Article

Using the Opportunity Estimator tool to improve engagement in a quality and safety intervention.

Division of Helath Sciences Infomatics, Johns Hopskin University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 01/2012; 38(1):41-7, 1.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Teams throughout the United States participating in a program to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are using the Opportunity Estimator. This web-based tool translates CLABSI-related data into "opportunity estimates" of the patient lives and money that could be saved by reducing these infections.

3 Followers
 · 
266 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the extent to which intensive care units participating in the initial Keystone ICU project sustained reductions in rates of catheter related bloodstream infections. Design Collaborative cohort study to implement and evaluate interventions to improve patients' safety. Intensive care units predominantly in Michigan, USA. Conceptual model aimed at improving clinicians' use of five evidence based recommendations to reduce rates of catheter related bloodstream infections rates, with measurement and feedback of infection rates. During the sustainability period, intensive care unit teams were instructed to integrate this intervention into staff orientation, collect monthly data from hospital infection control staff, and report infection rates to appropriate stakeholders. Quarterly rate of catheter related bloodstream infections per 1000 catheter days during the sustainability period (19-36 months after implementation of the intervention). Ninety (87%) of the original 103 intensive care units participated, reporting 1532 intensive care unit months of data and 300 310 catheter days during the sustainability period. The mean and median rates of catheter related bloodstream infection decreased from 7.7 and 2.7 (interquartile range 0.6-4.8) at baseline to 1.3 and 0 (0-2.4) at 16-18 months and to 1.1 and 0 (0.0-1.2) at 34-36 months post-implementation. Multilevel regression analysis showed that incidence rate ratios decreased from 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.88) at 0-3 months to 0.38 (0.26 to 0.56) at 16-18 months and 0.34 (0.24-0.48) at 34-36 months post-implementation. During the sustainability period, the mean bloodstream infection rate did not significantly change from the initial 18 month post-implementation period (-1%, 95% confidence interval -9% to 7%). The reduced rates of catheter related bloodstream infection achieved in the initial 18 month post-implementation period were sustained for an additional 18 months as participating intensive care units integrated the intervention into practice. Broad use of this intervention with achievement of similar results could substantially reduce the morbidity and costs associated with catheter related bloodstream infections.
    BMJ (online) 02/2010; 340:c309. DOI:10.1136/bmj.c309 · 16.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intensive care unit-acquired (ICU-acquired) bloodstream infections (BSI) are an important complication of critical illness. The objective of this study was to quantify the excess length of stay, mortality and cost attributable to ICU-acquired BSI. A matched cohort study was conducted in all adult ICUs in the Calgary Health Region between 1 May 2000 and 30 April 2003. One hundred and forty-four patients with ICU-acquired BSI were matched (1:1) to patients without ICU-acquired BSI. Patients with ICU-acquired BSI had a significantly increased median length of ICU stay {15.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 8-26] days vs 12 [IQR 7-18.5] days, P=0.003} and median costs of hospital care [85,137 dollars (IQR 45,740-131,412 dollars) vs 67,879 dollars (IQR 35,043-115,915 dollars, P=0.02) compared with patients without ICU-acquired BSI. The median excess length of ICU stay was two days and the median cost attributable to ICU-acquired BSI was 12,321 dollars per case. Sixty (42%) of the cases died compared with 37 (26%) of the controls [P=0.002, attributable mortality 16%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-26.0%]. Patients with ICU-acquired BSI were at increased risk for in-hospital death (odds ratio=2.64, 95%CI 1.40-5.29). Among survivor-matched pairs, the median excess lengths of ICU and hospital stay attributable to development of ICU-acquired BSI were two and 13.5 days, respectively, and the attributable cost due to ICU-acquired BSI was 25,155 dollars per case survivor. Critically ill patients who develop ICU-acquired BSI suffer excess morbidity and mortality, and incur significantly increased healthcare costs. These data support expenditures on infection prevention and control programmes and further research into reducing the impact of these infections.
    Journal of Hospital Infection 07/2006; 63(2):124-32. DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.016 · 2.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The IOM identified patient safety as a significant problem. This paper describes the implementation and validation of a comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) in intensive care settings. Methods: An 8-step safety program was implemented in the Weinberg ICU, with a second control (SICU) subsequently receiving the intervention. Unit improvement teams (physician, nurse, administrator) were identified to champion efforts between staff and Safety Committee. CUSP steps: (1) culture of safety assessment; (2) sciences of safety education; (3) staff identification of safety concerns; (4) senior executives adopt a unit; (5) improvements implemented from safety concerns; (6) efforts documented/analyzed; (7) results shared; and (8) culture reassessment. Results: Safety culture improved post versus pre-intervention (35% to 52% in WICU and 35% to 67% in SICU). Senior executive adoption led to patient transport teams and pharmacy presence in ICUs. Interventions from safety assessment included: medication reconciliation, short-term goals sheet and relabeling epidural catheters. One-year post-CUSP implementation, length of stay (LOS) decreased from 2 to 1 day in WICU and 3 to 2 days in SICU (P < 0.05 WICU and SICU). Medication errors in transfer orders were nearly eliminated, and nursing turnover decreased from 9% to 2% in WICU and 8% to 2% in SICU (neither statistically significant). Conclusions: CUSP successfully implemented in 2 ICUs. CUSP can improve patient safety and reduce medication errors, LOS, and potentially nursing turnover.
    Journal of Patient Safety 02/2005; 1(1):33-40. DOI:10.1097/01209203-200503000-00008 · 0.88 Impact Factor