Pharmacological ER stress promotes hepatic lipogenesis and lipid droplet formation

American Journal of Translational Research (Impact Factor: 3.23). 01/2012; 4(1):102-13.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress refers to a condition of accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen. A variety of biochemical stimuli or pathophysiologic conditions can directly or indirectly induce ER stress, leading to activation of an ER-originated adaptive signaling response called Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). Recent studies demonstrated that ER stress and UPR signaling are critically involved in the initiation and progression of many diseases, such as metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease, and cancer. In this study, we show that ER stress induced by pharmacologic reagents, including tunicamycin (TM) and thapsigargin (Tg), promotes hepatic lipogenesis and lipid droplet formation. Using quantitative gene expression analysis, we identified 3 groups of key lipogenic regulators or enzymes that are inducible by pharmacological ER stress in a human hepatoma cell line Huh-7. These ER stress-inducible lipogenic factors include: 1) lipogenic trans-activators including CCAAT/ enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), PPARγ coacti-vator 1-alpha (PGC1α), and Liver X receptor alpha (LXRα); 2) components of lipid droplets including fat-specific protein 27 (FSP27), adipose differentiation related protein (ADRP), fat-inducing transcript 2 (FIT2), and adipocyte lipid-binding protein (AP2); 3) key enzymes involved in de novo lipogenesis including acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1). Supporting the role of pharmacologic ER stress in up-regulating de novo lipogenesis, TM or Tg treatment significantly increased accumulation of cytosolic lipid droplet formation in the hepatocytes. Moreover, we showed that forced expression of an activated form of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), a potent UPR trans-activator, can dramatically increase expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα in Huh-7 cells. The identification of ER stress-inducible lipogenic regulators provides important insights into the molecular basis by which acute ER stress promotes de novo lipogenesis. In summary, the findings from this study have important implication in understanding the link between ER stress and metabolic disease.

Download full-text


Available from: Zeng-Quan Yang, Jul 03, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetes mellitus (DM), a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia, is caused by insufficient insulin production due to excessive loss of pancreatic β cells (type I diabetes) or impaired insulin signaling due to peripheral insulin resistance (type II diabetes). Pancreatic β cell is the only insulin-secreting cell type that has highly developed endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to cope with high demands of insulin synthesis and secretion. Therefore, ER homeostasis is crucial to the proper function of insulin signaling. Accumulating evidence suggests that deleterious ER stress and excessive intracellular lipids in nonadipose tissues, such as myocyte, cardiomyocyte, and hepatocyte, cause pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and peripheral insulin resistance, leading to type II diabetes. The excessive deposition of lipid droplets (LDs) in specialized cell types, such as adipocytes, hepatocytes, and macrophages, has been found as a hallmark in ER stress-associated metabolic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, fatty liver disease, and atherosclerosis. However, much work remains to be done in understanding the mechanism by which ER stress response regulates LD formation and the pathophysiologic role of ER stress-associated LD in metabolic disease. This paper briefly summarizes the recent advances in ER stress-associated LD formation and its involvement in type II diabetes.
    02/2012; 2012:247275. DOI:10.1155/2012/247275
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress refers to a condition of accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen, which is known to activate an intracellular stress signaling termed Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). A number of pharmacologic reagents or pathophysiologic stimuli can induce ER stress and activation of the UPR signaling, leading to alteration of cell physiology that is associated with the initiation and progression of a variety of diseases. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), characterized by hepatic steatosis and inflammation, has been considered the precursor or the hepatic manifestation of metabolic disease. In this study, we delineated the toxic effect and molecular basis by which pharmacologic ER stress, induced by a bacterial nucleoside antibiotic tunicamycin (TM), promotes NASH in an animal model. Mice of C57BL/6J strain background were challenged with pharmacologic ER stress by intraperitoneal injection of TM. Upon TM injection, mice exhibited a quick NASH state characterized by hepatic steatosis and inflammation. An increase in hepatic triglycerides (TG) and a decrease in plasma lipids, including plasma TG, plasma cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), were observed in the TM-treated mice. In response to TM challenge, cleavage of sterol responsive binding protein (SREBP)-1a and SREBP-1c, the key trans-activators for lipid and sterol biosynthesis, was dramatically increased in the liver. Consistent with the hepatic steatosis phenotype, expression of some key regulators and enzymes in de novo lipogenesis and lipid droplet formation was up-regulated, while expression of those involved in lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation was down-regulated in the liver of mice challenged with TM. Moreover, TM treatment significantly increased phosphorylation of NF-κB inhibitors (IκB), leading to the activation of NF-κB-mediated inflammatory pathway in the liver. Our study not only confirmed that pharmacologic ER stress is a strong "hit" that triggers NASH, but also demonstrated crucial molecular links between ER stress, lipid metabolism, and inflammation in the liver in vivo.
    Toxicology Letters 03/2012; 211(1):29-38. DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.02.017 · 3.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increased de novo lipogenesis is a hallmark of aggressive cancers. Lipid droplets, the major form of cytosolic lipid storage, have been implicated in cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Recently, we identified the ERLIN2 [ER (endoplasmic reticulum) lipid raft-associated 2) gene that is amplified and overexpressed in aggressive human breast cancer. Previous studies demonstrated that ERLIN2 plays a supporting oncogenic role by facilitating the transformation of human breast cancer cells. In the present study, we found that ERLIN2 supports cancer cell growth by regulating cytosolic lipid droplet production. ERLIN2 is preferably expressed in human breast cancer cells or hepatoma cells and is inducible by insulin signalling or when cells are cultured in lipoprotein-deficient medium. Increased expression of ERLIN2 promotes the accumulation of cytosolic lipid droplets in breast cancer cells or hepatoma cells in response to insulin or overload of unsaturated fatty acids. ERLIN2 regulates activation of SREBP (sterol regulatory element-binding protein) 1c, the key regulator of de novo lipogenesis, in cancer cells. ERLIN2 was found to bind to INSIG1 (insulin-induced gene 1), a key ER membrane protein that blocks SREBP activation. Consistent with the role of ERLIN2 in regulating cytosolic lipid content, down-regulation of ERLIN2 in breast cancer or hepatoma cells led to lower cell proliferation rates. The present study revealed a novel role for ERLIN2 in supporting cancer cell growth by promoting the activation of the key lipogenic regulator SREBP1c and the production of cytosolic lipid droplets. The identification of ERLIN2 as a regulator of cytosolic lipid content in cancer cells has important implications for understanding the molecular basis of tumorigenesis and the treatment of cancer.
    Biochemical Journal 06/2012; 446(3):415-25. DOI:10.1042/BJ20112050 · 4.78 Impact Factor
Show more