Article

Gastroesophageal reflux in pediatrics; (patho)physiology and new insights in diagnostics and treatment.

Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children Hospital/, Academy Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherland.
Minerva pediatrica (Impact Factor: 0.72). 02/2012; 64(1):101-19.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT GER is the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus and is referred to as GER disease (GERD) when GER causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. GERD in infants and children is sometimes difficult to diagnose and even more difficult to treat. The diagnosis of GERD is hampered by the fact that GER symptoms such as irritability and crying, feed refusal and regurgitation are common problems in infants and these symptoms are not specific for GERD. Diagnostic criteria for the objective diagnosis of GERD with commonly used diagnostic tests such as pH-metry, pH-impedance monitoring and endoscopy are poorly or not defined. In this review the current understanding of (patho)physiology of GERD, clinical history in infants and children, new insights in diagnostic modalities and the role of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions are discussed.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Taher Omari, Aug 27, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
119 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in otherwise healthy older children and adolescents is commonly encountered in pediatric clinics and poses a complex treatment problem involving changes of diets and lifestyle. After an initial history taking and a physical examination, typical symptoms of GERD in older children and adolescenct are initially treated with the trials of acid suppressants. With an increase of severe cases, more and more GERD children have been evaluated with endoscopy, which helps to delineate an erosive esophagitis from a non-erosive reflux disease as they are presumed to have different pathogenesis. For the pediatric patients without a significant underlying disease, a reflux esophagitis can be treated adequately with acid suppressants. Recently, the rapid increase of children who are taking anti-reflux medication has brought up a serious alarm among pediatricians. Some at risk pediatric patients with recurrent and/or chronic GERD have been linked to adulthood GERD. In this paper, pediatric GERD with and without erosive esophagitis was reviewed along with treatment options and issues specifically for the otherwise healthy older children and adolescents in the primary clinics or the secondary hospitals.
    12/2012; 15(4):220-228. DOI:10.5223/pghn.2012.15.4.220
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used diagnostic tests over conventional history taking and physical examination in children ≤18 months and >18 months suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). STUDY DESIGN: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pH-metry, pH-impedance, esophagogastroscopy, barium contrast study, scintigraphy, and empirical treatment as diagnostic tools. Quality was assessed according to Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews criteria. RESULTS: Of the 2178 studies found, 6 studies were included, containing 408 participants (age 1 month-13.6 years) and 145 controls (age 1 month-16.9 years). Studies included children with GERD symptoms; 1 included an atypical presentation. In all the studies, the diagnostic accuracy of pH-metry was investigated, and in 2 studies esophagogastroscopy was investigated as well. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated in 3 studies. The range of reported sensitivity and specificity was broad and unreliable because of poor methodological quality according to Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews criteria and inadequate study design. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of tests in children suspected of GERD remains unclear and implications for practice are hard to give. There is an urgent need of well-designed randomized controlled trials where the effect of treatment according to specific signs and symptoms will be compared with the effect of treatment based on the results of additional diagnostic tests, for patient relevant outcomes.
    The Journal of pediatrics 12/2012; 162(5). DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.041 · 3.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) is the most common esophageal disorder in children. Achalasia occurs less commonly but has similar symptoms to GERD. A nine-year old boy presented with vomiting, heartburn, and nocturnal cough. The esophageal impedance-pH monitor revealed nonacidic GERD (all-refluxate clearance percent time of 20.9%). His symptoms persisted despite medical treatment for GERD, and he was lost to follow up. Four years later, he presented with heartburn, solid-food dysphagia, daily post-prandial vomiting, and failure to thrive. Endoscopy showed a severely dilated esophagus with candidiasis. High-resolution manometry was performed, and he was diagnosed with classic achalasia (also known as type I). His symptoms resolved after two pneumatic dilatation procedures, and his weight and height began to catch up to his peers. Clinicians might consider using high-resolution manometry in children with atypical GERD even after evaluation with an impedance-pH monitor.
    03/2015; 18(1):55-9. DOI:10.5223/pghn.2015.18.1.55