Open lateral patellar retinacular lengthening versus open retinacular release in lateral patellar hypercompression syndrome: a prospective double-blinded comparative study on complications and outcome.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, Switzerland.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.1). 01/2012; 28(6):788-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare complication rates and outcome of open lateral retinacular (LR) lengthening and open LR release in the treatment of lateral patellar hypercompression syndrome (LPHS).
In a prospective double-blinded study, 28 patients (mean age, 48 years; 21 women and 7 men) received either LR release (14 patients) or LR lengthening (14 patients) in alternating fashion over the same lateral parapatellar skin incision for LPHS (blinding of patients to surgical procedure [i.e., single blinding]). Strict inclusion criteria (retinacular pain, tight retinaculum, decreased patellar mobility) were used to exclude other reasons for anterior knee pain (patellar instability, leg malalignment or maltorsion, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta). The surgeon and postsurgical rehabilitation were the same. Preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, complications, muscle atrophy, and Kujala patellofemoral outcome score were documented by examiners blinded to the surgical procedure (double blinding). All patients completed 2 years of follow-up.
The results of 2 years of follow-up showed that recurrence of LPHS, as indicated by the patellar tilt test and decreased medial patellar glide test, developed in 2 cases after LR release and 1 case after LR lengthening (P > .999). Medial patellar subluxation, as indicated by the gravitation-subluxation test and increased medial patellar glide test, developed in 5 cases after LR release and no case after LR lengthening (P = .041). Quadriceps atrophy, as indicated by the mean circumference difference compared with the healthy contralateral side, was significantly higher (P = .001) in the LR release group (1.8 cm) than in the LR lengthening group (0.2 cm). The mean Kujala score was significantly lower (P = .035) in the LR release group (77.2 points) than in the LR lengthening group (88.4 points).
In this prospective double-blinded study, retinacular lengthening showed less medial instability, less quadriceps atrophy, and a better clinical outcome at 2 years compared with retinacular release. We believe that this may be explained by the controlled preservation of the lateral patellar muscle-capsuloligamentous continuity after retinacular lengthening.
Level II, prospective double-blinded comparative study.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively and systematically review the current evidence for orthopaedic treatment of immature and adolescent patients with acute and chronic patellar instability. METHODS: We searched the online databases PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant publications on patellar instability. All dates and languages were included. RESULTS: Twenty articles reporting on a total of 456 knees in 425 patients (131 male patients, 294 female patients) followed-up for 56.7 ± 42.2 months on average were included in the analysis. Two studies focused specifically on conservative versus surgical treatment in acute dislocations and reported no difference in outcomes after 7 and 14 years, even in the face of slight trochlear dysplasia. For recurrent instability, we found consistent beneficial effects from surgical stabilization on clinical scores, postoperative stability, and radiographic assessment. There is no evidence for growth disturbance with surgical patellar stabilization in immature patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current best evidence does not support the superiority of surgical intervention over conservative treatment in an acute patellar dislocation. However, anatomic variations and their effect on healing should be considered and included in decision making. In recurrent patellar instability in pediatric and adolescent patients with normal or restored knee anatomy, reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most effective treatment option and can be done safely, together with extensor realignment as needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of mixed-level studies.
    Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 05/2013; · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The lateral parapatellar approach, despite providing direct access to the pathological area has not been widely accepted for knee arthroplasty in valgus deformities. We performed a modified lateral (Keblish) approach which consisted of coronal z plasty of lateral retinaculum, quadriceps snip, titrated sequential lateral release and closure with expanded lateral structures in 32 arthritic fixed valgus knees. In 30 knees, either tendon of popliteus or lateral collateral ligament or both could be preserved. At an average follow-up of 5years, the valgus alignment improved from 25.4° (11°-60°) to 4° (0°-10°) and knee society score improved from 34 to 95 points. There was no late instability or revisions. This approach is rational, eliminates patella maltracking, is applicable in severe deformities and with titrated release, can preserve the posterolateral knee stabilizers that are necessary for long term implant survival.
    The Journal of arthroplasty 05/2013; · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patellofemoral instability not only involves lateral patellar dislocation, patellar mal-tracking or subluxation but can also cause a limiting disability for sports activities. Its underlying causes are known as morphological anomalies of the patellofemoral joint or the mechanical axis, femorotibial malrotation, variants of the knee extensor apparatus, and ligamentous insufficiencies often accompanied by poor proprioception. Athletes with such predisposing factors are either suffering from unspecific anterior knee pain or from slightly traumatic or recurrent lateral patellar dislocation Treatment options of patellar instability are vast, and need to be tailored individually depending on the athlete's history, age, complaints and physical demands. Different conservative and surgical treatment options are reviewed and discussed, especially limited expectations after surgery.
    Orthopedic Reviews 07/2013; 5(3):e23.


Available from
May 31, 2014