Article

Dosimetric research on intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy planning for left breast cancer after breast-preservation surgery.

School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan, China.
Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (Impact Factor: 1.26). 01/2012; 37(3):287-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2011.11.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has played an important role in breast cancer radiotherapy after breast-preservation surgery. Our aim was to study the dosimetric and implementation features/feasibility between IMRT and intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy (Varian RapidArc, Varian, Palo Alto, CA). The forward IMRT plan (f-IMRT), the inverse IMRT, and the RapidArc plan (RA) were generated for 10 patients. Afterward, we compared the target dose distribution of the 3 plans, radiation dose on organs at risk, monitor units, and treatment time. All 3 plans met clinical requirements, with RA performing best in target conformity. In target homogeneity, there was no statistical significance between RA and IMRT, but both of homogeneity were less than f-IMRT's. With regard to the V(5) and V(10) of the left lung, those in RA were higher than in f-IMRT but were lower than in IMRT; for V(20) and V(30), the lowest was observed in RA; and in the V(5) and V(10) of the right lung, as well as the mean dose in normal-side breast and right lung, there was no statistically significance difference between RA and IMRT, and the lowest value was observed in f-IMRT. As for the maximum dose in the normal-side breast, the lowest value was observed in RA. Regarding monitor units (MUs), those in RA were higher than in f-IMRT but were lower than in IMRT. Treatment time of RA was 84.6% and 88.23% shorter than f-IMRT and IMRT, respectively, on average. Compared with f-IMRT and IMRT, RA performed better in target conformity and can reduce high-dose volume in the heart and left lung-which are related to complications-significantly shortening treatment time as well. Compared with IMRT, RA can also significantly reduce low-dose volume and MUs of the afflicted lung.

1 Bookmark
 · 
124 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thousands of women diagnosed with breast cancer each year receive breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. For women with left-sided breast cancer, there is risk of potential cardiotoxicity from the radiation therapy. As data have become available to quantify the risk of cardiotoxicity from radiation, strategies have also developed to reduce the dose of radiation to the heart without compromising radiation dose to the breast. Several broad categories of techniques to reduce cardiac radiation doses include breath hold techniques, prone positioning, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and accelerated partial breast irradiation, as well as many small techniques to improve traditional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. This review summarizes the published scientific literature on the various techniques to decrease cardiac irradiation in women treated to the left breast for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.
    Frontiers in Oncology 11/2014; 4:327.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effects of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and/or voluntary moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (vmDIBH) in the radiation therapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer including the regional lymph nodes. For 13 patients, four treatment combinations were compared; 3D-conformal RT (i.e., forward IMRT) in free-breathing 3D-CRT(FB), 3D-CRT(vmDIBH), 2 partial arcs VMAT(FB), and VMAT(vmDIBH). Prescribed dose was 42.56Gy in 16 fractions. For 10 additional patients, 3D-CRT and VMAT in vmDIBH only were also compared. Dose conformity, PTV coverage, ipsilateral and total lung doses were significantly better for VMAT plans compared to 3D-CRT. Mean heart dose (Dmean,heart) reduction in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) was between 0.9 and 8.6Gy, depending on initial Dmean,heart (in 3D-CRT(FB) plans). VMAT(vmDIBH) reduced the Dmean,heart further when Dmean,heart was still >3.2Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH). Mean contralateral breast dose was higher for VMAT plans (2.7Gy) compared to 3DCRT plans (0.7Gy). VMAT and 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) significantly reduced heart dose for patients treated with locoregional RT of left-sided breast cancer. When Dmean,heart exceeded 3.2Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) plans, VMAT(vmDIBH) resulted in a cumulative heart dose reduction. VMAT also provided better target coverage and reduced ipsilateral lung dose, at the expense of a small increase in the dose to the contralateral breast.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 05/2014; · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To compare 3 different treatment positions in whole breast radiation therapy in terms of target volume coverage and doses to the organs at risk (OAR). Methods and Materials Thirty-four breast cancer (BC) patients (17 right-sided and 17 left-sided) were included in this dosimetric planning study. They all underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan in standard supine position in free-breathing (FB), supine position with gating in deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH)(G), and prone position (P). Three-dimensional treatment plans were made for all 3 CTs. Target coverage and OAR sparing were evaluated. Results Breast volumes varied between 209 and 2814 cm3. The target coverage, expressed as the mean volume of the breast receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose, was similar for the 3 treatment positions. The mean lung dose and the volume of the lungs receiving > 20 Gy were significantly lower in P (1.7 Gy; 2.3%) compared with G (3.4 Gy; 5.6%; P < .0001) and FB (4 Gy; 7.3%; P < .0001). The volume of the contralateral breast receiving > 5 Gy was significantly lower in G (P = .001) or FB (P = .004) versus prone. The supine position with gating in DIBH significantly reduced the volume of the heart receiving > 30 Gy (V30heart), the mean heart (Dheart), and mean left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dose (DLAD) for left-sided BC patients (V30heart 0.9%, Dheart 1.6 Gy, DLAD 22.4 Gy) with respect to FB (V30heart 4.3%, Dheart 3.5 Gy, DLAD 30.9 Gy)(V30heart and mean Dheart: P ≤ .0001; mean DLAD: P = .008) and P (V30heart 7.9%, Dheart 5.4 Gy, DLAD 36.4 Gy)(V30heart and mean Dheart: P = .0004; mean DLAD: P = .01). Conclusions The coverage of the planning target volume breast was equal for the 3 treatment positions. The lowest doses to the lungs were achieved in prone. The heart, LAD, and contralateral breast were best spared in the supine position with gating in DIBH.
    Practical Radiation Oncology. 03/2014; 4(2):123–129.