Article

Macromolecular assembly structures by comparative modeling and electron microscopy.

Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) (Impact Factor: 1.29). 01/2012; 857:331-50. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_15
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Advances in electron microscopy allow for structure determination of large biological machines at increasingly higher resolutions. A key step in this process is fitting component structures into the electron microscopy-derived density map of their assembly. Comparative modeling can contribute by providing atomic models of the components, via fold assignment, sequence-structure alignment, model building, and model assessment. All four stages of comparative modeling can also benefit from consideration of the density map. In this chapter, we describe numerous types of modeling problems restrained by a density map and available protocols for finding solutions. In particular, we provide detailed instructions for density map-guided modeling using the Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP), MODELLER, and UCSF Chimera.

0 Followers
 · 
122 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computational modeling of three-dimensional macromolecular structures and complexes from their sequence has been a long-standing vision in structural biology. Over the last 2 decades, a paradigm shift has occurred: starting from a large "structure knowledge gap" between the huge number of protein sequences and small number of known structures, today, some form of structural information, either experimental or template-based models, is available for the majority of amino acids encoded by common model organism genomes. With the scientific focus of interest moving toward larger macromolecular complexes and dynamic networks of interactions, the integration of computational modeling methods with low-resolution experimental techniques allows the study of large and complex molecular machines. One of the open challenges for computational modeling and prediction techniques is to convey the underlying assumptions, as well as the expected accuracy and structural variability of a specific model, which is crucial to understanding its limitations.
    Structure 09/2013; 21(9):1531-40. DOI:10.1016/j.str.2013.08.007 · 6.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The structure of protein-protein complexes can be constructed by using the known structure of other protein complexes as a template. The complex structure templates are generally detected either by homology-based sequence alignments or, given the structure of monomer components, by structure-based comparisons. Critical improvements have been made in recent years by utilizing interface recognition and by recombining monomer and complex template libraries. Encouraging progress has also been witnessed in genome-wide applications of template-based modeling, with modeling accuracy comparable to high-throughput experimental data. Nevertheless, bottlenecks exist due to the incompleteness of the protein-protein complex structure library and the lack of methods for distant homologous template identification and full-length complex structure refinement.
    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 02/2014; 24C:10-23. DOI:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.005 · 8.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interactions between proteins are orchestrated in a precise and time-dependent manner, underlying cellular function. The binding affinity, defined as the strength of these interactions, is translated into physico-chemical terms in the dissociation constant (K(d)), the latter being an experimental measure that determines whether an interaction will be formed in solution or not. Predicting binding affinity from structural models has been a matter of active research for more than 40 years because of its fundamental role in drug development. However, all available approaches are incapable of predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes from coordinates alone. Here, we examine both theoretical and experimental limitations that complicate the derivation of structure-affinity relationships. Most work so far has concentrated on binary interactions. Systems of increased complexity are far from being understood. The main physico-chemical measure that relates to binding affinity is the buried surface area, but it does not hold for flexible complexes. For the latter, there must be a significant entropic contribution that will have to be approximated in the future. We foresee that any theoretical modelling of these interactions will have to follow an integrative approach considering the biology, chemistry and physics that underlie protein-protein recognition.
    Journal of The Royal Society Interface 02/2013; 10(79):20120835. DOI:10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 · 3.86 Impact Factor