Posterior urethral complications of the treatment of prostate cancer

Institute of Urology, London, UK.
BJU International (Impact Factor: 3.13). 02/2012; 110(3):304-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10864.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT • To review the less common and not widely discussed, but much more serious complications of prostate cancer treatment of: urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture and urorectal fistula. • The treatment options for patients with organ-confirmed prostate cancer include: radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy (BT), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) and cryotherapy; with each method or combination of methods having associated complications. • Complications resulting from RP are relatively easy to manage, with rapid recovery and return to normal activities, and usually a return to normal bodily functions. • However, after non-surgical treatments, i.e. BT, EBRT, HIFU and cryotherapy, these same problems are more difficult to treat with a much slower return to a much lower level of function. • When counselling patients about the primary treatment of prostate cancer they should be advised that although the same type of complication may occur after surgical or non-surgical treatment, the scope and scale of that complication, the ease with which it is treated and the degree of restoration of normality after treatment, is altogether in favour of surgery in those for whom surgery is appropriate and who are fit for surgery.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the outcomes of open vesicourethral anastomotic reconstruction (VUAR) for outlet stenosis following radical prostatectomy (RP). Review of all cases of VUAR within an IRB-approved database was performed. Preoperative factors assessed included cancer treatment modality, duration of symptoms, prior treatments, and length of defect. Outcomes reviewed included length-of-stay (LOS), complications, maintenance of patency, continence, and need for additional procedures. Twelve cases of VUAR performed by a single surgeon (BJF) from 2004 to 2012 were identified. Surgical approaches were either abdominal (7), perineal (3), or abdominoperineal (2). All patients underwent prior RP, with 25 % having subsequent radiotherapy. Among patients with stenosis, 43 % were completely obliterated. Two cases had prior anastomotic disruption in the early postoperative period after RP. The median length of stenosis was 2.5 cm (range 1-5 cm) and median LOS was 3.0 days (range 1-7 days). At a median follow-up of 75.5 months (range 14-120 months), 92 % of men retained patency; only 25 % were continent. In experienced hands, VUAR can restore durable patency for men afflicted with outlet stenosis after RP. Despite anatomic restoration, incontinence is likely.
    International Urology and Nephrology 08/2014; 46(11). DOI:10.1007/s11255-014-0816-9 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urethral stricture disease is poorly understood in prostate cancer survivors who have undergone radiation or ablative treatments. We review the cause and incidence of urethral strictures (excluding bladder neck contracture) in this setting, as well as risk factors and treatment options. Stricture rates differ for various modalities of radiation therapy, with the highest rate in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Risk factors include higher dose of radiation delivered to prostate apex, radiation delivered per treatment, and prior transurethral resection of prostate. Cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound of the prostate also carry high risk of urethral stricture formation, particularly in the salvage setting. Dilation or direct vision incision of the urethra can be utilized as a temporizing technique, with frequent recurrence. Urethral stenting is also an option; however, this is associated with a high rate of incontinence. Urethroplasty has durable outcomes for radiation-induced strictures, with a preference for excision and primary anastomosis because of the bulbomembranous location and relatively short length of these strictures. Salvage radical prostatectomy has been described in a small series as treatment for posterior urethral strictures and bladder neck contractures resulting from ablative therapies. Prostate cancer survivors treated with radiation or ablative therapies are at risk for urethral stricture formation. Urethroplasty is a feasible and durable treatment option and should be considered in the appropriate patient.
    Current opinion in urology 05/2014; DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000070 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe our experience with the UroLume Urethral Stent, showing that it provides a viable option for the devastated, obstructed outlet after prostate cancer treatment. We conducted an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of all men at our facility who underwent placement of the UroLume stent from January 2001 to January 2012. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, outcomes, and complications. We specifically evaluated urinary continence, ingrowth of the UroLume stent, need for repeat operations, and complications related to this treatment including artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) erosion. Forty-five men underwent placement of the UroLume stent with an average follow-up of 55.8 months. Of these, 41 had simultaneous or subsequent placement of an AUS with an overall continence rate of 35 of 45 (78%). Ingrowth was seen in 16 of 45 (36%) and AUS erosion in 8 of 41 (19.5%). Of the 16 patients treated for ingrowth, the average number of treatments was 2.7 per patient. There was no association between treatment for ingrowth and rate of AUS erosion (P = .92). Although no longer commercially available, our long-term data indicate that the UroLume was a reasonable minimally invasive treatment option for the devastated, obstructed outlet providing a reasonable rate of need for subsequent interventions. The UroLume maintains patency of the urethral lumen, which usually results in incontinence, but this can be managed with placement of the AUS. The alternative open operative reconstructive options have similar limitations with possibly greater morbidity.
    Urology 08/2013; 82(4). DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.017 · 2.13 Impact Factor