Article

Effectiveness and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet versus pemetrexed alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Department of Oncology, The Sixth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (impact factor: 2.56). 01/2012; 138(5):745-51. DOI:10.1007/s00432-012-1155-9 pp.745-51
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed in patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate and grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Data were extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
Five randomized clinical trials (totally 1,186 patients) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95, P = 0.007) and overall response rate (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.58-3.62, P = 0.000) in pemetrexed-based doublet group, compared with pemetrexed alone, though the pooled HR for overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76-1.04; P = 0.129) showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, there were more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.77, P = 0.001), thrombocytopenia (OR 6.41, 95% CI 2.57-16.0, P = 0.000), and leucopenia (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.13-5.34, P = 0.024) in pemetrexed-based doublet group. With regard to the risk of grade 3 or 4 anemia (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.17-2.91, P = 0.629) and fatigue (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92-2.35, P = 0.104), there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Pemetrexed-based doublet therapy didn't gain any benefit in survival but significantly improved PFS and better ORR compared with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia were observed in pemetrexed-based doublet group.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
37 Views

Keywords

2 independent reviewers
 
4 neutropenia
 
College Station
 
compared pemetrexed-based doublet
 
grade 3
 
non-small-cell lung cancer
 
pemetrexed-based doublet
 
pemetrexed-based doublet group
 
Pemetrexed-based doublet therapy
 
pooled HR
 
primary end point
 
randomized clinical trials
 
response rate
 
second-line therapy
 
second-line treatment
 
Secondary end points
 
single-agent pemetrexed
 
Stata Corporation
 
Stata version 10.0 software
 
two groups
 

Wei-Xiang Qi