HIV testing and nPEP. A convenience sample of 174 SANE/FNE programs in the United States and Canada was drawn from the International Association of Forensic Nurses database, and program coordinators completed Web-based surveys. Three fourths of programs had nPEP policies, 31% provided HIV testing, and 63% offered nPEP routinely or upon request. Using χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests, a greater proportion of Canadian programs had an nPEP protocol (p = .010), provided HIV testing (p = .004), and offered nPEP (p = .0001) than U.S.-based programs. Program coordinators rated providing pre- and/or posttest counseling and follow-up as the most important barrier to HIV testing, and medication costs as the most important barrier to providing nPEP. Our results indicate HIV-related services are offered inconsistently across SANE/FNE programs.
    The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care: JANAC 10/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.jana.2013.07.001 · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), which is designed to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection after an exposure, is one of several strategies for HIV prevention. PEP was first used after occupational HIV exposures in the late 1980s, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issuing the first set of guidelines that included considerations regarding the use of antiretroviral agents for PEP after occupational HIV exposures in 1990. Use of PEP has been extended to nonoccupational exposures, including after sexual contact or injection-drug use. This article provides a rationale for PEP, assessment of the need for PEP, and details of its implementation.
    Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 10/2014; 28(4). DOI:10.1016/j.idc.2014.08.005 · 2.31 Impact Factor