Article

Suicide risk assessment in clinical practice: Pragmatic guidelines for imperfect assessments

Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77080, USA.
Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice Training (Impact Factor: 3.01). 03/2012; 49(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1037/a0026148
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This practice review focuses on the challenges of conducting sensitive and accurate assessments of the relative risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides. Suicide and suicide attempts are a frequently encountered clinical crisis, and the assessment, management, and treatment of suicidal patients is one of the most stressful tasks for clinicians. An array of risk factors, warning signs, and protective factors associated with suicide risk are reviewed; however, we are not yet in possession of evidence-based diagnostic tests that can accurately predict suicide risk on an individual level without also creating an inordinate number of false-positive predictions. Given the current limitations of assessment strategies, clinicians are advised to keep in mind that patients contemplating suicide are under enormous psychological distress, requiring sensitive and thoughtful engagement during the assessment process. An overarching goal of these assessments should be conducted within the therapeutic frame, in which efforts are made to enhance the therapeutic alliance by negotiating a collaborative approach to assessing risk and understanding why thoughts of suicide are so compelling. Within this treatment heuristic, the Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T) is recommended as a pragmatic multidimensional assessment protocol incorporating the best known risk and protective factors.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: James Christopher Fowler, Jan 02, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
174 Views
  • Source
    • "Furthermore , throughout this paper , we referred to suicide risk by measuring hopelessness as a proxy of such risk . This is a limitation because , despite its predictive value , hopelessness is a marker that can indicate false positives when assessing suicide risk , while several other contributing factors can increase suicide risk ( Pompili 2010 ; Fowler 2012 ) . This points to the fact that our emphasis on suicide risk using the measurement of hopelessness could be mitigated by taking into account contributing factors that were not part of the data collection for this study . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Immigrants may experience several negative consequences as a result of their migration including discrimination, unsatisfactory economic conditions, and rejection from the host countries, which may contribute to psychiatric illness and vulnerability to suicidal behaviors. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether or not the theorized components of measured dimensions of suicide risk and psychopathology vary across samples of Italians and immigrants. METHODS: We investigated 237 Italians and 234 immigrants, who were administered self-report questionnaires to assess temperament (TEMPS-A), hopelessness (BHS), personality (EPQ-R), and self-other perception (9AP). RESULTS: Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses were conducted, which yielded a final model with an excellent fit to the data (χ ((53)) (2) = 57.56; CFI = 0.994; RMSEA = 0.014). This final model fits significantly better than the previously tested models and indicated that the same pattern of relationships was found between suicide risk and psychopathology across both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although immigrants represent a unique population and may experience specific stressors contributing to psychopathology and suicide risk, our findings suggest that the samples of Italians and immigrants may be more similar on the study variables under investigation than previously thought. Implications are offered for the improved identification and treatment of immigrants and resident citizens in Europe in general and in Italy in particular.
    Social Psychiatry 10/2012; DOI:10.1007/s00127-012-0608-4 · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Furthermore , throughout this paper , we referred to suicide risk by measuring hopelessness as a proxy of such risk . This is a limitation because , despite its predictive value , hopelessness is a marker that can indicate false positives when assessing suicide risk , while several other contributing factors can increase suicide risk ( Pompili 2010 ; Fowler 2012 ) . This points to the fact that our emphasis on suicide risk using the measurement of hopelessness could be mitigated by taking into account contributing factors that were not part of the data collection for this study . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Occupational stress is a multivariate process involving sources of pressure, psycho-physiological distress, locus of control, work dissatisfaction, depression, anxiety, mental health disorders, hopelessness, and suicide ideation. Healthcare professionals are known for higher rates of occupational-related distress (burnout and compassion fatigue) and higher rates of suicide. The purpose of this study was to explain the relationships between occupational stress and some psychopathological dimensions in a sample of health professionals. We investigated 156 nurses and physicians, 62 males and 94 females, who were administered self-report questionnaires to assess occupational stress [occupational stress inventory (OSI)], temperament (temperament evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego autoquestionnaire), and hopelessness (Beck hopelessness scale). The best Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes model with five OSI predictors yielded the following results: χ(2)(9) = 14.47 (p = 0.11); χ(2)/df = 1.60; comparative fit index = 0.99; root mean square error of approximation = 0.05. This model provided a good fit to the empirical data, showing a strong direct influence of casual variables such as work dissatisfaction, absence of type A behavior, and especially external locus of control, psychological and physiological distress on latent variable psychopathology. Occupational stress is in a complex relationship with temperament and hopelessness and also common among healthcare professionals.
    Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 05/2012; 16(2). DOI:10.3109/10253890.2012.689896 · 3.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study explored a psychodynamic model for suicide risk by examining risk factors for medically serious suicide attempts, including assessments of affect flooding, negative self-schema / fragmentation, and impaired reality testing, closely approximating Maltsberger's psycho-dynamic formulation of suicide crisis. Baseline risk factors including age, gender, psychiatric symptoms, high-risk behaviors, and the Implicit Risk for Suicide Index (IRSI) were used to detect medically serious suicide attempts monitored for up to a year after the assessment. Twenty-five psychiatric inpatients who made life-threatening suicide attempts after assessment were compared to 25 inpatients and 25 psychotherapy outpatients who made no suicide attempts during follow-up. Statistical analysis revealed that a history of at least one suicide attempt and elevated IRSI scores accounted for 60 percent of the variance in detecting medically serious suicide attempts. Elevated IRSI accurately identified suicide attempt status above and beyond past suicide attempts and other empirically validated risk factors. Results are discussed in light of psychodynamic formulations of suicide risk.
    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 04/2012; 60(3):555-76. DOI:10.1177/0003065112442240 · 0.79 Impact Factor
Show more