Validation of the three-factor model of the PSQI in a large sample of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients

Department of General Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.
Journal of psychosomatic research (Impact Factor: 2.74). 02/2012; 72(2):111-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.11.004
Source: PubMed


To evaluate whether a 3-factor model of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale would fit the constellation of sleep disturbances in patients with a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).
Consecutive CFS patients filled out the PSQI. Scores from this self-report questionnaire were examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
413 CFS patients were included for analysis in this study. CFA showed that the 7 PSQI component scores clustered into the 3 factors reported by Cole et al. (2006), i.e. Sleep Efficiency, Perceived Sleep Quality and Daily Disturbances. In contrast with the single-factor and all 2-factor models, all factor loadings were significant, and all goodness-of-fit values were acceptable.
In CFS, the PSQI operates as a 3-factor scoring model as initially seen in healthy and depressed older adults. The separation into 3 discrete factors suggests the limited usefulness of the global PSQI as a single factor for the assessment of subjective sleep quality, as also evidenced by a low Cronbach's alpha (0.64) in this patient sample.

Download full-text


Available from: Liesbeth Delesie,
  • Source
    • "Higher scores indicate more functional limitations due to fatigue. Pain was scored using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) [23], a validated instrument composed of 15 numerically scaled questions rated from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). These items measure two dimensions of subjective pain: sensory (11 items) and affective (4 items). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a complex condition, characterized by severe disabling fatigue with no known cause, no established diagnostic tests, and no universally effective treatment. Several studies have proposed symptomatic treatment with coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) supplementation. The primary endpoint was to assess the effect of CoQ10 plus NADH supplementation on age-predicted maximum heart rate (max HR) during a cycle ergometer test. Secondary measures included fatigue, pain and sleep. A proof-of-concept, 8-week, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in 80 CFS patients assigned to receive either CoQ10 plus NADH supplementation or matching placebo twice daily. Maximum HR was evaluated at baseline and at end of the run-in period using an exercise test. Fatigue, pain and sleep were evaluated at baseline, and then reassessed at 4- and 8-weeks through self-reported questionnaires. The CoQ10 plus NADH group showed a significant reduction in max HR during a cycle ergometer test at week 8 versus baseline (P = 0.022). Perception of fatigue also showed a decrease through all follow-up visits in active group versus placebo (P = 0.03). However, pain and sleep did not improve in the active group. Coenzyme Q10 plus NADH was generally safe and well tolerated. Our results suggest that CoQ10 plus NADH supplementation for 8 weeks is safe and potentially effective in reducing max HR during a cycle ergometer test and also on fatigue in CFS. Further additional larger controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical trial registrationThis trial was registered at as NCT02063126. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
    Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 07/2015; 121. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.010 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "), critical as to move away from a focus on fatigue by including positive indicators of energy. Overall, the separation of the PSQI into three distinct factors underscores the claim from previous studies that the global PSQI has limited usefulness as a single factor (Mariman et al., 2012). Indeed, a more heterogeneous approach involves the recognition that sleep and day-related parameters can be distinguished and that, in turn, sleep outcomes can be differentiated into more refined categories. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although ample research has shown the satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as defined within Self-Determination Theory, to be related to well-being, the relation with sleep-related functioning has not yet been examined. Hence, the present study explored the association between basic psychological need satisfaction and subjective measures of sleep and daytime dysfunction, as well as the explanatory role of need satisfaction in the relation between mindfulness and financial strain and these outcomes, in an adult sample (N = 215, 61% female; Mean age = 31). The results indicated that low psychological need satisfaction related to poor sleep quality, lower sleep quantity, and more daytime dysfunction. Finally, mindfulness and financial strain related, respectively, negatively and positively to poor sleep quality and daytime dysfunction through need satisfaction, suggesting that need satisfaction represents a critical explanatory mechanism. The role of psychological need satisfaction in the adequate regulation and satisfaction of the physiological need for sleep is discussed.
    Personality and Individual Differences 04/2015; 77. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.003 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "NA Mariman et al. 2012 [63] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review appraises the process of development and the measurement properties of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), gauging its potential as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in non-clinical and clinical samples; it also compares non-clinical and clinical populations in terms of PSQI scores. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and HAPI databases were searched. Critical appraisal of studies of measurement properties was performed using COSMIN. Of 37 reviewed studies, 22 examined construct validity, 19 - known-group validity, 15 - internal consistency, and three - test-retest reliability. Study quality ranged from poor to excellent, with the majority designated fair. Internal consistency, based on Cronbach's alpha, was good. Discrepancies were observed in factor analytic studies. In non-clinical and clinical samples with known differences in sleep quality, the PSQI global scores and all subscale scores, with the exception of sleep disturbance, differed significantly. The best evidence synthesis for the PSQI showed strong reliability and validity, and moderate structural validity in a variety of samples, suggesting the tool fulfills its intended utility. A taxonometric analysis can contribute to better understanding of sleep dysfunction as either a dichotomous or continuous construct. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Sleep Medicine Reviews 02/2015; 96(10). DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2015.01.009 · 8.51 Impact Factor
Show more