Article
Effectiveness and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet versus pemetrexed alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Department of Oncology, The Sixth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (impact factor:
2.56).
01/2012;
138(5):745-51.
DOI:10.1007/s00432-012-1155-9
pp.745-51
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
-
Cited In (0)
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
2 independent reviewers
4 neutropenia
College Station
compared pemetrexed-based doublet
grade 3
non-small-cell lung cancer
pemetrexed-based doublet
pemetrexed-based doublet group
Pemetrexed-based doublet therapy
pooled HR
primary end point
randomized clinical trials
response rate
second-line therapy
second-line treatment
Secondary end points
single-agent pemetrexed
Stata Corporation
Stata version 10.0 software
two groups