A Performance Improvement Process to Tackle Tachysystole

Summa Health System, Akron City Hospital, 525 East Market Med II, Akron, OH 44309, USA.
Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.02). 09/2011; 40(5):512-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01275.x
Source: PubMed


Inappropriate use of oxytocin is an important patient safety issue. In this article, the authors describe success in "tackling tachysystole" using an evidence-based algorithm for oxytocin administration. Monthly audits (N = 1160) reached 100% compliance. An algorithm posted at the bedside, multidisciplinary follow-up, education, and widely disseminated results helped counter resistance and normalization of deviance. Clinicians need standardized definitions and guidelines with measures of progress to manage safety concerns such as tachysystole.

1 Follower
20 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inappropriate elective inductions of labor put patients at increased risk of cesarean, neonatal morbidity, and elevated cost. A scheduling procedure and consent form were implemented to eliminate elective induction at less than 39 weeks gestation and align indications for induction with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. In 25 of the 28 months following implementation of the new process, we achieved the goal of eliminating elective induction of labor at less than 39 weeks gestation.
    Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 06/2012; 41(4):462-73. DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01380.x · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe a nurse peer-review process to improve late deceleration recognition and intervention on one labor and delivery unit. Monthly chart audits (n = 721) met the goal of 75% reviewer agreement after the 4th month of implementation and have been maintained to date. Nurses recognized for excellence were more likely to be certified, work day shift, or be a member of the Perinatal Safety Team. Institutional support, a dedicated review team, and education contributed to success.
    Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 03/2013; 42(2):215-224. DOI:10.1111/1552-6909.12023 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess outcomes and costs of dyads achieving elective induction bundle criteria with a favorable Bishop score. In a historical automated records-based cohort study, 180 dyads undergoing elective induction bundling at a single institution from 2009 to 2010 were compared to a pre-introduction of bundling cohort. The bundled cohort was then compared by Bishop score. The bundled cohort (n = 180) had a lower cesarean delivery rate (12% vs. 21%, p = 0.01), but neonatal special or intensive care admissions were not statistically significant compared to the pre-introduction of bundling cohort (n = 473). Ninety-six percent (n = 173) of the bundled cohort achieved bundle criteria. Those with a Bishop score > 6 (52%, n = 90) had fewer cesarean deliveries (4% vs. 19%, p = 0.003), fewer neonatal special or intensive care admissions (1% vs. 10%, p = 0.015), shorter induction time to vaginal delivery (8.8 vs. 17 hrs, p < 0.001), fewer cesareans for dystocia (75% vs. 94%, p = 0.002) or fetal heart rate abnormalities (25% vs. 50%, p = 0.015), and had one-sixth the average net income lost ($423 vs. $2,600, p < 0.001) compared to bundle achievers with a Bishop score of < or = 6. The elective induction bundle does not guarantee quality and should require favorable cervix instead of documented Bishop score to proceed with induction.
    The Journal of reproductive medicine 09/2013; 58(9-10):402-10. · 0.70 Impact Factor
Show more