Article

Women derive less benefit from elective endovascular aneurysm repair than men

The Vascular Group, The Institute for Vascular Health and Disease, Albany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Avenue, MC 157, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter (Impact Factor: 2.98). 02/2012; 55(4):906-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.047
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Women have a lower chance of surviving elective open abdominal aortic repair. The reasons for this are not clear. Endovascular repair has clearly reduced early and midterm morbidity and mortality for patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, most patients are male. It is unclear whether there has been any reduction in elective morbidity for females or what the extent of that reduction has been. We prospectively analyzed outcomes for elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in women at our center and compared results with those for elective open surgery and emergent open and endovascular repair.
All patients undergoing elective and emergency AAA from 2002 to 2009 were prospectively entered into a database. Demographic details, including gender, were tabulated. Outcome measures were operative blood loss, incidence of type 1 endoleaks, length of in-hospital stay, postoperative complications, 30-day all-cause mortality, and secondary interventions during the follow-up period. Statistical analysis was performed using Fischer exact test and Student t test. A multivariate analysis was also performed.
From 2002 to 2009, there were 2631 abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) open and endovascular repairs performed in our center (1698 endovascular aneurysm repairs [EVARs], 933 "open"). Males comprised 1995 (76%) of patients; females 636 (24%). There were 1592 elective EVARs (1248 male, 344 female) and 106 emergency EVARs (73 male, 33 female). Elective open repair was performed in 788 patients (579 male, 209 female) and emergency open repair in 149 (73 male, 76 female). For women, elective EVAR resulted in significantly greater mortality rates than men (3.2% vs 0.96%, P < .005). There was a greater incidence of intraoperative aortic neck or iliac artery rupture (4.1% vs 1.2% P = .002) and use of Palmaz stents for type 1 endoleaks (16.1% vs 8%, P = .0009). Mean blood loss was greater in females (327 mL vs 275 mL, P = .038). Perioperative complications were also more frequent in women: leg ischemia (3.5% vs 0.6%, P = .003) and colon ischemia requiring colectomy (0.9% vs 0.2%, P = .009). Mean hospital stay was also longer (3.7 days vs 2.2 days, P = .0001). In contrast, there were no gender differences for any of these outcome measures for elective open repair or emergency open surgery or EVAR. There was no significant difference in death rates between EVAR and open repair in women (3.2% vs 5.7%). In males, the 30-day mortality was 0.96% for elective EVAR and 4.7% for elective open surgery. Following logistic regression, female gender remains a significant risk even when the effects of aneurysm size and age are considered (odds ratio 3.4, P < .01).
Mortality for females undergoing elective EVAR is significantly greater than for males. It is also more hazardous. Colon ischemia, native arterial rupture, and type 1 endoleaks are more frequent. Elective endovascular aneurysm repair benefits men more than women.

0 Followers
 · 
91 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose : To compare the midterm results in patients treated with the Endurant stent-graft according to device-specific instructions for use (IFU) vs. those treated in an off-label (OL) situation. Methods : Between November 2007 and March 2010, 177 patients (161 men; mean age 73.7 years) with abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated with the Endurant stent-graft at 2 European centers. Patients operated on according to the IFU (121, 68.4%) were compared with those who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair in OL circumstances (56, 31.6%) to evaluate estimated 5-year survival, freedom from any device-related reinterventions, freedom from graft thrombosis, and freedom from type I endoleak. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of poor outcomes in the OL group. Results : Mean follow-up was 31.2 months (range 1-65). At 5 years, there were no differences in terms of survival (67.9% IFU vs. 54.1% OL, p=0.3), freedom from any device-related reintervention (91.2% IFU vs. 92.4% OL, p=0.8), or freedom from graft thrombosis (97.5% IFU vs. 92.7% OL, p=0.3). Estimated 5-year freedom from type I endoleak was significantly better in the IFU group than in OL (100% vs. 96.2%, respectively; p=0.03). In the OL group, multivariate analysis showed that female sex and coronary artery disease were independent predictors of poor survival. Conclusion : Off-label use of the Endurant stent-graft was associated with a greater but acceptable risk of type I endoleak. Otherwise, there was no difference between the IFU and off-label groups as regards survival, graft thrombosis, or reintervention.
    Journal of Endovascular Therapy 12/2014; 21(6):841-7. DOI:10.1583/14-4795MR.1 · 3.59 Impact Factor
  • European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 12/2014; 48(6):614-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.016 · 3.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose : To investigate the observed inflow stenosis at the O-rings of the Ovation stent-graft and evaluate its hemodynamic and clinical impact. Methods : The study involved 49 consecutive patients (48 men; mean age 71.2±7.7 years) treated successfully with the Ovation abdominal aortic stent-graft between June 2011 and January 2014 at a single center. Cross-sectional area and radius measurements of the infrarenal aorta just proximal to the sealing mechanism, as well at the site of stenosis, were measured from 3D reconstructions of the 1-month postoperative computed tomographic angiograms. Based on Poiseuille's law, the predicted pressure drop was calculated for each patient based on the length of the stenosis. Invasive blood pressure measurements at 3 levels (proximal to the inflatable rings, halfway inside the stenosis, and distal to the stenosis) were obtained in 10 patients intraoperatively. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) values preoperatively were compared to those after the procedure for all patients to assess the clinical impact of this phenomenon. Results : Median internal cross-sectional area at the site of the stenosis was significantly reduced compared to the area just proximal to the O-rings [57% reduction: 123 mm(2) (range 28-254) vs. 283 mm(2) (range 177-531), respectively; p<0.001]. The same was observed for the radius [6.5 mm (range 3-9) vs. 9.5 mm (range 7.5-13), respectively; p<0.001]. Based on the median 15 mm length of the stenosis (range 13-17) observed in the study population, a median pressure drop of 0.13 mmHg (range 0-0.25) along the stenosis was calculated. Invasive blood pressure measurements indicated a non-significant pressure change along the stenosis (e.g., 0.7 mmHg between the proximal level and halfway inside the stenosis). ABI remained practically unchanged postoperatively. Conclusion : The advantages of the Ovation device's unique sealing mechanism come at the expense of a median area inflow stenosis of ∼60%. This stenosis does not cause a hemodynamically significant pressure drop. Future modification of the graft ring design may be needed in order to reduce this stenosis.
    Journal of Endovascular Therapy 12/2014; 21(6):829-38. DOI:10.1583/14-4771MR.1 · 3.59 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
32 Downloads
Available from
May 17, 2014