Article

Beneficial effects of adding ketamine to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl after the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei medical journal (impact factor: 0.77). 03/2012; 53(2):427-32. DOI:10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.427 pp.427-32
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this prospective, double-blind, randomized study was to investigate the analgesic effects of low-dose ketamine on intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with fentanyl for pain control in pediatric patients following the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum.
Sixty pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl (Group F, n=30) or fentanyl plus ketamine (Group FK, n=30). Ten minutes before the end of surgery, following the loading dose of each solution, 0.5 μg/kg/hr of fentanyl or 0.5 μg/kg/hr of fentanyl plus 0.15 mg/kg/hr of ketamine was infused via an IV-PCA pump (basal rate, 1 mL/hr; bolus, 0.5 mL; lock out interval, 30 min). Fentanyl consumption, pain score, ketorolac use, nausea/vomiting, ondansetron use, pruritus, respiratory depression, hallucination, dreaming, and parent satisfaction with pain control were measured throughout the 48 hours following surgery.
The pain scores, ketorolac use, and fentanyl consumption of Group FK were significantly lower than in Group F (p<0.05). The incidence of nausea/vomiting and ondansetron use in Group FK was significantly lower than in Group F (p<0.05). There were no reports of respiratory depression, hallucination or dreaming. Parent satisfaction with pain control was similar between the two groups.
We concluded that low-dose ketamine added to IV-PCA with fentanyl after the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients can reduce pain scores, consumption of fentanyl, and incidence of nausea/vomiting without increasing side effects.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
44 Views
  • Source
    Article: A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the results of a 10-year experience with a minimally invasive operation that requires neither cartilage incision nor resection for correction of pectus excavatum. From 1987 to 1996, 148 patients were evaluated for chest wall deformity. Fifty of 127 patients suffering from pectus excavatum were selected for surgical correction. Eight older patients underwent the Ravitch procedure, and 42 patients under age 15 were treated by the minimally invasive technique. A convex steel bar is inserted under the sternum through small bilateral thoracic incisions. The steel bar is inserted with the convexity facing posteriorly, and when it is in position, the bar is turned over, thereby correcting the deformity. After 2 years, when permanent remolding has occurred, the bar is removed in an outpatient procedure. Of 42 patients who had the minimally invasive procedure, 30 have undergone bar removal. Initial excellent results were maintained in 22, good results in four, fair in two, and poor in two, with mean follow-up since surgery of 4.6 years (range, 1 to 9.2 years). Mean follow-up since bar removal is 2.8 years (range, 6 months to 7 years). Average blood loss was 15 mL. Average length of hospital stay was 4.3 days. Patients returned to full activity after 1 month. Complications were pneumothorax in four patients, requiring thoracostomy in one patient; superficial wound infection in one patient; and displacement of the steel bar requiring revision in two patients. The fair and poor results occurred early in the series because (1) the bar was too soft (three patients), (2) the sternum was too soft in one of the patients with Marfan's syndrome, and (3) in one patient with complex thoracic anomalies, the bar was removed too soon. This minimally invasive technique, which requires neither cartilage incision nor resection, is effective. Since increasing the strength of the steel bar and inserting two bars where necessary, we have had excellent long-term results. The upper limits of age for this procedure require further evaluation.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 05/1998; 33(4):545-52. · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • Article: Postoperative analgesia with intravenous fentanyl PCA vs epidural block after thoracoscopic pectus excavatum repair in children.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare analgesia, sedation, and cardiorespiratory function in children after thoracoscopic surgery for pectus excavatum repair, using two types of analgesia--epidural block with bupivacaine plus fentanyl vs patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl. Twenty-eight patients scheduled for thoracoscopic pectus excavatum surgery were randomly assigned to receive either thoracic epidural block or i.v. PCA for postoperative analgesia. Pain was assessed using a visual-analogue scale (VAS). The Ramsay sedation score, arterial pressure, ventilatory frequency, and heart rate were also measured, and blood gas analysis was performed regularly during the first 48 h after surgery. A significant decrease in the VAS pain score, Ramsay sedation score, heart rate ventilatory frequency, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and PaCO2, and a significant increase in PaO2 and oxygen saturation were found over time. Patients in the PCA group had significantly higher PaCO2 values. In addition, a significantly slower decline of systolic blood pressure and heart rate, and faster recovery of PaCO2 were found in PCA patients than in patients with epidural block. I.V. fentanyl PCA is as effective as thoracic epidural for postoperative analgesia in children after thoracoscopic pectus excavatum repair. Bearing in mind the possible complications of epidural catheterization in children, the use of fentanyl PCA is recommended.
    BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia 06/2007; 98(5):677-81. · 4.24 Impact Factor
  • Article: Systemic postoperative pain management following minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair in children and adolescents: a retrospective comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and continuous infusion with morphine.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optimal postoperative pain management following minimally invasive surgical repair of pectus excavatum is not established. We compared efficacy and adverse effects in patients treated with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with those treated with continuous infusion (CI) with morphine in addition to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 33 patient records were examined retrospectively: 21 given PCA and 12 CI with morphine. Main outcome variables were used doses of morphine, pain scores every 3 h and adverse effects. Median (range) used morphine dose was 0.58 (0.21-1.12) and 0.52 (0.34-0.84) mg/kg on the day 1 and 0.3 (0.02-0.6) and 0.33 (0.09-0.53) mg/kg on the day 2 in PCA and CI groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Pain scores were within moderate and low levels during 42 h after surgery and did not differ between the groups. Median (range) oxygen saturation was 96.5 (93-100) and 97 (94-100) in PCA and CI groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Additional oxygen therapy was required in 14.3% in PCA group and 25% in CI group (p > 0.05). The incidence of pulmonary adverse effects was rare and did not differ between the groups. Both methods of systemic analgesia in addition to non-opioid analgesics were equally effective and resulted in a low incidence of pulmonary adverse effects.
    Pediatric Surgery International 07/2010; 26(7):665-9. · 1.25 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from

Keywords

analgesic effects
 
basal rate
 
fentanyl
 
Fentanyl consumption
 
Group F
 
Group FK
 
intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
 
IV-PCA pump
 
ketorolac use
 
low-dose ketamine
 
Nuss procedure
 
ondansetron use
 
pain control
 
pain score
 
pain scores
 
Parent satisfaction
 
pectus excavatum
 
randomized study
 
respiratory depression
 
two groups
 

Moon Ho Cha