Article

Image Analysis of HER2 Immunohistochemical Staining Reproducibility and Concordance With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization of a Laboratory-Validated Scoring Technique

Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (Impact Factor: 3.01). 02/2012; 137(2):270-6. DOI: 10.1309/AJCP9MKNLHQNK2ZX
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Image analysis of the HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) stain can help determine which breast cancer patients may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. We studied the concordance of HER2 IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as well as reproducibility of surgical pathologist (SP) and cytotechnologist (CT) interpretations using manual and image analysis methodologies on 154 IHC cases. Concordances with FISH were good for IHC negative (0, 1+) cases (range, 97%-100%) and positive (3+) cases (range, 87%-100%). Image analysis had fewer equivocal (2+) results (10.4%) than CT (14.9%) and SP (16.2%) manual methods, with higher concordances to FISH (31%, 26%, and 20% for image analysis, CT manual, and SP manual, respectively). CT manual (κ = 0.747) and image analysis (κ = 0.779) methods had better interobserver reproducibility than SP manual (κ = 0.697). CT image analysis had better intraobserver reproducibility (κ = 0.882) than CT (κ = 0.828) and SP (κ = 0.766) manual methods. HER2 IHC analysis performed by image analysis can produce accurate results with improved reproducibility.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Aziza Nassar, Aug 21, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
100 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of cytotechnologists has focused primarily on the microscopic examination of cytologic specimens for diagnosing disease. Cytotechnologists currently evaluate a wide assortment of both gynecological and nongynecological cytology specimens. However, the Pap test remains the primary test for most cytology laboratories. Recently, human papillomavirus testing and newer cervical cancer screening guidelines have reduced the number of Pap tests, resulting in some anxiety and concern among the cytology community. However, as Pap test volumes continue to decrease, molecular oncology and ancillary testing volumes continue to increase with the advent of new biomarkers and associated personalized therapies. This change in clinical practice has resulted in evolving roles for many cytotechnologists. Cytotechnologists have skills based not only in morphology but also in understanding concepts of disease including neoplasia. These skills allow cytotechnologists to excel in many other types of laboratory testing. This article discusses how the roles of the cytotechnologist have recently expanded at our institution to include involvement in DNA ploidy analysis, quantitative immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, circulating tumor cells, and molecular oncology testing. Lastly, this article discusses how these newer roles benefit both the cytotechnologist and the clinical laboratory.
    Acta cytologica 01/2012; 56(6):678-85. DOI:10.1159/000341169 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Prognostic and predictive tumor markers in breast cancer are most commonly performed on core needle biopsies (CNB) of the primary tumor. Because treatment recommendations are influenced by these markers, it is imperative to verify strong concordance between tumor markers on CNB specimens and the corresponding surgical specimens (SS). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was performed on 165 women (205 samples) with breast cancer diagnosed from January 2009 to July 2011. Tumor type, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 expression by immunohistochemical (IHC) testing were retrospectively analyzed in the CNB and SS. Contingency tables and agreement modeling were performed. RESULTS: There was substantial agreement between the CNB and SS for PR% and HER2; moderate agreement for tumor type, grade, and ER%; and fair agreement for Ki67%. In 8% of patients (n = 13), tumor heterogeneity was seen. In heterogeneous tumors the overall concordance between the CNB and SS was worse, especially for HER2. Six of these patients had areas of tumor that were positive for HER2, which were not detected in their CNBs. Nine patients had multiple distinct molecular subtypes within their tumor(s). CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneous distribution of antigens in breast cancer tumors raises concern that the CNB may not adequately represent the true biologic profile in all patients. There is strong concordance for tumor type, ER, and PR between CNB and SS (although a quantitative decline was noted from CNB to SS); however, HER2 activity does not appear to be adequately detected on CNB in patients with heterogeneous tumors. These data suggest that IHC testing on the CNB alone may not be adequate to tailor targeted therapy in all patients.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 11/2012; 216(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.007 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an important proto-oncogene of prognostic use in gastric cancer (GC). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the main clinical methods of detection of HER2, but consistency between the methods is poor and the cause of the discrepancy is unclear. To investigate the involvement of HER2 mRNA status in the disparity between gene amplification and protein overexpression. We investigated HER2 gene, mRNA, and protein profiles in gastric precancer and cancer tissues by use of the molecular approaches FISH, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and IHC. The relationships between HER2 and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and Smad7 expression were analyzed and the involvement of HER2 in the interaction between tumor cells and lymphocytes was investigated by coculturing GC cell lines with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). HER2 protein expression was significantly increased in cancer compared with precancer (P = 0.003), and the corresponding mRNA levels were significantly lower in precancer and cancer tissues than in normal tissues (κ = 0.290, P = 0.025). HER2 mRNA levels were significantly higher in tumor than in peritumor tissue (P = 0.028), and were positively correlated with MMP9 and Smad7 mRNA levels in tumor tissues. HER2 mRNA expression in GC cell lines was increased by coculture with PBMCs. Different HER2 mRNA profiles, possibly in relation to contact between tumor cells and lymphocytes, might help to explain the discrepancy between gene amplification and protein overexpression results.
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2013; 59(2). DOI:10.1007/s10620-013-2925-1 · 2.55 Impact Factor