Full-text

Available from: Apar Kishor Ganti, Jan 09, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
119 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We conducted a pooled analysis of 869 individual newly diagnosed elderly patient data from 3 prospective international trials. At diagnosis, a geriatric assessment had been performed to assess comorbidities, cognitive and physical status. An additive scoring system (range 0-5), based on age, comorbidities, cognitive and physical conditions, was developed to identify 3 groups: fit (score=0, 39%); intermediate-fitness (score=1, 31%), and frail (score≥2, 30%). The 3-year overall survival was 84% in fit patients, 76% in intermediate-fitness patients (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.02-2.56, p=0.042) and 57% in frail patients (HR 3.57 CI 95% 2.37-5.39, p<0.001). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events at 12 months was 22.2% in fit, 26.4% in intermediate-fitness (HR 1.23, 95%CI 0.89-1.71; p 0.217) and 34.0% (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.28-2.38; p<0.001) in frail patients. The cumulative incidence of treatment discontinuation at 12 months was 16.5% in fit, 20.8% in intermediate-fitness (HR 1.41, 95%CI 1.00-2.01, p=0.052) and 31.2% (HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.57-3.09; p<0.001) in frail patients. Our frailty score predicts mortality and the risk of toxicity in elderly myeloma patients. The International Myeloma Working group proposes this score for the measurement of frailty in designing future clinical trials. These trials are registered to www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01093136 (EMN01), NCT01190787 (26866138MMY2069), and NCT01346787 (IST-CAR-506). Copyright © 2015 American Society of Hematology.
    Blood 01/2015; DOI:10.1182/blood-2014-12-615187 · 9.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine life expectancy for older women with breast cancer. Prospective longitudinal study with 10 years of follow-up data. Hospitals or collaborating tumor registries in four geographic regions (Los Angeles, California; Minnesota; North Carolina; Rhode Island). Women aged 65 and older at time of breast cancer diagnosis with Stage I to IIIA disease with measures of self-rated health (SRH) and walking ability at baseline (N = 615; 17% aged ≥80, 52% Stage I, 58% with ≥2 comorbidities). Baseline SRH, baseline self-reported walking ability, all-cause and breast cancer-specific estimated probability of 5- and 10-year survival. At the time of breast cancer diagnosis, 39% of women reported poor SRH, and 28% reported limited ability to walk several blocks. The all-cause survival curves appear to separate after approximately 3 years, and the difference in survival probability between those with low SRH and limited walking ability and those with high SRH and no walking ability limitation was significant (0.708 vs 0.855 at 5 years, P ≤ .001; 0.300 vs 0.648 at 10 years, P < .001). There were no differences between the groups in breast cancer-specific survival at 5 and 10 years (P = .66 at 5 years, P = .16 at 10 years). The combination of low SRH and limited ability to walk several blocks at diagnosis is an important predictor of worse all-cause survival at 5 and 10 years. These self-report measures easily assessed in clinical practice may be an effective strategy to improve treatment decision-making in older adults with cancer. © 2015, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2015, The American Geriatrics Society.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 04/2015; 63(4):757-62. DOI:10.1111/jgs.13340 · 4.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Guidelines recommend individualizing screening mammography decisions for women aged 75 years and older. However, little pragmatic guidance is available to help counsel patients. To provide an evidence-based approach for individualizing decision-making about screening mammography in older women. We searched PubMed for English-language studies in peer-reviewed journals published from January 1, 1990, to February 1, 2014, to identify risk factors for late-life breast cancer in women aged 65 years and older and to quantify the benefits and harms of screening mammography for women aged 75 years and older. Age is the major risk factor for developing and dying from breast cancer. Breast cancer risk factors that reflect hormonal exposures in the distant past, such as age at first birth or age at menarche, are less predictive of late-life breast cancer than factors indicating recent hormonal exposures such as high bone mass or obesity. Randomized trials of the benefits of screening mammography did not include women older than 74 years. Thus it is not known if screening mammography benefits older women. Observational studies favor extending screening mammography to older women who have a life expectancy of more than 10 years. Modeling studies estimate 2 fewer breast cancer deaths/1000 women who in their 70s continue biennial screening for 10 years instead of stopping screening at age 69. Potential harms of continued screening over 10 years include false-positive mammograms in approximately 200/1000 women screened and overdiagnosis (ie, finding breast cancer that would not have clinically surfaced otherwise) in approximately 13/1000 women screened. Providing information about life expectancy along with potential benefits and harms of screening may help older women's decision-making about screening mammography. For women with less than a 10-year life expectancy, recommendations to stop screening mammography should emphasize increased potential harms from screening and highlight health promotion measures likely to be beneficial over the short term. For women with a life expectancy of more than 10 years, deciding whether potential benefits of screening outweigh harms becomes a value judgment for patients, requiring a realistic understanding of screening outcomes.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 04/2014; 311(13):1336-47. DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.2834 · 30.39 Impact Factor