The purposes of this study were to identify distinct subgroups of patients based on self-reported sleep disturbance prior to through 6 months after breast cancer surgery and evaluate for differences in demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics among these latent classes.
Women (n = 398) who underwent unilateral breast cancer surgery were enrolled prior to surgery. Patients completed measures of functional status, sleep disturbance (i.e., General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS); higher scores indicate higher levels of sleep disturbance), fatigue, attentional fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety prior to surgery and monthly for 6 months.
Three distinct classes of sleep disturbance trajectories were identified using growth mixture modeling. The high sustained class (55.0%) had high and the low sustained class (39.7%) had low GSDS scores prior to surgery that persisted for 6 months. The decreasing class (5.3%) had high GSDS score prior to surgery that decreased over time. Women in the high sustained class were significantly younger, had more comorbidity and poorer function, and were more likely to report hot flashes compared to the low sustained class. More women who underwent mastectomy or breast reconstruction were in the decreasing class. Decreasing and high sustained classes reported higher levels of physical fatigue, attentional fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety compared to the low sustained class.
A high percentage of women has significant sleep disturbance prior to surgery that persists during subsequent treatments (i.e., radiation therapy and chemotherapy). Clinicians need to perform routine assessments and initiate appropriate interventions to improve sleep prior to and following surgery.
"Unconditional GMM with robust maximum likelihood estimation was carried out to identify latent classes with distinct sleep disturbance trajectories using Mplus Version 5.21. These methods are described in detail elsewhere (Van Onselen et al., 2012). In brief, a single growth curve that represented the " average " change trajectory was estimated for the whole sample. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To attempt to replicate the associations found in our previous study of patients and family caregivers between interleukin 6 (IL6) and nuclear factor kappa beta 2 (NFKB2) and sleep disturbance and to identify additional genetic associations in a larger sample of patients with breast cancer.
Patients with breast cancer (n = 398) were recruited prior to surgery and followed for six months. Patients completed a self-report measure of sleep disturbance and provided a blood sample for genomic analyses. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify distinct latent classes of patients with higher and lower levels of sleep disturbance.
Patients who were younger and who had higher comorbidity and lower functional status were more likely to be in the high sustained sleep disturbance class. Variations in three cytokine genes (i.e., IL1 receptor 2 (IL1R2), IL13, NFKB2) predicted latent class membership.
Polymorphisms in cytokine genes may partially explain inter-individual variability in sleep disturbance. Determination of high risk phenotypes and associated molecular markers may allow for earlier identification of patients at higher risk for developing sleep disturbance and lead to the development of more targeted clinical interventions.
European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 09/2013; 18(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2013.08.004 · 1.43 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate for differences in occurrence and severity ratings of sleep disturbance, fatigue, and decreased energy in women who reported breast pain prior to surgery for breast cancer. Of the 390 women who completed self-report measures for each symptom, 28.2% reported pain in their breast prior to surgery. A higher percentage of women in the pain group (i.e., 66.7% versus 53.5%) reported clinically meaningful levels of sleep disturbance. However, no between group differences were found in the severity of sleep disturbance, fatigue, or decreased energy. Findings from this study suggest that sleep disturbance, fatigue, and decreased levels of energy are significant problems for women prior to breast cancer surgery. Future studies need to evaluate for specific characteristics that place women at greater risk for these symptoms as well as the mechanisms that underlie these symptoms.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 07/2012; 22(3). DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2012.07.007 · 2.38 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Purpose:
In this prospective, longitudinal study, we extend our findings on persistent breast pain in patients (n = 398) following breast cancer surgery and evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of persistent pain in the arm/shoulder. In addition, differences in the severity of common symptoms and quality of life outcomes measured prior to surgery, among the arm pain classes, were evaluated.
Methods and sample:
Patients were recruited from Breast Care Centers located in a Comprehensive Cancer Center, two public hospitals, and four community practices. Patients were assessed prior to and monthly for six months following breast cancer surgery.
Using growth mixture modeling, patients were classified into no (41.6%), mild (23.6%), and moderate (34.8%) arm pain classes based on ratings of worst arm/shoulder pain. Compared to the no pain class, patients in the moderate pain class were significantly younger, had a higher body mass index, and were more likely to report preoperative breast pain and swelling in the affected breast. In addition, patients in the moderate pain class reported higher levels of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance than the no pain class.
Findings suggest that approximately 35% of women experience persistent levels of moderate arm/shoulder pain in the first six months following breast cancer surgery. Moderate arm/shoulder pain is associated with clinically meaningful decrements in functional status and quality of life.
The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society 12/2012; 13(12):1172-87. DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.09.013 · 4.01 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.