Article

Transoral robotic surgery using the thulium:YAG laser: a prospective study.

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery (Impact Factor: 1.92). 02/2012; 138(2):158-66. DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2011.1199
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare thulium:YAG laser-assisted transoral robotic surgery (TY:TORS) and conventional electrocautery-equipped TORS (EC:TORS) in patients undergoing transoral resection of upper aerodigestive tract malignant neoplasms.
Prospective matched cohort study.
Tertiary academic referral center.
Fifteen patients undergoing TY:TORS were matched on the basis of tumor site, clinical T stage, sex, and age with 30 control subjects undergoing EC:TORS.
The primary outcome was a comparison between the feasibility of TY:TORS compared with EC:TORS. The secondary outcome was a comparison between the safety and functional outcome of TY:TORS compared with EC:TORS in patients undergoing resection of upper aerodigestive tract malignant neoplasms.
All the tumors underwent complete excision with negative margins. Estimated blood loss was minimal (<150 mL) for 87% of TY:TORS patients (13 of 15) and 63% of EC:TORS controls (19 or 30). Intraoperative pharyngotomy was reported in 8% of TY:TORS patients (1 of 13) and 42% of EC:TORS controls (11 of 30) (P = .03). Postoperative pain was greater in EC:TORS compared with TY:TORS (P = .02). No statistically significant differences were noted in hemostasis, postoperative bleeding rates, or other complications.
Compared with EC:TORS, TY:TORS seems feasible and safe. In addition, TY:TORS resulted in fewer intraoperative pharyngotomies and less postoperative pain than did EC:TORS, which may be because of decreased collateral thermal damage, improved visualization, and finer cutting using the thulium laser.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
96 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Objective Current resection modalities for oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) vary from cold steel over CO2 laser to monopolar electro-surgery (MO). We compared thulium laser (TL) as a new modality with MO with regards to pathological assessment.Study Design/Materials and Methods Forty-two patients who were treated for OSCC by either TL or MO were included. All resected specimens were assessed with special attention to margin interpretation and thermal damage.ResultsDepth of thermal damage ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 mm in the TL group compared to 1.0–4.0 mm in the MO group without interfering with the pathological assessment. The percentage of positive margin resections was three times higher in the MO group compared with the TL group.Conclusions This study shows resections done by TL do not impair pathological assessment when compared to MO resections. Lasers Surg. Med. 9999:XX–XX, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 10/2014; 46(8). DOI:10.1002/lsm.22270 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To report a single institution's experience with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and its clinical outcomes. This was a retrospective study carried out at a university-affiliated teaching hospital. Subjects and Methods: Forty-four consecutive TORS patients with benign and malignant diseases were reviewed. Data on demographics, clinical parameters, and diet were collected. Surgical margins, local and regional recurrence, distant metastasis, 2-year disease-free survival rate, and 2-year survival data were reviewed for the malignant cases. Results: Nine benign and 35 proven squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) cases underwent TORS. The set-up time was 17.12 minutes (range, 10-40 minutes), and operative time was 53 minutes (range, 10-300 minutes). Average length of stay was 2.5 days. There were seven (6.8%) grade 3 surgical complications. Surgical infection rate was 2.3%. Benign cases were on a regular diet after TORS. Of the malignant cases, 94% were taking peroral diet immediately after the TORS procedure. There were no intraoperative complications and no 30-day postoperative mortalities. The mean follow-up time was 25.2 months (range, 16-38 months) for malignant disease. The SCCA sites were in the oropharynx (30/35), larynx (2/35), and unknown primary with neck metastasis (3/35). Unknown primary patients were excluded in the surgical margin analyses. Negative margins were achieved in 91% of cases. The local and regional recurrence rates were 6.3% (2/32) and 3.1% (1/32), respectively. Two patients (6.3%) developed distant metastasis. Oropharyngeal SCCA cases were reviewed, of which 23 were human papillomavirus (HPV)/p16 positive and 7 were HPV/p16 negative. The 2-year actual survival for HPV-positive and -negative patients was 96% (22/23) and 86% (6/7), respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival for HPV-positive and -negative cases was 91% (21/23) and 71.4% (5/7), respectively. All malignant cases that underwent TORS received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: TORS is a safe procedure with minimal complications and acceptable clinical and functional outcomes.
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 10/2013; DOI:10.1089/lap.2013.0261 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Summarize functional outcomes after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) ± adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). A systematic review was conducted. The MEDLINE database was searched (MeSH terms: TORS, pharyngeal neoplasms, oropharyngeal neoplasms). Peer-reviewed human subject papers published through December 2013 were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) case report design (n < 10), (2) review article, or (3) technical, animal, or cadaver studies. Functional outcomes extracted included feeding tube dependence, swallow examination findings, speech ratings, velopharyngeal insufficiency, pneumonia, and oral intake measures. Twelve papers comprising 441 patients with OPC treated with TORS ± adjuvant therapy were included. Feeding tube rates were the most commonly reported functional outcome. Excluding prophylactic placement, 18-39 % of patients required gastrostomy placement, typically during adjuvant therapy. Chronic gastrostomy dependence ranged from 0 to 7 % (mean follow-up 11-26 months), regardless of disease stage. Composite MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores ranged from 65.2 to 78 (89 patients, 3 series, mean follow-up 12-13 months). Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies were not systematically reported. Incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 0-7 %. Predictors of swallowing function included baseline function, T-stage, N-stage, tongue base primary tumors, and adjuvant chemoradiation. Rates of transient hypernasality were 4-9 %. A single study suggested dose-dependent effects of adjuvant therapy (none, radiation alone, chemoradiation) on diet scores at 6 and 12 months. Crude end points of functional recovery after TORS ± adjuvant therapy suggest promising swallowing outcomes, depending on the functional measure reported.
    Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 03/2014; 272(2). DOI:10.1007/s00405-014-2985-7 · 1.61 Impact Factor