Article

Learning curves for single-site laparoscopic ovarian surgery.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (Impact Factor: 1.61). 02/2012; 19(3):344-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare learning curves for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ovarian tumors according to the type of procedure (oophorectomy vs cystectomy).
A prospective cohort study. (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).
University hospital.
One hundred fifteen patients who planned to undergo LESS for ovarian tumors by a surgeon between May 2008 and August 2010.
LESS.
The learning curve was assessed through the graph between the operative time and sequence of cases. Proficiency, defined as the point at which the slope of the learning curve became less steep, and surgical outcome were compared between the two surgery groups. LESS was successfully completed in 103 of 115 patients (94.8%). Learning curve for oophorectomies (n = 59) showed a continued slow slope with no apparent proficiency, suggesting oophorectomies did not pose an initial technical challenge. However, proficiency in cystectomies (n = 56) was evident at the thirty-third case. Furthermore, the oophorectomy group had a shorter operative time and less need for additional ports than the cystectomy group (69.4 minutes vs 100.1 minutes; 5.1% vs 14.3%).
Oophorectomy rather than cystectomy is recommended as the initial procedure to start with LESS for ovarian tumors.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
88 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the adnexectomy by laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with conventional laparoscopic instruments, we standardised the technique of salpingo-oophorectomy.
    Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité 08/2014; · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate laparo-endoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M) for the surgical treatment of fibroids and to compare surgical outcomes and postoperative pain to conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (CLM). Design Retrospective study. Setting University-based hospital. Patients Data was obtained from medical records of patients who underwent LESS-M between August 2011 and June 2012. Considering the surgeon’s learning curve for LESS-M, we collected the data after 100 LESS-M procedures were performed. The cases were compared with a historic cohort of patients who underwent CLM performed by the same surgeon between July 2008 and May 2009. A single experienced surgeon performed both procedures in all patients. A total of 118 patients who underwent LESS-M or CLM were included in the study (59 in the LESS-M group and 59 in the CLM group). Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results We analyzed and compared patient basal characteristics and surgical outcomes between the 2 groups. There were no statistically significant differences in basal characteristics (age, body mass index, number and size of myomas, and type of the largest myoma) between the 2 groups. And the surgical outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin drop, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain scores) were not different statistically between 2 groups. Moreover, patients did not experienced major intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were wound infections that occurred in 3 patients (2 in the LESS-M and 1 in the CLM groups). Conclusion LESS-M is feasible for less than 5 myomas and offers comparable surgical outcomes to those of CLM after the surgeon’s initial learning curve.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 01/2014; · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether fewer port numbers in laparoscopic adnexal surgery would lead to better cosmesis. Prospective comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). University hospital. One hundred thirty consecutive patients with adnexal tumors. The patients were managed by single-port (n=75), two-port (n=22), and four-port laparoscopy (n=33). Cosmetic satisfaction was assessed using a validated Body Image Questionnaire at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-surgery. The patients' characteristics by age, parity, socio-demographics, detail of the procedures performed, and histologic finding were well balanced between the three surgery groups. There was also no difference in surgical results such as conversion to other surgical approaches, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain and perioperative complications. The single-port group reported significantly higher cosmetic satisfaction at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-surgery compared to the two-port or four-port groups. However, there was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome throughout the follow-up between the two-port and four-port group. Single-port laparoscopy had a definite benefit in cosmetic satisfaction, unlike the two-port or four-port laparoscopy.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 07/2013; · 1.61 Impact Factor