Psychometric properties of the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale in a large community sample

School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Journal of psychosomatic research (Impact Factor: 2.84). 02/2012; 72(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.10.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose was to examine the psychometric properties of the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale.
From a randomly selected sample of the general population (N=5000), 2327 participants completed a survey on nighttime symptoms, daytime symptoms, health outcomes, and psychological processes. The study sample consisted of 1890 participants who did not fulfill criteria for a sleep disorder other than insomnia.
Findings indicated that the PSAS did not produce an adequate factorial solution. When three problematic items were removed, the solution, accounting for 48.5% of the variance, improved (PSAS-13). One subscale, cognitive arousal (α=.88), consisted of five items (37.1%), and one subscale, somatic arousal (α=.72), of eight items (11.4%). The two factors were significantly inter-correlated (ρ=.51) and associated with the PSAS-13 (ρ=.91, ρ=.80). Among those with insomnia, a shortened PSAS (PSAS-14) was established, which consisted of a cognitive and a somatic subscale (48.6% of the variance). The PSAS-13 and the two subscales showed discriminant validity between three sleep groups (normal sleep, poor sleep, and insomnia disorder) (R(2)=.24-.34). The PSAS-13 and the subscales demonstrated convergent validity with measures on sleep-related worry, sleep-related beliefs, anxiety, and depression. The PSAS-13 and the two subscales were significantly correlated with sleep parameters and daytime impairment.
Though acceptable psychometric properties were established for the PSAS, the cognitive subscale's focus upon general pre-sleep arousal and the relatively low variance accounted for calls for further work on and a possible re-conceptualization of the PSAS.


Available from: Markus Jansson-Fröjmark, Jun 12, 2015
  • APSS; 01/2010
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differences between subjective sleep perception and sleep determined by polysomnography (PSG) are prevalent, particularly in patients with primary insomnia, indicating that the two measures are partially independent. To identify individualized treatment strategies, it is important to understand the potentially different mechanisms influencing subjective and PSG-determined sleep. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent three major components of insomnia models, i.e. sleep effort, dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, and presleep arousal, are associated with subjective insomnia severity and PSG- determined sleep. A sample of 47 patients with primary insomnia according to DSM-IV criteria and 52 good sleeper controls underwent 2 nights of PSG and completed the Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale, the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale, the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale and the Insomnia Severity Index. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of the three predictors on subjective insomnia severity and PSG- determined total sleep time. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender, depressive symptoms and group status. The results showed that subjective insomnia severity was associated positively with sleep effort. PSG-determined total sleep time was associated negatively with somatic presleep arousal and dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep. This pattern of results provides testable hypotheses for prospective studies on the impact of distinct cognitive and somatic variables on subjective insomnia severity and PSG-determined total sleep time. © 2015 European Sleep Research Society.
    Journal of Sleep Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1111/jsr.12293 · 2.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder whose origin is attributed to various variables. The current study aims to predict the symptoms of insomnia by investigating some of its predictors. Methods Numerous variables such as depression and anxiety symptoms, worry, pre-sleep arousal (cognitive arousal and somatic arousal), dysfunctional cognitions and metacognitive beliefs about sleep were assessed as insomnia predictors. 400 students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences completed Depression- Anxiety- Stress Scale (DASS), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS), Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-10), Metacognitions Questionnaire-insomnia (MCQ-I), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Results All variables were significantly correlated with insomnia symptoms (P<0.001). Stepwise multiple regression analysis suggested a predictive model for insomnia including cognitive arousal, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, metacognitive beliefs about sleep, and depressive symptoms. Conclusions The findings underline the significant role of cognitive and metacognitive variables for predicting insomnia symptoms. Moreover, the results suggest that metacognitive beliefs about sleep may need to be considered as a significant component in the context of insomnia.
    EXPLORE The Journal of Science and Healing 07/2014; 10(4). DOI:10.1016/j.explore.2014.04.005 · 0.94 Impact Factor