Psychometric properties of the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale in a large community sample.

School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Journal of psychosomatic research (Impact Factor: 2.91). 02/2012; 72(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.10.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose was to examine the psychometric properties of the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale.
From a randomly selected sample of the general population (N=5000), 2327 participants completed a survey on nighttime symptoms, daytime symptoms, health outcomes, and psychological processes. The study sample consisted of 1890 participants who did not fulfill criteria for a sleep disorder other than insomnia.
Findings indicated that the PSAS did not produce an adequate factorial solution. When three problematic items were removed, the solution, accounting for 48.5% of the variance, improved (PSAS-13). One subscale, cognitive arousal (α=.88), consisted of five items (37.1%), and one subscale, somatic arousal (α=.72), of eight items (11.4%). The two factors were significantly inter-correlated (ρ=.51) and associated with the PSAS-13 (ρ=.91, ρ=.80). Among those with insomnia, a shortened PSAS (PSAS-14) was established, which consisted of a cognitive and a somatic subscale (48.6% of the variance). The PSAS-13 and the two subscales showed discriminant validity between three sleep groups (normal sleep, poor sleep, and insomnia disorder) (R(2)=.24-.34). The PSAS-13 and the subscales demonstrated convergent validity with measures on sleep-related worry, sleep-related beliefs, anxiety, and depression. The PSAS-13 and the two subscales were significantly correlated with sleep parameters and daytime impairment.
Though acceptable psychometric properties were established for the PSAS, the cognitive subscale's focus upon general pre-sleep arousal and the relatively low variance accounted for calls for further work on and a possible re-conceptualization of the PSAS.

1 Bookmark
  • ESRS; 01/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine psychological factors in insomnia and the association between psychological mechanisms and nighttime and daytime symptoms. Methods: A cross-sectional examination in the general population was used. The study sample consisted of 1890 participants from the general population. The participants completed a survey on nighttime and daytime symptoms, health outcomes, and psychological factors. Results: Relative to poor and normal sleepers, the insomnia group had higher scores on worry, beliefs, physiologic arousal, monitoring/attentional bias, and safety behaviors than the other two groups, and the poor sleepers exhibited a similar pattern relative to the normal sleepers. High total wake time was associated with more worry, physiologic arousal, and safety behaviors (26.3% variance), low sleep restoration with more worry, unhelpful beliefs, and monitoring/attentional bias (28.2% variance), and low sleep quality with higher scores on all the psychological mechanisms (35.8% variance). Elevated daytime symptoms were related to more unhelpful beliefs and monitoring/attentional bias (44.3% variance). Conclusion: The findings indicate that psychological factors are linked to nighttime and daytime symptomatology in insomnia.
    Cognitive behaviour therapy 03/2012;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insomnia is a common health problem that affects about 10% of the population. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the association between cognitive processes and the persistence and remission from insomnia in the general population. In a longitudinal design, 2333 participants completed a survey on night time and daytime symptoms, and cognitive processes. Follow-up surveys were sent out six months and 18 months after the first assessment. Participants were categorised as having persistent insomnia, being in remission from insomnia or being a normal sleeper. Cognitive processes distinguished between people with persistent insomnia and normal sleepers. Specifically, worry, dysfunctional beliefs, somatic arousal, selective attention and monitoring, and safety behaviours increased the likelihood of reporting persistent insomnia rather than normal sleep. For people with insomnia, more worry about sleep at baseline predicted persistent insomnia but not remission later on. Lower selective attention and monitoring, and use of safety behaviours over time increased the likelihood of remission from insomnia. In general, these results remained, when psychiatric symptoms and medical complaints were added to the models. The findings support that certain cognitive processes may be associated with persistence and remission of insomnia. Clinical implications are discussed.
    Behaviour research and therapy 01/2014; 54C:38-48. · 3.00 Impact Factor


Available from
May 29, 2014