Article

Economic burden of hypoglycemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (Impact Factor: 1.87). 02/2012; 12(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.87
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hypoglycemia is an acute complication of diabetes that increases morbidity, mortality and economic costs of diabetes. It presents major clinical problems for the management of Type 2 diabetes as this disease represents the great majority of all diabetes cases. Hypoglycemia makes it difficult for some individuals to achieve good glycemic control, reduces quality of life and increases the burden of diabetes to healthcare systems. Understanding hypoglycemia risk factors can help patients with Type 2 diabetes to correct and avoid hypoglycemia. Recently, an increased risk of hypoglycemia with intensive glycemic control has been identified as an important problem in optimally controlling blood glucose levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

1 Follower
 · 
235 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To compare characteristics of hypoglycemic episodes in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving saxagliptin or glipizide add-on therapy to metformin. Patients and Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of an international, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. The 52-week trial and 52-week extension were conducted from December 2007 to August 2010. Patients aged ≥18 years with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >6.5% to 10.0% receiving stable metformin doses (≥1500 mg/d) were randomized 1:1 to add-on therapy with saxagliptin 5 mg/d or glipizide 5 to 20 mg/d (titrated to optimal effect or highest tolerable dose during the initial 18 weeks). Hypoglycemic episodes were recorded in patient diaries. Confirmed hypoglycemic events were defined as fingerstick glucose ≤50 mg/dL (≤2.8 mmol/L) with associated symptoms. Results: Of 858 patients randomized, 428 received saxagliptin + metformin, and 430 received glipizide + metformin. Saxagliptin was noninferior to glipizide in lowering HbA1c. Hypoglycemia with saxagliptin + metformin and glipizide + metformin was reported by 15 (24 events) and 165 (896 events) patients, respectively, through week 104. The mean (SD) number of hypoglycemic events per patient reporting hypoglycemia was lower with saxagliptin + metformin versus glipizide + metformin through weeks 52 (1.5 [SD 0.88] vs 4.8 [SD 4.9], respectively) and 104 (1.6 [SD 0.99] vs 5.4 [SD 5.8]). Most patients receiving glipizide + metformin with hypoglycemia had multiple events (124/165 patients [75%]). Confirmed hypoglycemia, major events, and severe events occurred only with glipizide + metformin. Time to first hypoglycemic event was shorter with glipizide versus saxagliptin. Limitations of this analysis include its post hoc nature, a high rate of study discontinuation, and exclusion of patients with serious comorbidities and complications. Conclusion: Saxagliptin + metformin was associated with fewer patients reporting hypoglycemia and fewer and less severe hypoglycemic events in those experiencing hypoglycemia compared with glipizide + metformin. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00575588.
    Current Medical Research and Opinion 01/2014; DOI:10.1185/03007995.2014.880674 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vildagliptin plus metformin versus generic sulphonylurea plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, not controlled with metformin, from a Portuguese healthcare system perspective. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was constructed using risk equations from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model with a 10,000-patient cohort and a lifetime horizon. The model predicted microvascular and macrovascular complications and mortality in yearly cycles. Patients entered the model as metformin monotherapy failures and switched to alternative treatments (metformin plus basal-bolus insulin and subsequently metformin plus intensive insulin) when glycated haemoglobin A1c >7.5% was achieved. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical variables were derived from a Portuguese epidemiological study. Costs estimates were based on direct medical costs only. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the model. Results: There were fewer non-fatal diabetes-related adverse events (AEs) in patients treated with metformin plus vildagliptin compared with patients treated with metformin plus sulphonylurea (6752 versus 6815). Addition of vildagliptin compared with sulphonylurea led to increased drug acquisition costs but reduced costs of AEs, managing morbidities, and monitoring patients. Treatment with metformin plus vildagliptin yielded a mean per-patient gain of 0.1279 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and a mean per-patient increase in total cost of €1161, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €9072 per QALY. Univariate analyses showed that ICER values were robust and ranged from €4195 to €16,052 per QALY when different parameters were varied. Limitations: The model excluded several diabetes-related morbidities, such as peripheral neuropathy and ulceration, and did not model second events. Patients were presumed to enter the model with no diabetes-related complications. Conclusion: Treatment with metformin plus vildagliptin compared with metformin plus sulphonylurea is expected to result in a lower incidence of diabetes-related AEs and to be a cost-effective treatment strategy.
    Journal of Medical Economics 04/2014; DOI:10.3111/13696998.2014.912986
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To review and discuss the risks and impact of hypoglycemia and provide guidance for the prevention of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM).Methods: We review and discuss the risks and impact of hypoglycemia, providing specific guidance regarding the prevention of hypoglycemia and judicial selection of glucose-lowering agents in individuals with T2DM.Results: Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is under-recognized and under-reported. Emerging evidence from large clinical trials suggest that hypoglycemia may be an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality in T2DM. In addition, hypoglycemia is associated with poorer quality of life, greater healthcare utilization costs, and poor adherence to medical regiments.Conclusion: These findings have led professional organizations to emphasize the prevention of hypoglycemia as an important consideration when initiating or intensifying treatment regimens. In clinical settings, particular attention should be paid to a patient's risk for hypoglycemia when initiating or intensifying the pharmacological treatment regimen. Furthermore, the endocrinologist can play an important role in educating not only the patient, but also other members of the diabetes-management team regarding the need for individualized therapy.
    Endocrine Practice 02/2013; 19(3):1-33. DOI:10.4158/EP13005.RA · 2.59 Impact Factor