A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients.

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants (Impact Factor: 1.49). 01/2012; 27(1):102-10.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the incidence and types of biologic and technical complications associated with implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) for edentulous patients.
An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled clinical trials and prospective cohort studies with IFCDPs for edentulous patients. Reports with at least 5 years of follow-up after prosthesis insertion were selected. Pooled data were analyzed statistically, and the cumulative complication rates were calculated by meta-analysis and regression.
Of a total of 281 one-piece IFCDPs (mean exposure time of 9.5 years) and 653 complication events, the complication rate was estimated at 24.6% per 100 restoration-years. The cumulative rates of "prosthesis free of complications" after 5 and 10 years were 29.3% and 8.6%, respectively. The most common implantrelated biologic complication was peri-implant bone loss (> 2 mm), at rates of 20.1% after 5 years and 40.3% after 10 years. The most frequent implant-related technical complication was screw fracture, yielding a 5-year complication rate of 10.4% and a 10-year rate of 20.8%. The most frequent prosthesis-related biologic complication was hypertrophy or hyperplasia of tissue around the IFCDPs (13.0% and 26.0% after 5 and 10 years, respectively). The most common prosthesis-related technical complication reported with IFCDPs was chipping or fracture of the veneering material (33.3% at 5 years and 66.6% at 10 years).
Biologic and technical complications after the placement of IFCDPs occur continuously over time as a result of fatigue and stress. These events may not lead to implant/prosthetic failures, but they are significant in relation to the amount of repair and maintenance needed, time, and cost to both the clinician and patient.

Download full-text


Available from: Panos Papaspyridakos, Aug 28, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the presence of a prefabricated cobalt-chromium (CoCr) margin in a universal castable long abutment (UCLA) on the sealing capability and fit of the implant-abutment interface. Materials and Methods: One-hundred twenty external hexagon implants (SIN) were divided into two groups (n = 60 each) to receive UCLA abutments from six manufacturers (n = 10 each) either with or without a CoCr margin (n = 60 each). Abutments were cast and 12 groups were formed: M (Microplant), I (Impladen), S (SIN), Sv (Signo Vinces), T (TitaniumFix), and B (Bionnovation). Sealing was determined by placing 0.7 µL of 0.1% toluidine blue in the implant wells before abutment torquing. Implant-abutment samples were placed into 2.0-mL vials containing 0.7 mL of distilled water to maintain the implant-abutment interface, and aliquots of 100 µL of water were retrieved at 1, 3, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 144 hour incubation times for measurement of absorbance in a spectrophotometer, and returned for repeated measurements. Two-way ANOVA (P < .05) and Tukey's test were used. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for observation of the implant-abutment fit. Results: Groups M, Sv, and T without the CoCr margin resulted in complete release of toluidine blue at 1 hour, whereas I, S, and B did so at 3, 24, and 96 hours, respectively. Complete leakage in abutments with the prefabricated margin occurred at 6 hours for S; 24 hours for Sv, T, and B; and 72 hours for M and I. Implant-abutment gaps were observed in all groups. A poorer fit was depicted for groups M and T without the CoCr margin. Conclusion: Complete leakage was observed for all UCLA abutments regardless of the presence of the CoCr margin. Implant-abutment gaps were observed in all groups.
    The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 01/2014; 29(1):113-20. DOI:10.11607/jomi.3217 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The peri-implant diseases, namely peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, have been extensively studied in literature. However, little is known about the true magnitude of the problem mainly due to the lack of consistent and definite diagnostic criteria used to describe the condition. The objective of the present review is to systematically estimate the overall frequency of peri-implant diseases in general and high-risk group participants Methods: The systematic review was prepared according to the guidelines of Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement. Studies were searched in four electronic databases and complemented by hand searching. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the guidelines of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) and the data were analyzed using statistical software. Results: A total of 504 studies were identified. Of which, nine studies with 1497 participants and 6283 implants were included. The summary estimates for the frequency of peri-implant mucositis were 63.4% of participants and 30.7% of implants, while those of peri-implantitis were estimated at 18.8% of participants and 9.6% of implants. A higher frequency of occurrence of peri-implant diseases were recorded for smokers with a summary estimate of 36.3%. However, the implantation of supportive periodontal therapy seemed to reduce the rate of occurrence of peri-implant diseases. Conclusions: Peri-implant diseases are not an uncommon late outcome following implant therapy. Long-term maintenance care for high risk groups is essential to reduce the risk of peri-implantitis. Informed consents for patients receiving implant treatment must include the need for such maintenance therapy.
    Journal of Periodontology 12/2012; 84(11). DOI:10.1902/jop.2012.120592 · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare two different impression techniques for implants in totally edentulous patients. Materials and methods: A total of 38 patients had impressions taken both using plaster and splinted vinyl polysiloxane (splinted-VPS). Two casts per patient were generated and allocated as test (plaster) and control (splinted-VPS) cast groups according to a randomised cross-over design. One of the two casts from each patient was randomly selected as master cast according to a parallelgroup design and used to fabricate the definitive prosthesis. Outcome measures were implant and prosthetic success rates, complications, marginal bone level (MBL) changes, patient satisfaction, chair time required to take the impressions, inter-implant discrepancy between the casts, sulcus bleeding index (SBI) and plaque score (PS). Results: In total, 76 impressions were taken in 38 patients. Two plaster impressions failed. Furthermore, 38 computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing screw-retained complete-arch prostheses were fabricated onto the master cast (18 from plaster and 20 from splinted-VPS impressions) and the patients were followed up for 3 years after loading. No drop-out occurred and no implants or prostheses failed, accounting for a cumulative implant and prosthesis survival rate of 100% over the 3-year post-loading period. Plaster impressions yielded significantly greater patient satisfaction and shorter chair time. The discrepancy between the casts was 0.055 ± 0.067 mm (P = 0.931). Mixed model analysis revealed a significant main effect from both the implant number and the inter-implant distance, while no difference was found with regard to implant angulation. Five chip-off fractures of the porcelain veneer occurred in 5 of the 38 patients (3 in restorations fabricated onto the plaster cast group and 2 in the splinted-VPS cast group) with no effect from the type of impression on the prosthetic success rate (P = 0.331). However, all of the patients were functionally and aesthetically satisfied with their prostheses. Furthermore, mean MBL, SBI and PS showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the groups. Conclusions: The clinical outcome of plaster impressions for completely edentulous patients was found to be the same as that for splinted-VPS impressions. The intraoral pre-scan resin framework try-in can be avoided. Plaster impressions may be less time consuming and thus more comfortable for the patient, but sometimes may have to be repeated due to fractures. Conflict-of-interest statement: All materials used in this study were purchased by the authors and there were no commercial or institutional interests.
    European Journal of Oral Implantology 01/2013; 6(4):325-40. · 2.02 Impact Factor