Article

Vascular complications and access crossover in 10,676 transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
American heart journal (Impact Factor: 4.65). 02/2012; 163(2):230-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.10.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Randomized trials have shown that transradial approach, compared with transfemoral, reduces vascular complications (VCs) of coronary procedures in selected patients. Yet, radial approach is associated to a variety of access-site VC as well as to a higher failure rate compared with femoral access.
At our institution, from May 2005 to May 2010, we prospectively assessed the occurrence and outcome of VC in consecutive patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures performed by trained radial operators. The need of access crossover to complete the procedure was also prospectively investigated. Vascular complications were classified as "radial related" or "nonradial related" (in the case of access crossover). Vascular complications were also classified "major" if requiring surgery and/or blood transfusions or causing hemoglobin drop >3 g/dL.
Ten thousand six hundred seventy-six procedures were performed using a right radial (87.5%), left radial (12.4%), or ulnar (0.1%) artery as primary access. A total of 53 VCs (0.5%) were observed: 44 (83%) radial related and 9 (17%) nonradial related. Major VCs occurred in 16 patients only (0.2%) and were radial related in 10 (62.5%) and nonradial related in 6 (37.5%) patients. Vascular complications rate was stable during the study and independent of operator's experience. Access crossover rate was 4.9%, differed according to the operator radial experience and significantly decreased over time.
The present study, conducted in a center with high volume of radial procedures, shows that transradial approach is associated with a very low rate of VC, which is stable over time. On the contrary, access crossover rate decreased over time and differed according to operator (radial) experience.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
248 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adoption of the transradial approach for coronary procedures is rapidly growing in the US. A decrease in vascular complications and improved patient comfort are the primary benefits of this technique compared to femoral artery access. However, as this is still an invasive procedure, it is important for operators who utilize this technique to be aware of the known complications that are associated with radial access. Radial artery occlusion and spasm are the most common issues that occur with transradial procedures. Vascular complications such as perforations, forearm hematomas and pseudoaneurysm formation are much less common.
    Current Cardiology Reports 04/2013; 15(4):350.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was performed to analyze the impact of transradial intervention (TRI), performed by long (25-cm) hydrophilic-coated radial introducer sheath (HRS), on radial artery (RA). Both acute damages and chronic intimal modifications, occurring in RA, were assessed using frequency domain-optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). FD-OCT evaluation of RA was performed in 51 consecutive patients, undergoing TRI by long (25-cm) HRS. FD-OCT was performed from RA ostium to the puncture site. Acute damages such as intimal tears and medial dissections together with chronic intimal modifications, assessed as intimal hyperplasia indexes, were observed and compared between proximal and distal RA segments. Intimal tears were detected in 37 % of patients, especially located in proximal RA segment (p = 0.09). Medial dissections were imaged in 9.8 % of patients with no significant difference between proximal and distal RA segments. Intimal hyperplasia indexes were higher in distal RA segment, with no significant association with a previous history of TRI. In the setting of TRI, performed by long HRS, intimal tears represented the main RA injury occurring in about one-third of patients, while medial dissections only occurred in a small proportion of patients. Distal RA segment was more prone to intimal thickening, although this phenomenon was not associated with repeated transradial procedures.
    The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 10/2013; · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unsuccessful radial artery puncture, inability to advance the guide catheter to the ascending aorta, and inadequate guide catheter support represent mechanisms of transradial approach failure. With the rationale of sharing the same efficacy and safety promoted by radial access, the transulnar approach represents an alternative access site for percutaneous coronary procedures. Between May 2007 and May 2012, 11,059 coronary invasive procedures were performed in a single institution: 10,108 by transradial approach (91.4%), 541 by transfemoral approach (4.9%), and 410 by transulnar approach (3.7%). Patients who underwent coronary procedures through transulnar access were included in a prospective registry of effectiveness and safety. Diagnostic procedures accounted for 71.8% of cases, and the right ulnar access was the most common route (88.9%). Procedure success was high (98.5%), with a crossover rate of 1.5% (6 cases), of which 5 were achieved through the contralateral radial access and 1 through femoral approach. Complications related to access site were low (3.9%), consisting mostly of minor bleeding due to subcutaneous hematomas. There were no cases of major bleeding, nerve injury, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or necessity of vascular surgical repair. The transulnar approach represents an alternative to the transradial approach in selected cases when performed by radial-trained operators, sharing a high success rate and extremely low incidence of access-site complications.
    American heart journal 10/2012; 164(4):462-7. · 4.65 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
76 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014