Article

Long-term Auto-Servoventilation or Constant Positive Pressure in Heart Failure and Coexisting Central With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Institute of Pneumology at the University Witten/Herdecke, Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Center of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Bethanien Hospital, Solingen, Germany.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 01/2012; 142(2):440-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-2089
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The coexistence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is common in patients with heart failure (HF). While CPAP improves CSA/CSR by about 50%, maximal suppression is crucial in improving clinical outcomes. Auto-servoventilation (ASV) effectively suppresses CSA/CSR in HF, but few trials have been performed in patients with coexisting OSA and CSA/CSR. Our objective was to evaluate a randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy of ASV and CPAP in reducing breathing disturbances and improving cardiac parameters in patients with HF and coexisting sleep-disordered breathing.
Both modes were delivered using the BiPAP autoSV (Philips Respironics) over a 12-month period. Seventy patients (63 men, 66.3 ± 9.1 y, BMI 31.3 ± 6.0 kg/m(2)) had coexisting OSA and CSA/CSR, arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, or cardiomyopathy and clinical signs of heart failure New York Heart Association classes II-III. Polysomnography, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), spiroergometry, and echocardiography were performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of treatment.
Both modes of therapy significantly improved respiratory disturbances, oxygen desaturations, and arousals over the study period. ASV reduced the central apnea hypopnea index (baseline CPAP, 21.8 ± 11.7; ASV, 23.1 ± 13.2; 12 months CPAP, 10.7 ± 8.7; ASV, 6.1 ± 7.8, P < .05) and BNP levels (baseline CPAP, 686.7 ± 978.7 ng/mL; ASV, 537.3 ± 891.8; 12 months CPAP, 847.3 ± 1848.1; ASV, 230.4 ± 297.4; P < .05) significantly more effectively as compared with CPAP. There were no relevant differences in exercise performance and echocardiographic parameters between the groups.
ASV improved CSA/CSR and BNP over a 12-month period more effectively than CPAP.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
108 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although the gold standard for the treatment of OSA, CPAP may not be the optimal modality to treat more complex sleep disordered breathing such as Cheyne-Stokes respirations, opioid-induced central apnea, and complex sleep disordered breathing related to chronic hypoventilation syndromes (obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, restrictive thoracic disease due to neuromuscular or thoracic cage disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Newer generation auto-adjusting PAP devices are increasingly being used to treat OSA. Advanced positive airway pressure modalities have been developed in an effort to improve treatment of the more complex sleep disordered breathing syndromes including automated servo ventilation and volume-targeted pressure-limited ventilation. This article is intended to provide the clinician reader with a description of newer PAP modalities, a review of evidence-supported indications for use, as well as to provide a framework for managing patients with advanced positive airway pressure therapy.
    Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 10/2014; 35(5):593-603. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1390067 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart failure (HF) is a life-threatening disease and is a growing public health concern. Despite recent advances in pharmacological management for HF, the morbidity and mortality from HF remain high. Therefore, non-pharmacological approaches for HF are being developed. However, most non-pharmacological approaches are invasive, have limited indication and are considered only for advanced HF. Accordingly, the development of less invasive, non-pharmacological approaches that improve outcomes for patients with HF is important. One such approach may include positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. In this review, the role of PAP therapy applied through mask interfaces in the wide spectrum of HF care is discussed.
    World Journal of Cardiology (WJC) 11/2014; 6(11):1175-1191. DOI:10.4330/wjc.v6.i11.1175 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is a positive pressure ventilator support system to normalize ventilation in patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR). The latest generation enhanced ASV device (PaceWave™; ResMed) has a new feature-auto-adjustment of EPAP. This study tested the hypothesis that enhanced ASV with auto-adjustment of EPAP (PaceWave™) is non-inferior to conventional ASV (AutoSet™CS). This prospective, randomized, crossover, single-center study enrolled adult patients with stable heart failure (HF) and moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) who had been receiving conventional ASV therapy for at least 4 weeks. Patients received conventional ASV for one night and enhanced ASV on another night. Support settings for the two ASV devices were similar, with fixed expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) set to between 4 and 10 cm H2O and variable EPAP set to between 4 and 15 cm H2O. Full polysomnography was performed during ASV therapy on both nights. Endpoints were the number of nocturnal respiratory events and oxygen desaturations, and changes in blood pressure (BP). Levels of EPAP were comparable during the use of enhanced and conventional ASV, but minimum and maximum inspiratory pressure support values were significantly higher with the PaceWave™ device. All measures of apnea and hypopnea, and oxygen saturation, were significantly improved during ASV therapy with either device. There were no significant changes in BP or heart rate. Enhanced ASV is non-inferior to ASV with fixed EPAP in patients with chronic HF and CSR, with a trend towards better control of respiratory events.
    Sleep And Breathing 11/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11325-014-1083-9 · 2.87 Impact Factor