Article

Effects of different substrates on the sprint performance of lizards.

CONICET - Instituto de Herpetología - Fundación Miguel Lillo, Miguel Lillo 251 (4000), San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
Journal of Experimental Biology (impact factor: 3). 03/2012; 215(Pt 5):774-84. DOI:10.1242/jeb.065490 pp.774-84
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The variation in substrate structure is one of the most important determinants of the locomotor abilities of lizards. Lizards are found across a range of habitats, from large rocks to loose sand, each of them with conflicting mechanical demands on locomotion. We examined the relationships among sprint speed, morphology and different types of substrate surfaces in species of lizards that exploit different structural habitats (arboreal, saxicolous, terrestrial and arenicolous) in a phylogenetic context. Our main goals were to assess which processes drive variability in morphology (i.e. phylogeny or adaptation to habitat) in order to understand how substrate structure affects sprint speed in species occupying different habitats and to determine the relationship between morphology and performance. Liolaemini lizards show that most morphological traits are constrained by phylogeny, particularly toe 3, the femur and foot. All ecological groups showed significant differences on rocky surfaces. Surprisingly, no ecological group performed better on the surface resembling its own habitat. Moreover, all groups exhibited significant differences in sprint speed among the three different types of experimental substrates and showed the best performance on sand, with the exception of the arboreal group. Despite the fact that species use different types of habitats, the highly conservative morphology of Liolaemini species and the similar levels of performance on different types of substrates suggest that they confer to the 'jack of all trades and master of none' principle.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views

Keywords

conflicting mechanical demands
 
conservative morphology
 
experimental substrates
 
exploit different structural habitats
 
groups exhibited significant differences
 
large rocks
 
Liolaemini lizards
 
Liolaemini species
 
lizards
 
loose sand
 
main goals
 
morphological traits
 
none' principle
 
own habitat
 
phylogenetic context
 
processes drive variability
 
relationships
 
species use different types
 
three different types
 
toe 3