Article

Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human dorsal extrastriate cortex

C. & O. Vogt Institute for Brain Research, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Brain Structure and Function (Impact Factor: 4.57). 02/2012; 218(1). DOI: 10.1007/s00429-012-0390-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The dorsal visual stream consists of several functionally specialized areas, but most of their cytoarchitectonic correlates have not yet been identified in the human brain. The cortex adjacent to Brodmann area 18/V2 was therefore analyzed in serial sections of ten human post-mortem brains using morphometrical and multivariate statistical analyses for the definition of areal borders. Two previously unknown cytoarchitectonic areas (hOc3d, hOc4d) were detected. They occupy the medial and, to a smaller extent, lateral surface of the occipital lobe. The larger area, hOc3d, is located dorso-lateral to area V2 in the region of superior and transverse occipital, as well as parieto-occipital sulci. Area hOc4d was identified rostral to hOc3d; it differed from the latter by larger pyramidal cells in lower layer III, thinner layers V and VI, and a sharp cortex-white-matter borderline. The delineated areas were superimposed in the anatomical MNI space, and probabilistic maps were calculated. They show a relatively high intersubject variability in volume and position. Based on their location and neighborhood relationship, areas hOc3d and hOc4d are putative anatomical substrates of functionally defined areas V3d and V3a, a hypothesis that can now be tested by comparing probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and activation studies of the living human brain.

Full-text

Available from: Simon B Eickhoff, Jan 23, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
146 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF) is the only major fiber bundle connecting dorsolateral and ventrolateral visual cortex. Only a handful of studies have examined the anatomy of the VOF or its role in cognition in the living human brain. Here, we trace the contentious history of the VOF, beginning with its original discovery in monkey by Wernicke (1881) and in human by Obersteiner (1888), to its disappearance from the literature, and recent reemergence a century later. We introduce an algorithm to identify the VOF in vivo using diffusion-weighted imaging and tractography, and show that the VOF can be found in every hemisphere (n = 74). Quantita-tive T1 measurements demonstrate that tissue properties, such as myelination, in the VOF differ from neighboring white-matter tracts. The terminations of the VOF are in consistent positions rela-tive to cortical folding patterns in the dorsal and ventral visual streams. Recent findings demonstrate that these same anatomical locations also mark cytoarchitectonic and functional transitions in dorsal and ventral visual cortex. We conclude that the VOF is likely to serve a unique role in the communication of signals between regions on the ventral surface that are important for the perception of visual categories (e.g., words, faces, bodies, etc.) and regions on the dorsal surface involved in the control of eye movements, atten-tion, and motion perception. diffusion-weighted imaging | vertical occipital fasciculus | perpendicular fasciculus | quantitative T1 T he vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF) is the only major fiber bundle connecting dorsal and ventral regions of occipital, parietal, and temporal cortex. The signals carried by the VOF are likely to play an essential role in an array of visual and cognitive functions. Characterizing the VOF connections and tissue structure in the living human brain is important for the study of human vision and cognitive neuroscience alike. Carl Wernicke discovered the VOF (1). For the next 30 y, the VOF was included in many major neuroanatomy atlases and journal articles (1–14). However, Wernicke's study contradicted a widely accepted principle of white-matter organization pro-posed by Meynert, Wernicke's mentor. Over the subsequent decades, there emerged a camp of neuroanatomists who ac-knowledged Wernicke's discovery and another group that, like Meynert, disregarded the discovery. Due to its controversial beginnings, haphazard naming convention, and the difficulty of standardizing postmortem procedures, the VOF largely dis-appeared from the literature for most of the next century. A century later, Yeatman et al. (15) rediscovered the VOF using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI); they were the first to characterize the VOF cortical projections in the living, behaving, human brain. Why would such an important pathway disappear from the literature for so long? The disappearance can be traced to con-troversies and confusions among some of the most prominent neuroanatomists of the 19th century (1–13, 16–18). Modern, in vivo, MRI measurements and algorithms allow for precise, re-producible, scalable computations that can resolve these century-old debates and provide novel insight into the architecture of the VOF in the living human brain. This article is divided into five sections. First, we review the history of the VOF from its discovery in the late 1800s (1) through the early 1900s. Second, we link the historical images of the VOF to the first identification of the VOF in vivo (15). Third, we describe an open-source algorithm that uses dMRI data and fiber tractography to automate labeling of the VOF in human (github.com/jyeatman/AFQ/tree/master/vof). Fourth, we quantify the location and cortical projections of the VOF with respect to macroanatomical landmarks in ventral (VOT) and lateral (LOT) occipito-temporal cortices. Fifth, we report in vivo histological measurements, using quantitative T1 mapping, which differentiate VOF tissue properties from surrounding pathways. We conclude by discussing how computational neu-roanatomy improves the clarity of tract definition and re-producibility of anatomical results.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 11/2014; 111(48). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1418503111 · 9.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neurobiological organization of action-oriented working memory is not well understood. To elucidate the neural correlates of translating visuo-spatial stimulus sequences into delayed (memory-guided) sequential actions, we measured brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants encoded sequences of four to seven dots appearing on fingers of a left or right schematic hand. After variable delays, sequences were to be reproduced with the corresponding fingers. Recall became less accurate with longer sequences and was initiated faster after long delays. Across both hands, encoding and recall activated bilateral prefrontal, premotor, superior and inferior parietal regions as well as the basal ganglia, whereas hand-specific activity was found (albeit to a lesser degree during encoding) in contralateral premotor, sensorimotor, and superior parietal cortex. Activation differences after long versus short delays were restricted to motor-related regions, indicating that rehearsal during long delays might have facilitated the conversion of the memorandum into concrete motor programs at recall. Furthermore, basal ganglia activity during encoding selectively predicted correct recall. Taken together, the results suggest that to-be-reproduced visuo-spatial sequences are encoded as prospective action representations (motor intentions), possibly in addition to retrospective sensory codes. Overall, our study supports and extends multi-component models of working memory, highlighting the notion that sensory input can be coded in multiple ways depending on what the memorandum is to be used for. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 07/2014; 35(7). DOI:10.1002/hbm.22415 · 6.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The cortical surface is organized into a large number of cortical areas; however, these areas have not been comprehensively mapped in the human. Abrupt transitions in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) patterns can noninvasively identify locations of putative borders between cortical areas (RSFC-boundary mapping; Cohen et al. 2008). Here we describe a technique for using RSFC-boundary maps to define parcels that represent putative cortical areas. These parcels had highly homogenous RSFC patterns, indicating that they contained one unique RSFC signal; furthermore, the parcels were much more homogenous than a null model matched for parcel size when tested in two separate datasets. Several alternative parcellation schemes were tested this way, and no other parcellation was as homogenous as or had as large a difference compared with its null model. The boundary map-derived parcellation contained parcels that overlapped with architectonic mapping of areas 17, 2, 3, and 4. These parcels had a network
    Cerebral Cortex 10/2014; DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhu239 · 8.31 Impact Factor