Reliability of adult self-reported smoking history: data from the tobacco use supplement to the current population survey 2002-2003 cohort.

Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 340 Hardin Hall-North, Lincoln, NE 68583-0963, USA.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (Impact Factor: 2.81). 02/2012; 14(8):952-60. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr313
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined the reliability of self-reported smoking history measures. The key measures of interest were time since completely quitting smoking among former smokers; age at which fairly regular smoking was initiated among former and current smokers; the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the number of years of daily smoking among former smokers; and never smoking. Another goal was to examine sociodemographic factors and interview method as potential predictors of the odds of strict agreement in responses.
Data from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey were examined. Descriptive analysis was performed to detect discrepant data patterns, and intraclass and Pearson correlations and kappa coefficients were used to assess reporting consistency over the 12-month interval. Multiple logistic regression models with replicate weights were built and fitted to identify factors influencing the logit of agreement for each measure of interest.
All measures revealed at least moderate levels of overall agreement. However, upon closer examination, a few measures also showed some considerable differences in absolute value. The highest percentage of these differences was observed for former smokers' reports of the number of years smoking every day. Conclusions: Overall, the data suggest that self-reported smoking history characteristics are reliable. The logit of agreement over a 12-month period is shown to depend on a few sociodemographic characteristics as well as their interactions with each other and with interview method.


Available from: Gordon B Willis, Dec 14, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study examined consistency of reports concerning current and prior smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history were reported by self- and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. The ever-smoking status is reported consistently, overall: Kappa coefficient is 0.78 with the corresponding 95% confidence interval given by (0.77, 0.78). One specific type of inconsistency of prior reports was assessed for respondents who were identified as never smokers at the latter assessment and former or current smokers at the earlier assessment. Based on the survey logistic regression that controls for multiple respondent characteristics and survey administration method, the estimated prevalence of such inconsistent self-reports is 9.0%, and prevalence of inconsistent proxy-reports is 5.4%. In addition, prevalence of recanting, i.e., future reporting never smoking for respondents who previously claimed to be a former or a current smoker was assessed. The recanting was shown to be most prevalent with respect to proxy-reports and former smokers: overall prevalence of recanting was estimated to be in the range 13% - 19% for current smokers, and 27% - 46% for former smokers. Our findings indicate that while, unexpectedly, proxy-respondents are more likely to report the ever-smoking status consistently than do self-respondents, the proxies are also more likely to incorrectly report never smoking in the future for smokers especially regarding adolescents and young adults. Therefore, the observed higher level of consistency for proxy-respondents may be due to proxies' incorrect knowledge which leads to consistent yet ambiguous responses.
    01/2014; 3(1):1000113. DOI:10.4172/2324-9005.1000114
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Inflammation is involved in development of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD), and we hypothesize that self-reported CVD is an independent risk factor for lung cancer. Methods: Data from the Nord-TrOndelag Health Study (1984-2008) linked to the Norwegian Cancer and Death Cause Registry were analyzed stratified by smoking status. In total, 97,087 persons (1,634,967 person years) were included (never smokers 567,575 person years, former smokers 295,685 person years, current smokers 444,922 person years, and unknown 326,785 person years) and followed for an average of 15 years. The proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for self-reported CVD on lung cancer incidence rate adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, burden of tobacco smoking and chronic cough with phlegm. Results: 1080 cases of lung cancer (1.1%) occurred. A total of 5981 (6.9%) participants had at baseline or developed during follow-up self-reported CVD. After adjusting for confounders, self-reported CVD was an independent risk factor for the development of lung cancer in former (HR [95% CI] 1.74 [1.11-2.73]) and current smokers (HR [95% CI] 1.38 [1.04-1.83]), but not in never smokers (HR [95% CI] 0.87 [0.34-2.23]). Conclusions: Self-reported CVD was independently associated with increased occurrence of lung cancer in former and current smokers. CVD may be a novel risk factor for lung cancer screening.
    Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 05/2014; 9(7). DOI:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000180 · 5.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early onset of smoking is associated with heavier tobacco consumption and longer smoking careers. Consequently, obtaining accurate estimates of early smoking is a priority. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of proxy reports of the age of smoking initiation, and specifically to explore whether there are differences in the consistency of proxy-reported and self-reported smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history of participants were reported by self-and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. Sequential multiple-testing methods were used to assess significance of the differences in reported prevalence of consistent reports among specific sub-populations defined by age, gender and survey administration mode. Results indicated that self-reports are more reliable (more consistent over time) than proxy reports or mixed reports that include self-report at one time point and proxy reports at another. The rate of perfect agreement was also highest for self-reports. The impact of respondent type on the consistency of reports also depended on the target subjects' age and the survey administration mode (phone or in-person).