Pathophysiological Role of Hormones and Cytokines in Cancer Cachexia

Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Journal of Korean medical science (Impact Factor: 1.25). 02/2012; 27(2):128-34. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.2.128
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigated the role of fasting hormones and pro-inflammatory cytokines in cancer patients. Hormones (ghrelin, adiponectin, and leptin) and cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6) were measured by ELISA or RIA in lung cancer and colorectal cancer patients before the administration of cancer therapy, and measurements were repeated every 2 months for 6 months. From June 2006 to August 2008, 42 patients (19 with colorectal cancer and 23 with lung cancer) were enrolled. In total, 21 patients were included in the cachexia group and the others served as a comparison group. No significant difference in the initial adiponectin, ghrelin, TNF-α, IFN-γ, or IL-6 level was observed between groups, although leptin was significantly lower in cachectic patients than in the comparison group (15.3 ± 19.5 vs 80.9 ± 99.0 pg/mL, P = 0.007). During the follow-up, the patients who showed a > 5% weight gain had higher ghrelin levels after 6 months. Patients exhibiting elevated IL-6 levels typically showed a weight loss > 5% after 6 months. A blunted adiponectin or ghrelin response to weight loss may contribute to cancer cachexia and IL-6 may be responsible for inducing and maintaining cancer cachexia.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer cachexia is a metabolic syndrome featuring many alterations typical of type 2 diabetes (T2D). While muscle wasting is a hallmark of cachexia, epidemiological evidence also supports an accelerated age-related muscle loss in T2D. Insulin resistance manifests in both conditions and impairs glucose disposal and protein anabolism by tissues. A greater contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose production may limit amino acid availability for muscle protein synthesis, further aggravating muscle loss. In the context of inter-dependence between glucose and protein metabolism, the present review summarizes the current state of knowledge on alterations that may lead to muscle wasting in human cancer. By highlighting the similarities with T2D, a disease that has been more extensively studied, the objective of this review is to provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of cancer cachexia and to consider potential treatments usually targeted for T2D. Nutritional approaches aimed at stimulating protein anabolism might include specially formulated food with optimal protein and amino acid composition. Because the gradual muscle loss in T2D may be attenuated by diabetes treatment, anti-diabetic drugs might be considered in cachexia treatment. Metformin emerges as a choice candidate as it acts both on reducing gluconeogenesis and improving insulin sensitivity, and has demonstrated tumour suppressor properties in multiple cancer types. Such a multimodal approach to slow or reverse muscle wasting in cachexia warrants further investigation.
    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 06/2014; 39(6). DOI:10.1139/apnm-2013-0369 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the effect of 24 h exposure to 100 nmol/l glibenclamide on insulin secretion in isolated rat pancreatic islets. The insulin content was similar in control islets and in islets preincubated with 100 nmol/l glibenclamide for 24 h. In islets preexposed to glibenclamide: 1) the subsequent response to a maximal glibenclamide stimulatory concentration (10 mumol/l, 1 h at 37 C) was greatly reduced in comparison to control islets (0.69 +/- 0.20% vs 2.16 +/- 0.41%; mean +/- SE; n = 14; p less than 0.001); 2) the response to 100 mumol/l tolbutamide stimulation was also reduced (0.55 +/- 0.15% vs 2.38 +/- 0.44%; n = 8; p less than 0.001); 3) the response to 16.7 mmo/l glucose, both in the presence or in the absence of 1 mmol/l IBMX, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, was also diminished by about 50% (1.79 +/- 0.39% vs. 3.22 +/- 0.42%; n = 14, p less than 0.001). In glibenclamide pretreated islets, blunted responses to stimuli were confirmed also by dynamic studies using a perifusion system. The effect of glibenclamide preincubation was fully reversible: when islets cultured in the presence of glibenclamide were transferred to a glibenclamide-free medium for further 24 h, insulin release in response to glibenclamide stimulation returned to control values. We conclude that prolonged exposure of rat pancreatic islets to glibenclamide induces a reversible desensitization to a variety of metabolic stimuli. The inhibition by prolonged glibenclamide exposure of a common pathway in the mechanism of insulin release is one possible explanation for these results.
    Journal of endocrinological investigation 05/1991; 14(4):287-91. DOI:10.1007/BF03346813 · 1.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cachexia is a condition typified by wasting of fat and LBM caused by anorexia and further endocrinological modulation of energy stores. Diseases known to cause cachectic symptoms include cancer, chronic kidney disease, and chronic heart failure; these conditions are associated with increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and increased resting energy expenditure. Early studies have suggested the central melanocortin system as one of the main mediators of the symptoms of cachexia. Pharmacological and genetic antagonism of these pathways attenuates cachectic symptoms in laboratory models; effects have yet to be studied in humans. In addition, ghrelin, an endogenous orexigenic hormone with receptors on melanocortinergic neurons, has been shown to ameliorate symptoms of cachexia, at least in part, by an increase in appetite via melanocortin modulation, in addition to its anticatabolic and anti-inflammatory effects. These effects of ghrelin have been confirmed in multiple types of cachexia in both laboratory and human studies, suggesting a positive future for cachexia treatments.
    Vitamins & Hormones 01/2013; 92:197-242. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-410473-0.00008-8 · 1.78 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Available from