Urological leaks after pelvic exenterations comparing formation of colonic and ileal conduits.

ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.56). 04/2012; 38(4):361-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess possible risk factors for urinary leakage of a newly formed urinary conduit after a partial or total pelvic exenteration.
An analysis was conducted from prospectively collected data of patients who underwent a pelvic exenteration with conduit formation for advanced and recurrent pelvic cancer.
Of 232 patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration, 74 (32%) had a conduit formed. Of these, 47 (64%) had an ileal conduit compared with 27 (36%) a colonic conduit. Twelve (16%) patients developed a leak, of which nine occurred within the first month. Factors associated with a conduit leak included involvement of R2 surgical margins (43%), the magnitude of the exenteration and a current cardiovascular medical history (27%). Leaks were not found to be associated with either radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The 30-day leak rate for ileal conduits was 17% (8/47) and 4% (1/27) for colonic conduits with enterocutaneous fistula only occurring in the ileal conduit group (2/47). Fistula, drained collections and sepsis occurred in 40% of ileal and 19% of colonic conduits (p < 0.01). Patients with a conduit leak had a longer length of stay (59 versus 23 days, p < 0.001).
Urine leaks after conduit formation in association with exenterations are relatively common with a prolonged length of hospital stay. Positive surgical margins and exenterations involving all four quadrants of the pelvis were associated with higher leak rates. There was no evidence of a difference between ileal and colonic conduits and number of leaks. However colonic conduits had less total complications including sepsis, leak and pelvic collections with comparatively no complications of a small bowel fistula.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urine leak following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced pelvic malignancy is a major complication leading to increased mortality, morbidity and length of stay. We reviewed our experience and developed a diagnostic and management algorithm for urine leaks in this patient population. Consecutive patients who underwent en bloc cystectomy and conduit formation as part of pelvic exenteration at a single quaternary referral centre from 1995 to 2012 were reviewed. Patients with urine leak were identified. Medical records were reviewed to extract data on diagnosis and management and a suggested clinical algorithm was developed. Of 325 exenterations, there were 102 conduits, of which 15 patients (15%) developed a conduit related urine leak. Most (14/15) patients were symptomatic. Diagnosis was made by drain creatinine studies (12/15) and/or imaging (15/15). Management comprised of conservative management, radiologic urinary diversion, early surgical revision and late surgical revision in 3, 11, 2 and 1 patients respectively. Important lessons from our 17 year experience include a high index of suspicion in a patient who is persistently septic despite appropriate treatment, the importance of regular drain creatinine studies, CT (computer tomography) with delayed images (CT intravenous pyelogram) when performing a CT for investigation of sepsis and early aggressive management with radiologic urinary diversion to facilitate early healing. Urine leak after pelvic exenteration is a complex problem. Conservative management usually fails and early diagnosis and intervention is the key. It is hoped that our algorithms will facilitate diagnosis and subsequent management of this group of patients.
    European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 10/2013; · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review recently published literature presenting an overview of the current insights and (clinical and technical) developments on pelvic exenterative surgery for gynecological malignancies.
    Current opinion in oncology. 07/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Estimate the overall rates of significant incontinent conduit-related complications and compare rates between conduit types. Methods This was a retrospective review of 166 patients who underwent incontinent urinary diversion from April 1993 through April 2013. Patients were categorized by conduit type – ileal, sigmoid colon, and transverse colon. Significant conduit-related complications were assessed at 30 and 90 days after surgery. Significant conduit-related complication was defined as any of the following: ureteral stricture, conduit leak, conduit obstruction, conduit ischemia, ureteral anastomotic leak, stent obstruction requiring intervention via interventional radiology procedure or reoperation, and renal failure. Results A total of 166 patients underwent formation of an incontinent urinary conduit, most commonly during exenteration for gynecologic malignancy. There were 129 ileal, 11 transverse colon, and 26 sigmoid conduits. The overall significant conduit-related complication rate within 30 days was 15.1%. Complications rates for ileal, transverse and sigmoid conduits were 14.7%, 0%, and 23.1%, respectively (Fisher’s exact test,p = 0.24). By 90 days, the Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of significant complications were 21.8% overall, and 22.3%, 0%, and 28.9%, respectively, by conduit type (log-rank test,p = 0.19). The most common significant conduit-related complications were conduit or ureteral anastomotic leaks and conduit obstructions. By 1 and 2 years following surgery, the Kaplan-Meier estimated overall rate of significant conduit-related complication increased to 26.5% and 30.1%, respectively. Conclusions Our study suggests that there are multiple appropriate tissue sites for use in incontinent conduit formation, and surgical approach should be individualized. Most significant conduit-related complications occur within 90 days after surgery.
    Gynecologic Oncology 06/2014; · 3.93 Impact Factor