Xirp Proteins Mark Injured Skeletal Muscle in Zebrafish

University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 02/2012; 7(2):e31041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Myocellular regeneration in vertebrates involves the proliferation of activated progenitor or dedifferentiated myogenic cells that have the potential to replenish lost tissue. In comparison little is known about cellular repair mechanisms within myocellular tissue in response to small injuries caused by biomechanical or cellular stress. Using a microarray analysis for genes upregulated upon myocellular injury, we identified zebrafish Xin-actin-binding repeat-containing protein1 (Xirp1) as a marker for wounded skeletal muscle cells. By combining laser-induced micro-injury with proliferation analyses, we found that Xirp1 and Xirp2a localize to nascent myofibrils within wounded skeletal muscle cells and that the repair of injuries does not involve cell proliferation or Pax7(+) cells. Through the use of Xirp1 and Xirp2a as markers, myocellular injury can now be detected, even though functional studies indicate that these proteins are not essential in this process. Previous work in chicken has implicated Xirps in cardiac looping morphogenesis. However, we found that zebrafish cardiac morphogenesis is normal in the absence of Xirp expression, and animals deficient for cardiac Xirp expression are adult viable. Although the functional involvement of Xirps in developmental and repair processes currently remains enigmatic, our findings demonstrate that skeletal muscle harbours a rapid, cell-proliferation-independent response to injury which has now become accessible to detailed molecular and cellular characterizations.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Smyth line (SL) chicken is the only animal model for autoimmune vitiligo that spontaneously displays all clinical and biological manifestations of the human disorder. To understand the genetic component underlying the susceptibility to develop SL vitiligo (SLV), whole genome resequencing analysis was performed in SL chickens with confirmed SLV expression and compared with parental Brown line (BL) chickens, which maintain a very low incidence rate of vitiligo. Illumina sequencing technology and reference based assembly on Red Jungle Fowl genome sequences were used. Results of genome resequencing of pooled DNA of each 10 BL and SL chickens reached 5.1x and 7.0x coverage, respectively, of the Red Jungle Fowl reference chicken genome. Through a series of filtering processes, totally ~1 million unique SNPs were found in SL alone. Eventually 156 reliable marker SNPs, which can induce non-synonymous mutations in amino acid sequences over 139 genes. Bioinformatic study of the 156 most reliable marker SNPs included factors involving dermatological diseases and conditions such as ADAMTS13, ASPM, ATP6V0A2, BRCA2, COL12A1, GRM5, LRP2, OBSCN, PLAU, RNF168, STAB2, and XIRP1. Gene network analysis, which represents the intermolecular connections, revealed that vitiligo development appeared to be associated with the interactions with protein kinases (MAPK, ERK1/2, PKC, PRKDC), phosphatase (PPP1CA), ubiquitinylation (UBC) and amyloid production (APP). The genetic markers and bioinformatics interpretations of amino acid mutation found in SLV chickens may provide insight into the genetic component responsible for the progression of autoimmune vitiligo. This work was supported by Arkansas Bioscience Institute and Arkansas Agricultural Experimental Station.
    International Plant and Animal Genome Conference XXII 2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various experimental approaches have been used in mouse to induce muscle injury with the aim to study muscle regeneration, including myotoxin injections (bupivacaine, cardiotoxin or notexin), muscle transplantations (denervation-devascularization induced regeneration), intensive exercise, but also murine muscular dystrophy models such as the mdx mouse (for a review of these approaches see (1)). In zebrafish, genetic approaches include mutants that exhibit muscular dystrophy phenotypes (such as runzel(2) or sapje(3)) and antisense oligonucleotide morpholinos that block the expression of dystrophy-associated genes(4). Besides, chemical approaches are also possible, e.g. with Galanthamine, a chemical compound inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, thereby resulting in hypercontraction, which eventually leads to muscular dystrophy(5). However, genetic and pharmacological approaches generally affect all muscles within an individual, whereas the extent of physically inflicted injuries are more easily controlled spatially and temporally(1). Localized physical injury allows the assessment of contralateral muscle as an internal control. Indeed, we recently used laser-mediated cell ablation to study skeletal muscle regeneration in the zebrafish embryo(6), while another group recently reported the use of a two-photon laser (822 nm) to damage very locally the plasma membrane of individual embryonic zebrafish muscle cells(7). Here, we report a method for using the micropoint laser (Andor Technology) for skeletal muscle cell injury in the zebrafish embryo. The micropoint laser is a high energy laser which is suitable for targeted cell ablation at a wavelength of 435 nm. The laser is connected to a microscope (in our setup, an optical microscope from Zeiss) in such a way that the microscope can be used at the same time for focusing the laser light onto the sample and for visualizing the effects of the wounding (brightfield or fluorescence). The parameters for controlling laser pulses include wavelength, intensity, and number of pulses. Due to its transparency and external embryonic development, the zebrafish embryo is highly amenable for both laser-induced injury and for studying the subsequent recovery. Between 1 and 2 days post-fertilization, somitic skeletal muscle cells progressively undergo maturation from anterior to posterior due to the progression of somitogenesis from the trunk to the tail(8, 9). At these stages, embryos spontaneously twitch and initiate swimming. The zebrafish has recently been recognized as an important vertebrate model organism for the study of tissue regeneration, as many types of tissues (cardiac, neuronal, vascular etc.) can be regenerated after injury in the adult zebrafish(10, 11).
    Journal of Visualized Experiments 01/2013; DOI:10.3791/4351
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The cellular basis for mammalian muscle regeneration has been an area of intense investigation over the last few decades. Consensus has been reached that a specialized self-renewing stem cell termed the satellite cell plays the major role during the process of regeneration in amniotes. How broadly deployed this mechanism is within the vertebrate phylogeny remains an open question. This lack of information on the role of analogous cells to the satellite cell in other vertebrate systems is even more surprising given the fact that that satellite cells were first designated in frogs. An intriguing aspect of this debate is the fact that a number of amphibia and many fish species have been shown to exhibit epimorphic regenerative processes in specific tissues, whereby regeneration occurs by the dedifferentiation of the damaged tissue itself, and does not deploy specialized stem cell populations analogous to satellite cells. Hence it is feasible that a cellular process completely distinct to that deployed during mammalian muscle regeneration could operate in species capable of epimorphic regeneration. In this review we examine the evidence for or against the broad phylogenetic distribution of satellite cells. We conclude that in the vertebrates so far examined, epimorphosis does not appear to be deployed during muscle regeneration, and that analogous cells expressing similar marker genes to satellite cells appear to be deployed during the regenerative process. However, the functional definition of these cells as self-renewing muscle stem cells remains a final hurdle to the definition of the satellite cell as a generic vertebrate cell type. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    FEBS Journal 04/2013; 280(17). DOI:10.1111/febs.12300 · 3.99 Impact Factor
Show more