Are Tuberculosis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Hyderabad, India Being Managed According to National Guidelines?

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, India.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 01/2012; 7(1):e30281. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030281
Source: PubMed


A tertiary health care facility (Government General and Chest hospital) in Hyderabad, India.
To assess a) the extent of compliance of specialists to standardized national (RNTCP) tuberculosis management guidelines and b) if patients on discharge from hospital were being appropriately linked up with peripheral health facilities for continuation of anti-Tuberculosis (TB) treatment.
A descriptive study using routine programme data and involving all TB patients admitted to inpatient care from 1(st) January to 30(th) June, 2010.
There were a total of 3120 patients admitted of whom, 1218 (39%) required anti-TB treatment. Of these 1104 (98%) were treated with one of the RNTCP recommended regimens, while 28 (2%) were treated with non-RNTCP regimens. The latter included individually tailored MDR-TB treatment regimens for 19 patients and adhoc regimens for nine patients. A total of 957 (86%) patients were eventually discharged from the hospital of whom 921 (96%) had a referral form filled for continuing treatment at a peripheral health facility. Formal feedback from peripheral health facilities on continuation of TB treatment was received for 682 (74%) patients. In a tertiary health facility with specialists the great majority of TB patients are managed in line with national guidelines. However a number of short-comings were revealed and measures to rectify these are discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: Sharath Burugina Nagaraja,
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem in India. The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), started in 1997, involved medical colleges in the control of TB on a high priority. We assessed whether patients with TB referred from a tertiary care hospital in Delhi reached the desired peripheral health institution and had their treatment initiated. Methods: This descriptive, retrospective study was done at a tertiary care hospital and included all patients with a diagnosis of TB (pulmonary or extrapulmonary) who were seen at the referral centre during the year 2011. Data were collected from various records of the referral centre and analysed for availability of feedback of the referred patients. Information regarding their registration and initiation of treatment was also collected. Postcards were used for the first time to trace referrals in patients with TB. Results: The majority (94%) of patients with TB seen in the referral centre at a tertiary care facility were referred to a peripheral health institution nearest to their place of residence. Feedback on referral was received from these institutions for 79.4% of patients from the National Capital Region (NCR) of Delhi and for 47.4% of patients from outside the NCR of Delhi. Conclusion: We found that a majority of patients with TB were referred and the registration and initiation of treatment could be traced in >75% of patients.
    The National medical journal of India 12/2013; 26(6):332-334. · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2009, the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) jointly developed a new paradigm for operational research (OR) capacity building and started a new process of appointing and supporting OR fellows in the field. This case study describes 1) the appointment of two OR fellows in The Union South-East Asia Office (USEA), New Delhi, India; 2) how this led to the development of an OR unit in that organisation; 3) achievements over the 5-year period from June 2009 to June 2014; and 4) challenges and lessons learnt. In June 2009, the first OR fellow in India was appointed on a full-time basis and the second was appointed in February 2012—both had limited previous experience in OR. From 2009 to 2014, annual research output and capacity building initiatives rose exponentially, and included 1) facilitation at 61 OR training courses/modules; 2) publication of 96 papers, several of which had a lasting impact on national policy and practice; 3) providing technical assistance in promoting OR; 4) building the capacity of medical college professionals in data management; 5) support to programme staff for disseminating their research findings; 6) reviewing 28 scientific papers for national or international peer-reviewed journals; and 7) developing 45 scientific abstracts for presentation at national and international conferences. The reasons for this success are highlighted along with ongoing challenges. This experience from India provides good evidence for promoting similar models elsewhere.
    03/2015; 5(1):6-16. DOI:10.5588/pha.14.0111
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While Indian studies have assessed care providers' knowledge and practices, there is no systematic review on the quality of tuberculosis (TB) care. We searched multiple sources to identify studies (2000-2014) on providers' knowledge and practices. We used the International Standards for TB Care to benchmark quality of care. Of the 47 studies included, 35 were questionnaire surveys and 12 used chart abstraction. None assessed actual practice using standardised patients. Heterogeneity in the findings precluded meta-analysis. Of 22 studies evaluating provider knowledge about using sputum smears for diagnosis, 10 found that less than half of providers had correct knowledge; 3 of 4 studies assessing self-reported practices by providers found that less than a quarter reported ordering smears for patients with chest symptoms. In 11 of 14 studies that assessed treatment, less than one third of providers knew the standard regimen for drug-susceptible TB. Adherence to standards in practice was generally lower than correct knowledge of those standards. Eleven studies with both public and private providers found higher levels of appropriate knowledge/practice in the public sector. Available evidence suggests suboptimal quality of TB care, particularly in the private sector. Improvement of quality of care should be a priority for India.
    The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 04/2015; DOI:10.5588/ijtld.15.0186 · 2.32 Impact Factor