Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 307: 491-497

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Rd, Room 4315, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 35.29). 02/2012; 307(5):491-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.39
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Between 1980 and 1999, the prevalence of adult obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) increased in the United States and the distribution of BMI changed. More recent data suggested a slowing or leveling off of these trends.
To estimate the prevalence of adult obesity from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and compare adult obesity and the distribution of BMI with data from 1999-2008.
NHANES includes measured heights and weights for 5926 adult men and women from a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized US population in 2009-2010 and for 22,847 men and women in 1999-2008.
The prevalence of obesity and mean BMI.
In 2009-2010 the age-adjusted mean BMI was 28.7 (95% CI, 28.3-29.1) for men and also 28.7 (95% CI, 28.4-29.0) for women. Median BMI was 27.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 24.7-31.7) for men and 27.3 (IQR, 23.3-32.7) for women. The age-adjusted prevalence of obesity was 35.5% (95% CI, 31.9%-39.2%) among adult men and 35.8% (95% CI, 34.0%-37.7%) among adult women. Over the 12-year period from 1999 through 2010, obesity showed no significant increase among women overall (age- and race-adjusted annual change in odds ratio [AOR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .07), but increases were statistically significant for non-Hispanic black women (P = .04) and Mexican American women (P = .046). For men, there was a significant linear trend (AOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; P < .001) over the 12-year period. For both men and women, the most recent 2 years (2009-2010) did not differ significantly (P = .08 for men and P = .24 for women) from the previous 6 years (2003-2008). Trends in BMI were similar to obesity trends.
In 2009-2010, the prevalence of obesity was 35.5% among adult men and 35.8% among adult women, with no significant change compared with 2003-2008.

Download full-text


Available from: Margaret Carroll, Sep 28, 2015
152 Reads
    • ") [1] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evidence on the association between anthropometric measures quantifying body fatness and prostate cancer (PCa) risk is not entirely consistent. Associations among waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio, body mass index (BMI), and PCa risk were assessed in a population-based case-control study. The study included 1933 incident PCa cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2009. Population controls were 1994 age-matched (±5y) Montreal residents selected from electoral lists. Information on sociodemographics, medical history including PCa screening, height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences was collected through interviews. Logistic regression was used to assess odds ratios (ORs) for the association between anthropometric measures, and overall and grade-specific PCa. After adjustment for BMI, an excess risk of high-grade PCa (Gleason≥7) was associated with a WC ≥102cm (OR = 1.47 [1.22-1.78]) and with a waist-hip ratio >1.0 (OR = 1.20 [1.01-1.43]). Men with a BMI≥30kg/m(2) had a lower risk of PCa, regardless of grade. Restricting to subjects recently screened for PCa did not alter findings. Elevated BMI was associated with a lower risk of PCa, regardless of grade. Contrastingly, abdominal obesity, when adjusted for BMI, yielded results in the opposite direction. Taken together, our observations suggest that the specific body fat distribution (abdominal), for a given BMI, is a predictor of PCa risk, whereas BMI alone is not. BMI and abdominal obesity, especially when measured by the WC, should be examined conjointly in future studies on this issue and may require consideration at patient counseling. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Urologic Oncology 08/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.07.006 · 2.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Children's nutrition and nutritional status can affect adult health (Gelperowic and Beharrell, 1994; Dietz, 1998; Biro and Wien, 2010) and has therefore important long-term implications for individual development as well as national healthcare systems. However, in many industrialized countries, there is a major gap between dietary recommendations and actual food choices in the population, with obesity already highly prevalent in children (e.g., James et al., 2001; Janssen et al., 2005; Rosario et al., 2010; Flegal et al., 2012). This imbalance between dietary recommendations and actual food-intake can at least partially be explained by an obesogenic environment that promotes high amounts of energy-dense food products to children (Lobstein and Dibb, 2005; Halford et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food marketing research shows that child-directed marketing cues have pronounced effects on food preferences and consumption, but are most often placed on products with low nutritional quality. Effects of child-directed marketing strategies for healthy food products remain to be studied in more detail. Previous research suggests that effort provision explains additional variance in food choice. This study investigated the effects of packaging cues on explicit preferences and effort provision for healthy food items in elementary school children. Each of 179 children rated three, objectively identical, recommended yogurt-cereal-fruit snacks presented with different packaging cues. Packaging cues included a plain label, a label focusing on health aspects of the product, and a label that additionally included unknown cartoon characters. The children were asked to state the subjective taste-pleasantness of the respective food items. We also used a novel approach to measure effort provision for food items in children, namely handgrip strength. Results show that packaging cues significantly induce a taste-placebo effect in 88% of the children, i.e., differences in taste ratings for objectively identical products. Taste ratings were highest for the child-directed product that included cartoon characters. Also, applied effort to receive the child-directed product was significantly higher. Our results confirm the positive effect of child-directed marketing strategies also for healthy snack food products. Using handgrip strength as a measure to determine the amount of effort children are willing to provide for a product may explain additional variance in food choice and might prove to be a promising additional research tool for field studies and the assessment of public policy interventions.
    Frontiers in Psychology 07/2015; 6:882. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00882 · 2.80 Impact Factor
    • "Many individuals with this disorder remain undiagnosed in the general population [3]. With the global obesity epidemic, the prevalence of SDB is likely to increase severalfold [4] [5]. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the most common form of SDB, is known to be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease, and stroke [6] [7], and it increases cardiovascular and all-cause mortality [6] [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective/background: Via this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the association between sleep disordered breathing (SDB)/obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cancer incidence. Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane central, and electronic databases were searched for relevant studies in any language. Studies were included if they: 1) studied patients with SDB/OSA, 2) reported cancer incidence rates specific to patients with SDB/OSA and 3) SDB/OSA was defined using sleep study based objective measures. Quality of included studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOQA). Results: Of the 8766 retrieved citations, 5 studies that defined SDB/OSA using apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) or respiratory disturbance index (RDI) totaling 34,848 patients with SDB and 77380 patients without SDB were pooled into a meta-analysis. All 5 studies were of good quality (NOQA ≥ 6). Five hundred seventy four (1.6%) and 290 (0.37%) incident cancers were reported in patients with and without SDB, respectively. In the unadjusted analysis, patients with SDB/OSA were at increased risk for incident cancer (RR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.31 – 1.79, P < 0.001, I2: 0, 5 included studies). When adjusted for traditional cancer risk factors, the association between SDB/OSA and cancer incidence, though it attenuates (RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.01 – 1.95, P = 0.04, I2: 60%, 5 included studies), remains significant. Conclusions: SDB/OSA may increase risk of incident cancer. Inferring an independent association is not possible from our analysis considering the retrospective cohort design of the included studies and high inter-study heterogeneity. An individual patient data meta-analysis would help to validate our findings.
    Sleep Medicine 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2015.04.014 · 3.15 Impact Factor
Show more