Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach.

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
International Journal of General Medicine 01/2012; 5:117-21. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S28478
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach is applicable in all clinical emergencies for immediate assessment and treatment. The approach is widely accepted by experts in emergency medicine and likely improves outcomes by helping health care professionals focusing on the most life-threatening clinical problems. In an acute setting, high-quality ABCDE skills among all treating team members can save valuable time and improve team performance. Dissemination of knowledge and skills related to the ABCDE approach are therefore needed. This paper offers a practical "how-to" description of the ABCDE approach.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In-hospital patients may suffer unexpected death because of suboptimal monitoring. Early recognition of deviating physiological parameters may enable staff to prevent unexpected in-hospital death. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term effects of systematic interprofessional use of early warning scoring, structured observation charts, and clinical algorithms for bedside action. A prospective non-randomized controlled study of unexpected in-hospital death before and after implementation of a clinical intervention in a medical and surgical ward setting at an urban Danish university hospital. Information was obtained over three four-month study periods-a pre-interventional one in 2009 (1st March-30th June), and two post-interventional ones in 2010 (1st September-31st December) and 2011 (1st March-30th June). The incidence of unexpected patient death, the primary study outcome, was calculated as the rate of unexpected patient mortality based on in-hospital risk time. The adjusted unexpected patient mortality rate was significantly lower during the second post-interventional study period than before the intervention, 17 versus 61 per 100 adjusted patient years (P=0·013), corresponding to a rate ratio of 0·271 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0·097-0·762). A tendency to reduced unexpected mortality was found during the first post-interventional study period (25 versus 61 per 100 adjusted patient years, P=0·053; rate ratio 0·404, CI 0·161-1·012). Clinical intervention comprising systematic monitoring practice, early warning scoring, an observation chart, and an algorithm for bedside management, implemented by interprofessional teaching, training, and optimization of communication and collaboration, may significantly reduce unexpected in-hospital mortality.
    Resuscitation 12/2013; · 3.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction. The aim of this study was to explore the learning effect of engaging trainees by assessing peer performance during simulation-based training. Methods. Eighty-four final year medical students participated in the study. The intervention involved trainees assessing peer performance during training. Outcome measures were in-training performance and performance, both of which were measured two weeks after the course. Trainees' performances were videotaped and assessed by two expert raters using a checklist that included a global rating. Trainees' satisfaction with the training was also evaluated. Results. The intervention group obtained a significantly higher overall in-training performance score than the control group: mean checklist score 20.87 (SD 2.51) versus 19.14 (SD 2.65) P = 0.003 and mean global rating 3.25 SD (0.99) versus 2.95 (SD 1.09) P = 0.014. Postcourse performance did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Trainees who assessed peer performance were more satisfied with the training than those who did not: mean 6.36 (SD 1.00) versus 5.74 (SD 1.33) P = 0.025. Conclusion. Engaging trainees in the assessment of peer performance had an immediate effect on in-training performance, but not on the learning outcome measured two weeks later. Trainees had a positive attitude towards the training format.
    BioMed Research International 01/2014; 2014:610591. · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To develop and pilot test the effectiveness of a patient education intervention in enhancing the self-efficacy of hospitalized patients to recognize and report symptoms of acute deteriorating conditions. Method Using cluster randomization, acute care general wards were randomized to the experimental and control groups. 34 patients in the experimental group received a 30-minute patient education intervention on Alert Worsening conditions And Report Early (AWARE) while 33 patients in the control group received routine care only. Levels of self-efficacy to recognize and report symptoms were measured before and after the intervention. Results The level of self-efficacy reported by the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (p < 0.0001). Conclusion The AWARE intervention was effective in enhancing the self-efficacy of hospitalized patients to recognize and report acute deteriorating conditions. Practical implications Patient engagement through patient education could be included in the rapid response system which aims to reduce hospital mortality and cardiac arrest rates in the general wards.
    Patient Education and Counseling 10/2014; · 2.60 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014