A Theory of Rate Coding Control by Intrinsic Plasticity Effects

Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique, CNRS - UMR 7222, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
PLoS Computational Biology (Impact Factor: 4.62). 01/2012; 8(1):e1002349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002349
Source: PubMed


Intrinsic plasticity (IP) is a ubiquitous activity-dependent process regulating neuronal excitability and a cellular correlate of behavioral learning and neuronal homeostasis. Because IP is induced rapidly and maintained long-term, it likely represents a major determinant of adaptive collective neuronal dynamics. However, assessing the exact impact of IP has remained elusive. Indeed, it is extremely difficult disentangling the complex non-linear interaction between IP effects, by which conductance changes alter neuronal activity, and IP rules, whereby activity modifies conductance via signaling pathways. Moreover, the two major IP effects on firing rate, threshold and gain modulation, remain unknown in their very mechanisms. Here, using extensive simulations and sensitivity analysis of Hodgkin-Huxley models, we show that threshold and gain modulation are accounted for by maximal conductance plasticity of conductance that situate in two separate domains of the parameter space corresponding to sub- and supra-threshold conductance (i.e. activating below or above the spike onset threshold potential). Analyzing equivalent integrate-and-fire models, we provide formal expressions of sensitivities relating to conductance parameters, unraveling unprecedented mechanisms governing IP effects. Our results generalize to the IP of other conductance parameters and allow strong inference for calcium-gated conductance, yielding a general picture that accounts for a large repertoire of experimental observations. The expressions we provide can be combined with IP rules in rate or spiking models, offering a general framework to systematically assess the computational

Download full-text


Available from: Hugues Berry, Jul 05, 2014
25 Reads
  • Source
    • "Simulations of motor performance in children with diagnosed ASD may be an important step towards a better understanding of pathological conditions that arise due to neural dysfunctions. Neural correlates of movement as well as the associated excitability of groups of neurons are influenced both by internal homeostasis and motor learning [12], but computational models of this phenomenon have not been described thus far. Despite decades of research, there are still several high-level competing control theories concerning animal movement aimed at explaining behavioral characteristics [11] [5]: • theories based on reflexes, explaining motor activity as a response to earlier sensory stimulation, • theory of motor programs that influence rules of movement, • hierarchical theories, based on processes that activate coordinated loops of neural activity at various levels of nervous system, • theories based on intrinsic dynamical processes, perceiving movement as result of interactions between elements of movement control system, without external commands, • ecological theories, stressing the importance of environment that resulted in affordance perception stimulating the need for specific movements, • system theories, perceiving movement as a result of behavioral plans, influenced by human goals and tasks, constrained by the environment. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A diversity of symptoms in autism dictates a broad definition of Autism Spectrum of Disorders (ASD). Each year, the percentage of children diagnosed with ASD is growing. One common diagnostic feature in individuals with ASD is the tendency to exhibit atypical simple cyclic movements. The motor brain activity seems to generate a periodic attractor state that is hard to escape. Despite numerous studies, scientists and clinicians do not know exactly if ASD is a result of a simple yet general mechanism or of a complex set of mechanisms (either on the neural, molecular and system levels). Simulations using the biologically relevant neural network model presented here may help to reveal the simplest mechanisms that may be responsible for specific behavior. Abnormal neural fatigue mechanisms may be responsible for motor symptoms as well as many (or perhaps all) of the other symptoms observed in ASD.
    01/2013; 14(3):475-489. DOI:10.7494/csci.2013.14.3.475
  • Source
    eLS, 09/2009; , ISBN: 9780470015902
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Homeostatic intrinsic plasticity (HIP) is a ubiquitous cellular mechanism regulating neuronal activity, cardinal for the proper functioning of nervous systems. In invertebrates, HIP is critical for orchestrating stereotyped activity patterns. The functional impact of HIP remains more obscure in vertebrate networks, where higher order cognitive processes rely on complex neural dynamics. The hypothesis has emerged that HIP might control the complexity of activity dynamics in recurrent networks, with important computational consequences. However, conflicting results about the causal relationships between cellular HIP, network dynamics, and computational performance have arisen from machine-learning studies. Here, we assess how cellular HIP effects translate into collective dynamics and computational properties in biological recurrent networks. We develop a realistic multiscale model including a generic HIP rule regulating the neuronal threshold with actual molecular signaling pathways kinetics, Dale's principle, sparse connectivity, synaptic balance, and Hebbian synaptic plasticity (SP). Dynamic mean-field analysis and simulations unravel that HIP sets a working point at which inputs are transduced by large derivative ranges of the transfer function. This cellular mechanism ensures increased network dynamics complexity, robust balance with SP at the edge of chaos, and improved input separability. Although critically dependent upon balanced excitatory and inhibitory drives, these effects display striking robustness to changes in network architecture, learning rates, and input features. Thus, the mechanism we unveil might represent a ubiquitous cellular basis for complex dynamics in neural networks. Understanding this robustness is an important challenge to unraveling principles underlying self-organization around criticality in biological recurrent neural networks.
    The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 09/2013; 33(38):15032-43. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0870-13.2013 · 6.34 Impact Factor
Show more