Article

Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.44). 03/2012; 47(2):115-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There has been a rapid growth in recent years of available technologies for individuals with communication difficulties. Research in the area is currently underdeveloped with practitioners having a limited body of work on which to draw to guide the process of intervention. Concerns have been raised that this newly developed technology may have limited functional usage.
This review aims to investigate the potential barriers and facilitators to high-technology AAC provision and its ongoing use. The aim of the analysis is to explore factors underpinning use rather than effectiveness, thus it synthesized data from predominantly qualitative and survey studies reporting the views and perceptions of AAC users or staff providing the devices.
The review highlights the range of factors that can impact on provision and use of high-technology AAC, which practitioners should consider and address as appropriate in the intervention process. These include: ease of use of the device; reliability; availability of technical support; voice/language of the device; decision-making process; time taken to generate a message; family perceptions and support; communication partner responses; service provision; and knowledge and skills of staff. The work outlines how qualitative synthesis review methods may be applied to the consideration of published material that is not reporting outcomes data, and how this may provide valuable information to inform future studies.
Practitioners should be aware of barriers and facilitators to successful use when making recommendations, and consider how barriers where present might be overcome. Aspects of service delivery such as ongoing technical support and staff training may require further consideration. The synthesis of evidence describing views of users and providers, and the implementation of high-technology AAC systems, can provide valuable data to inform intervention studies and functional outcome measures.

6 Bookmarks
 · 
291 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alan Martin, the first author of this paper, has cerebral palsy and uses a voice output communication aid (VOCA) to speak, and this paper describes the personal experience of living 'through' a computer voice (or VOCA) in the form of an interview of Mr Martin conducted by Dr Newell. The interview focuses on the computerized voice output rather than other features of the VOCA. In presenting a first-hand account of the experience of actually using VOCA, the intention is that both everyday, practical issues of the technology and broader imaginative, philosophical, and sociological implications will be explored. Based upon the interview, the authors offer an informal set of design requirements and recommendations for the development of future VOCAs.
    Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology 07/2013;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Current technologies provide individuals with complex communication needs with a powerful array of communication, information, organization, and social networking options. However, there is the danger that the excitement over these new devices will result in a misplaced focus on the technology, to the neglect of what must be the central focus - the people with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). In order to truly harness the power of technology, rehabilitation and educational professionals must ensure that AAC intervention is driven, not by the devices, but rather by the communication needs of the individual. Furthermore, those involved in AAC research and development activities must ensure that the design of AAC technologies is driven by an understanding of motor, sensory, cognitive, and linguistic processing, in order to minimize learning demands and maximize communication power for individuals with complex communication needs across the life span.
    Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985) 12/2013; 29(4):299-309. · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To explore parents' perceptions of existing support for families with a new speech generating device (SGD). Method: Six Australian parents of school-aged children who used an SGD participated in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of SGD support. Data were explored and compared using narrative analysis. Results: Participants discussed barriers to service access, including long waiting lists, service exclusion policies and limited therapist expertise in SGD practice. They emphasized the value of ongoing service coordination for families. Finally, participants discussed the nature of role boundaries and responsibilities for parents vs. therapists in the intervention process and the impact that intervention approaches had on parent autonomy, empowerment and confidence. Conclusion: Having an SGD at home generates ongoing support needs, which had not been well met for some parents in our study. Results suggest that timely, well coordinated and family-centred support may enhance service experience for families with a new device.
    Developmental neurorehabilitation 12/2013;

Full-text

View
71 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014