Article
Comparison of basal oscillatory rhythm of retinal activities in rd1 and rd10 mice.
department of Physiology, Chungbuk National University School of Medicine, Cheongju 361-763, Republic ofKorea.
Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference
08/2011;
2011:1093-6.
DOI:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090255
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Spontaneous Oscillatory Rhythm in Retinal Activities of Two Retinal Degeneration (rd1 and rd10) Mice.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Previously, we reported that besides retinal ganglion cell (RGC) spike, there is ~ 10 Hz oscillatory rhythmic activity in local field potential (LFP) in retinal degeneration model, rd1 mice. The more recently identified rd10 mice have a later onset and slower rate of photoreceptor degeneration than the rd1 mice, providing more therapeutic potential. In this study, before adapting rd10 mice as a new animal model for our electrical stimulation study, we investigated electrical characteristics of rd10 mice. From the raw waveform of recording using 8×8 microelectrode array (MEA) from in vitro-whole mount retina, RGC spikes and LFP were isolated by using different filter setting. Fourier transform was performed for detection of frequency of bursting RGC spikes and oscillatory field potential (OFP). In rd1 mice, ~10 Hz rhythmic burst of spontaneous RGC spikes is always phase-locked with the OFP and this phase-locking property is preserved regardless of postnatal ages. However, in rd10 mice, there is a strong phase-locking tendency between the spectral peak of bursting RGC spikes (~5 Hz) and the first peak of OFP (~5 Hz) across different age groups. But this phase-locking property is not robust as in rd1 retina, but maintains for a few seconds. Since rd1 and rd10 retina show phase-locking property at different frequency (~10 Hz vs. ~5 Hz), we expect different response patterns to electrical stimulus between rd1 and rd10 retina. Therefore, to extract optimal stimulation parameters in rd10 retina, first we might define selection criteria for responding rd10 ganglion cells to electrical stimulus.Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 12/2011; 15(6):415-22. · 0.96 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
200 Hz high-pass filter
8 weeks
different postnatal ages
diseased retinas
Extracellular action potentials
field potentials
lesser studies
onset degeneration
oscillatory rhythmic activity
raw waveform
rd1 mouse
rd1 retinas
rd10 mice
rd10 retina
Recent studies
retinal ganglion cell
retinal recording
RGC spikes [4 weeks
slow wave component
statistical difference