Article

Aripiprazole in combination with lamotrigine for the long-term treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder (manic or mixed): a randomized, multicenter, double-blind study (CN138-392).

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ 0856-1616, USA.
Bipolar Disorders (Impact Factor: 4.62). 02/2012; 14(1):41-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00974.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole (ARI) plus lamotrigine (LTG) compared with placebo (PBO) plus LTG, for long-term treatment in bipolar I disorder patients with a recent manic/mixed episode.
After a 9-24 week stabilization phase receiving single-blind ARI (10-30 mg/day) plus open-label LTG (100 or 200 mg/day), patients maintaining stability (Young Mania Rating Scale/Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total scores ≤ 12) with ARI+LTG for eight consecutive weeks were randomized to continue on double-blind ARI + LTG or to receive PBO + LTG, after removing ARI from ARI + LTG treatment, and followed up for 52 weeks. The primary outcome measure was time from randomization to relapse into a manic/mixed episode.
 A total of 787 patients entered the stabilization phase, and 351 were randomized to ARI + LTG (n = 178) or PBO + LTG (n = 173). ARI + LTG yielded a numerically longer time to manic/mixed relapse than PBO + LTG, but it was not statistically significant [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-1.03; p = 0.058]. The estimated relapse rates at Week 52 were 11% for ARI + LTG and 23% for PBO + LTG, yielding a number needed-to-treat of nine (95% CI: 5-121). The three most common adverse events were akathisia [10.8%, 6.1% for ARI + LTG and PBO + LTG, respectively; number needed-to-harm (NNH) = 22], insomnia (7.4%, 11.5%), and anxiety (7.4%, 3.6%). Mean weight change was 0.43 kg and -1.81 kg, respectively (last observation carried forward, p = 0.001). Rates of ≥ 7% weight gain with ARI + LTG and PBO + LTG were 11.9% and 3.5%, respectively (NNH = 12).
 ARI + LTG delayed the time to manic/mixed relapse but did not reach statistical significance. Safety and tolerability results revealed no unexpected adverse events for ARI combination with LTG.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
219 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. We reviewed the treatment of bipolar mixed states using efficacy data of licensed and non-licensed physical or pharmacological treatments. Methods. We conducted a literature search to identify published studies reporting data on mixed states. Grading was done using an in-house level of evidence and we compared the efficacy with treatment recommendations of mixed states in current bipolar disorder guidelines. Results. A total of 133 studies reported data on mixed states, and seven guidelines differentiate the acute treatment of mixed states from pure states. The strongest evidence in treating co-occurring manic and depressive symptoms was for monotherapy with aripiprazole, asenapine, extended release carbamazepine, valproate, olanzapine, and ziprasidone. Aripiprazole was recommended in three guidelines, asenapine in one, and carbamazepine and ziprasidone in two. As adjunctive treatment, the strongest evidence of efficacy was for olanzapine plus lithium or valproate. For maintenance, there is evidence for the efficacy of monotherapy with valproate, olanzapine, and quetiapine. In the six guidelines valproate or olanzapine are first line monotherapy options; one recommends quetiapine. Recommended add-on treatments are lithium or valproate plus quetiapine. Conclusions. There is a lack of studies designed to address the efficacy of medications in mixed affective symptoms. Guidelines do not fully reflect the current evidences.
    The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 05/2014; 15(5):1-14. DOI:10.3109/15622975.2014.908238 · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have emerged as new treatment options for bipolar disorders (BDs). Aripiprazole (ARI) is already an SGA approved therapy for the treatment of BD type-I, both as a monotherapy as well as an add-on therapy in acute mania and in long-term maintenance therapy. Areas covered: The authors provide a systematic review that illustrates ARI's pharmacological profile including its efficacy on various aspects of BD in adults. It also reviews its role in bipolar treatment algorithms and provides a focus on future research developments and further potential uses of the compound. Additional aspects such as safety and tolerability are also considered. Expert opinion: Compared with haloperidol, ARI shows fewer extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), but has a slightly lower efficacy in mania. It has a better metabolic parameter profile and fewer cardiovascular adverse events than other SGAs although the add-on treatment shows a higher risk of EPS. Presently, data doesn't support its use as a first choice maintenance monotherapy but it may be useful as a combination therapy for BD patients with comorbidities such as drug abuse and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Studies on ARI in bipolar depression are disappointing. However, future studies on the drug, at a low dose combined with a stabilizer or antidepressant may prove interesting.
    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 10/2014; 23(12):1-18. DOI:10.1517/13543784.2014.971152 · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Japanese Society of Mood Disorders established a committee for treatment guidelines of mood disorders, which created the first edition of a treatment guideline for bipolar disorders on 10 March 2011. The committee has now created a second edition, which we report here. In creating this treatment guideline, the first step was to have several bipolar disorder specialists review well-conducted studies and meta-analyses. Based on this evidence, and with a consensus among the specialists, treatment procedures that were considered optimal were compiled and the strength of recommendation for each treatment method was determined. The first draft, prepared in this manner, was further revised through a process of critical investigation by all committee members to produce the final edition.
    Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 06/2013; 67(5). DOI:10.1111/pcn.12060 · 2.04 Impact Factor