Women derive less benefit from elective endovascular aneurysm repair than men

The Vascular Group, The Institute for Vascular Health and Disease, Albany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Avenue, MC 157, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter (Impact Factor: 3.02). 02/2012; 55(4):906-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.047
Source: PubMed


Women have a lower chance of surviving elective open abdominal aortic repair. The reasons for this are not clear. Endovascular repair has clearly reduced early and midterm morbidity and mortality for patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, most patients are male. It is unclear whether there has been any reduction in elective morbidity for females or what the extent of that reduction has been. We prospectively analyzed outcomes for elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in women at our center and compared results with those for elective open surgery and emergent open and endovascular repair.
All patients undergoing elective and emergency AAA from 2002 to 2009 were prospectively entered into a database. Demographic details, including gender, were tabulated. Outcome measures were operative blood loss, incidence of type 1 endoleaks, length of in-hospital stay, postoperative complications, 30-day all-cause mortality, and secondary interventions during the follow-up period. Statistical analysis was performed using Fischer exact test and Student t test. A multivariate analysis was also performed.
From 2002 to 2009, there were 2631 abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) open and endovascular repairs performed in our center (1698 endovascular aneurysm repairs [EVARs], 933 "open"). Males comprised 1995 (76%) of patients; females 636 (24%). There were 1592 elective EVARs (1248 male, 344 female) and 106 emergency EVARs (73 male, 33 female). Elective open repair was performed in 788 patients (579 male, 209 female) and emergency open repair in 149 (73 male, 76 female). For women, elective EVAR resulted in significantly greater mortality rates than men (3.2% vs 0.96%, P < .005). There was a greater incidence of intraoperative aortic neck or iliac artery rupture (4.1% vs 1.2% P = .002) and use of Palmaz stents for type 1 endoleaks (16.1% vs 8%, P = .0009). Mean blood loss was greater in females (327 mL vs 275 mL, P = .038). Perioperative complications were also more frequent in women: leg ischemia (3.5% vs 0.6%, P = .003) and colon ischemia requiring colectomy (0.9% vs 0.2%, P = .009). Mean hospital stay was also longer (3.7 days vs 2.2 days, P = .0001). In contrast, there were no gender differences for any of these outcome measures for elective open repair or emergency open surgery or EVAR. There was no significant difference in death rates between EVAR and open repair in women (3.2% vs 5.7%). In males, the 30-day mortality was 0.96% for elective EVAR and 4.7% for elective open surgery. Following logistic regression, female gender remains a significant risk even when the effects of aneurysm size and age are considered (odds ratio 3.4, P < .01).
Mortality for females undergoing elective EVAR is significantly greater than for males. It is also more hazardous. Colon ischemia, native arterial rupture, and type 1 endoleaks are more frequent. Elective endovascular aneurysm repair benefits men more than women.

Download full-text


Available from: John Byrne, Jan 03, 2014
36 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Difficult iliac artery access remains one of the limiting factors in the successful application of endovascular management of abdominal and thoracic aortic pathologies. An understanding of the scope of the problem, as well as the recognition of patient characteristics that increase the likelihood of difficult access are paramount in preoperative planning. Herein we discuss the specific challenges of aorto-iliac access as well as provide a treatment algorithm for avoiding aorto-iliac complications. Alternative access strategies and emergency bail-out procedures are discussed. A thorough understanding of the preoperative anatomy and imaging is key to successful endovascular aortic surgery.
    Seminars in Vascular Surgery 09/2012; 25(3):138-43. DOI:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2012.08.003 · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fewer women than men suffer from abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The women who are diagnosed with this fatal disease are more generally diseased, have a higher risk of concurrent thoracic aortic aneurysms, have a lower chance of endovascular aortic repair treatment, have a higher complication rate, and presumably, have a poorer survival rate than men with AAAs and other women in the population. This is an overview on prevalence, treatment, outcome, and multilevel aneurysm disease in women with AAAs compared with men.
    The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 12/2012; 61(1). DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1329697 · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) decreases 30-day mortality for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (r-AAAs) compared with open surgical repair (OSR). However, which patients benefit or whether there is any long-term survival advantage is uncertain. Methods: From 2002 to 2011, 283 patients with r-AAA underwent EVAR (n = 120 [42.4%]) or OSR (n = 163 [57.6%]) at Albany Medical Center. All data were collected prospectively. Patients were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, and outcomes were evaluated by a logistic regression multivariable model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term survival. Results: The EVAR patients had a significantly lower 30-day mortality than did the OSR patients (29/120 [24.2%] vs 72/163 [44.2%]; P < .005) and better cumulative 5-year survival (37% vs 26%; P < .005). Men benefited more from EVAR (mortality: 20.9% for EVAR vs 44.3% for OSR; P < .001) than did women (mortality: 32.4% vs 43.9%; P = .39). Age ≥80 years was a significant predictor of death for EVAR (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; P = .003) but not for OSR (OR, 1.04; P = .056). Preexisting hypertension was a significant predictor of survival for both EVAR (OR, 0.17; P < .001) and OSR (OR, 0.48; P = .021). Almost one fourth of EVAR patients (21/91 [23.1%]) required secondary interventions. Survival advantage was maintained for EVAR patients to 5 years. Conclusions: For r-AAA, EVAR reduces the 30-day mortality and improves long-term survival up to 5 years. However, whereas open survivors require few graft-related interventions, up to 23% of EVAR patients will require reintervention for endoleaks or graft migration. Close follow-up of all EVAR survivors is mandatory.
    Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter 12/2012; 57(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.003 · 3.02 Impact Factor
Show more