Article

Improved equity in measles vaccination from integrating insecticide-treated bednets in a vaccination campaign, Madagascar.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA  HealthBridge/University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada  Expanded Programme on Immunization, Ministry of Health, Madagascar.
Tropical Medicine & International Health (Impact Factor: 2.3). 01/2012; 17(4):430-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02953.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective  To evaluate the effect of integrating ITN distribution on measles vaccination campaign coverage in Madagascar. Methods  Nationwide cross-sectional survey to estimate measles vaccination coverage, nationally, and in districts with and without ITN integration. To evaluate the effect of ITN integration, propensity score matching was used to create comparable samples in ITN and non-ITN districts. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated via log-binomial models. Equity ratios, defined as the coverage ratio between the lowest and highest household wealth quintile (Q), were used to assess equity in measles vaccination coverage. Results  National measles vaccination coverage during the campaign was 66.9% (95% CI 63.0-70.7). Among the propensity score subset, vaccination campaign coverage was higher in ITN districts (70.8%) than non-ITN districts (59.1%) (RR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). Among children in the poorest wealth quintile, vaccination coverage was higher in ITN than in non-ITN districts (Q1; RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.8) and equity for measles vaccination was greater in ITN districts (equity ratio = 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.3) than in non-ITN districts (equity ratio = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). Conclusion  Integration of ITN distribution with a vaccination campaign might improve measles vaccination coverage among the poor, thus providing protection for the most vulnerable and difficult to reach children.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
86 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Supplementary immunization activity (SIA) campaigns provide children with an additional dose of measles vaccine and deliver other interventions, including vitamin A supplements, deworming medications, and oral polio vaccines. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the full SIA delivery platform in South Africa (SA). Design: We used an epidemiologic cost model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the 2010 SIA campaign. We used province-level campaign data sourced from the District Health Information System, SA, and from planning records of provincial coordinators of the Expanded Programme on Immunization. The data included the number of children immunized with measles and polio vaccines, the number of children given vitamin A supplements and Albendazole tablets, and costs. Results: The campaign cost $37 million and averted a total of 1,150 deaths (95% uncertainty range: 990-1,360). This ranged from 380 deaths averted in KwaZulu-Natal to 20 deaths averted in the Northern Cape. Vitamin A supplementation alone averted 820 deaths (95% UR: 670-1,040); measles vaccination alone averted 330 deaths (95% UR: 280-370). Incremental cost-effectiveness was $27,100 (95% UR: $18,500-34,400) per death averted nationally, ranging from $11,300 per death averted in the Free State to $91,300 per death averted in the Eastern Cape. Conclusions: Cost-effectiveness of the SIA child health delivery platform varies substantially across SA provinces, and it is substantially more cost-effective when vitamin A supplementation is included in the interventions administered. Cost-effectiveness assessments should consider health system delivery platforms that integrate multiple interventions, and they should be conducted at the sub-national level.
    Global Health Action 03/2013; 6:1-9. DOI:10.3402/gha.v6i0.20056 · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Supplemental immunisation activity (SIA) campaigns provide children with an additional dose of measles vaccine and deliver other child health interventions including vitamin A supplements, deworming medications and oral polio vaccines. They also require the mobilisation of a large health workforce. We assess the impact of the implementation of SIA campaigns on selected routine child and maternal health services in South Africa (SA). We use district-level monthly headcount data for 52 South African districts for the period 2001-2010, sourced from the District Health Information System, SA. The data include 12 child and maternal health headcount indicators including routine immunisation, and maternal and reproductive health indicators. We analyse the association between the implementation of the 2010 SIA campaign and the change (decrease/increase) in headcounts, using a linear regression model. We find a significant decrease for eight indicators. The total number of fully immunised children before age 1 decreased by 29% (95% CI 23% to 35%, p<0.001) during the month of SIA implementation; contraceptive use and antenatal visits decreased by 7-17% (p ≤ 0.02) and about 10% (p<0.001), respectively. SIA campaigns may negatively impact health systems during the period of implementation by disrupting regular functioning and diverting resources from other activities, including routine child and maternal health services. SIA campaigns present multidimensional costs that need to be explicitly considered in benefit-cost assessments.
    Journal of epidemiology and community health 08/2013; 67(11). DOI:10.1136/jech-2012-202216 · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measles supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) offer children in countries with weaker immunization delivery systems like India a second opportunity for measles vaccination. They could also provide a platform to deliver additional interventions, but the feasibility and acceptability of including add-ons is uncertain. We surveyed Indian programme officers involved in the current (2010-2012) measles SIAs concerning opportunities and challenges of using SIAs as a delivery platform for other maternal and child health interventions. Respondents felt that an expanded SIA strategy including add-ons could be of great value in improving access and efficiency. They viewed management challenges, logistics, and safety as the most important potential barriers. They proposed that additional interventions be selected using several criteria, of which importance of the health problem, safety, and contribution to health equity figured most prominently. For children, they recommended inclusion of basic interventions to address nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoea and parasites over vaccines. For mothers, micronutrient interventions were highest ranked.
    Vaccine 10/2012; 31(9). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.044 · 3.49 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
28 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014