Influence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Procedure Selection and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Isolated Mitral Valve Surgery

Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9638, USA.
Journal of Cardiac Surgery (Impact Factor: 0.89). 01/2012; 27(1):29-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01393.x
Source: PubMed


Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE as a risk factor for adverse outcomes during mitral surgery has not been studied. The purpose of this investigation was to compare procedure selection and outcomes of patients with and without SLE.
The 2005-2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was searched to identify patients ≥18 years of age undergoing isolated mitral repair or replacement. Patients with and without SLE were compared on baseline characteristics and hospital outcomes. Within patients with SLE, those undergoing repair and replacement were compared.
SLE patients comprised 0.9% (620/70,969) of the isolated mitral valve surgery population. Patients with SLE were significantly younger, more likely to be female, less likely to be white, had higher Charlson comorbidity index, and less often presented electively. Patients with SLE had a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (LOS > 10 days; 44.4% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.0392). Mortality was similar for patients with and without SLE undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.28-2.05, p = 0.5821). Patients with SLE were less likely to have mitral valve repair (27.1% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.0002). Baseline characteristics were similar between SLE repair and replacement subsets. Median LOS was higher for replacement (10 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0014). Hospital mortality was 0% for SLE mitral repair patients and <4.0% for SLE replacement patients.
Patients with SLE present for isolated mitral valve surgery at a much younger age and with worse preoperative profiles. Although mitral repair rates were lower in patients with SLE, hospital outcomes were excellent, and comparable to those of patients without SLE.

Download full-text


Available from: Christina M Vassileva, Jun 08, 2015
  • Source
    • "Echocardiography remains the best imaging modality for early and accurate diagnosis and helps to avoid misdiagnosis (papillary fibroelastoma and infective endocarditis). The definitive diagnosis can be achieved by histopathologic examination of the valve [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. It consists of fibrin deposits, fibroblastic organization, neovascularisation, immune complexes, and infiltration of mononuclear cells [1] [10]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Valvular heart disease is the common cardiacmanifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with a tendency formitral valve regurgitation. In this study we report a case of mitral valve replacement for mitral stenosis caused by Libman-Sacks endocarditis in the setting of SLE. In addition, we provide a systematic review of the literature on mitral valve surgery in the presence of Libman-Sacks endocarditis because its challenge on surgical options continues. Surgical decision depends on structural involvement of mitral valve andpresence of active lupus nephritis and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Reviewof the literature has also shown that outcome is good in most SLE patients who have undergone valvular surgery, but association of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome with SLE has negative impact on the outcome.
    The Scientific World Journal 01/2014; 2014:1-9. · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the validity of billing, procedural, or diagnosis code, or pharmacy claim-based algorithms used to identify patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in administrative and claims databases. We searched the MEDLINE database from 1991 to September 2012 using controlled vocabulary and key terms related to SLE. We also searched the reference lists of included studies. Two investigators independently assessed the full text of studies against pre-determined inclusion criteria. The two reviewers independently extracted data regarding participant and algorithm characteristics and assessed a study's methodologic rigor using a pre-defined approach. Twelve studies included validation statistics for the identification of SLE in administrative and claims databases. Seven of these studies used the ICD-9 code of 710.0 in selected populations of patients seen by a rheumatologist or patients who had experienced the complication of SLE-associated nephritis, other kidney disease, or pregnancy. The other studies looked at limited data in general populations. The algorithm in the selected populations had a positive predictive value (PPV) in the range of 70-90% and of the limited data in general populations it was in the range of 50-60%. Few studies use rigorous methods to validate an algorithm for the identification of SLE in general populations. Algorithms including ICD-9 code of 710.0 in physician billing and hospitalization records have a PPV of approximately 60%. A requirement that the code is obtained from a record based on treatment by a rheumatologist increases the PPV of the algorithm but limits the generalizability in the general population.
    Vaccine 12/2013; 31S10:K62-K73. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.104 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The volume-outcome relationship has been suggested as a quality metric in mitral valve surgery and would be particularly relevant in the elderly because of their greater burden of comorbidities and higher perioperative risk. The study included 1239 hospitals performing mitral valve surgery on Medicare beneficiaries from 2000 through 2009. Only 9% of hospitals performed more than 40 mitral operations per year, 29% performed 5 or less, and 51% performed 10 or less. Mitral repair rates were low; 22.7% of hospitals performed 1 or less, 65.1% performed 5 or less, and only 5.6% performed more than 20 mitral repairs per year in those aged 65 years or more. Repair rates increased with increasing volume of mitral operations per year: 5 or less, 30.5%; 6 to 10, 32.9%; 11 to 20, 34.9%; 21 to 40, 38.8%; and more than 40, 42.0% (P = .0001). Hospitals with lower volume had significantly higher adjusted operative mortality compared with hospitals performing more than 40 cases per year: 5 or less cases per year, odds ratio (OR) 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-1.78); 6 to 10 cases per year, OR 1.29 (95% CI, 1.17-1.43); 11 to 20 cases per year, OR 1.17 (95% CI, 1.07-1.28); 21 to 40 cases per year, OR 1.15 (95% CI, 1.05-1.26). Hospitals with lower mitral repair rates had an increased likelihood of operative mortality relative to the top quartile: lowest quartile, OR 1.31 (95% CI, 1.20-1.44); second quartile, OR 1.18 (95% CI, 1.09-1.29); and third quartile, OR 1.14 (95% CI, 1.05-1.24). Long-term mortality beyond 6 months was also higher in low-volume hospitals: 5 or less cases year, hazard ratio (HR) 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.18); 6 to 10 cases per year, OR 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02-1.10) compared with hospitals performing more than 40 cases per year. Most hospitals perform few mitral valve operations on elderly patients. Greater volume of mitral procedures was associated with higher repair rates. Both greater volume of mitral procedures and increasing mitral repair rates were associated with decreased mortality. Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 09/2014; 149(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.084 · 4.17 Impact Factor
Show more